Condition Assessment of the Eastbound 6th Avenue Viaduct Using Strain Gauges
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 18, Issue 4
Abstract
This paper presents the procedure and results of a strain gauge study completed on the eastbound 6th Avenue Viaduct in Denver. The 6th Avenue Viaduct was modified in a 1997–1998 rehabilitation, making the entire superstructure continuous. New sliding bearing pads failed to properly accommodate expansion and contraction of the bridge superstructure due to temperature changes. Visible damage due to contraction of the superstructure in the winter of 1999–2000 prompted a study of substructure elements to determine the short-term safety and long-term viability of the bridge. Substructure elements were instrumented with a total of 62 strain gauges and two concrete crack gauges. Data were taken for a period of 3 months. Analysis of the data suggests that the bridge is safe for short-term use, but that the long-term viability of the structure has been compromised. Repair or replacement of substructure elements is recommended, along with frequent monitoring during the interim period.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Allen, B. ( 2002). Non-destructive evaluation of the 6th Avenue Viaduct using strain gauges, Univ. of Colorado at Denver, Denver.
2.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). ( 1996). Standard specifications for highway bridges, Washington, D.C.
3.
American Concrete Institute (ACI). ( 1996). Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-95) and commentary (ACI 318R-95), Farmington Hills, Mich.
4.
DeWolf, J. T., Culmo, M. P., and Lauzon, R. G. (1998). “Connecticut’s bridge infrastructure monitoring program for assessment.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 4(2), 86–90.
5.
Ferguson, P. ( 1973). Reinforced concrete fundamentals, Wiley, New York.
6.
Gogel, M. E. ( 2001). Inspection and rating system for tubular steel pedestrian bridges, Univ. of Colorado at Denver, Denver.
7.
Moorty, S., and Roeder, C. (1992). “Temperature dependent bridge movements.” J. Struct. Eng., 118(4), 1090–1105.
8.
Moses, F., Lebet, J. P., and Bez, R. (1994). “Applications of field testing to bridge evaluation.” J. Struct. Eng., 120(6), 1754–1763.
9.
Rens, K. L., Nogueira, C. L., Neiman, Y. M., Gruber, T., and Johnson, L. E. (1999). “Bridge management system for the City and County of Denver.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., 4(4), 131–136.
10.
Saraf, V., and Nowak, A. S. (1998). “Proofload testing of deteriorated steel girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 3(2), 82–89.
11.
Wang, C., and Salmon, C. ( 1998). Reinforced concrete design, Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, Calif.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 18 • Issue 4 • November 2004
Pages: 205 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 ASCE.
History
Received: Sep 17, 2002
Accepted: Apr 27, 2004
Published online: Oct 15, 2004
Published in print: Nov 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.