TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jan 1, 2007

Mathematical Programming Approaches for Modeling Water Rights Allocation

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 133, Issue 1

Abstract

Three methods for modeling allocation of water rights under different types of water rights systems are presented. The priority-based maximal multiperiod network flow (PMMNF) programming method searches for optimal allocations over the whole river basin and multiple periods, strictly preserving priority order by sequential programming. PMMNF is a flexible method that can be applied under prior, riparian and public water regimes with priorities determined by different criteria. The modified riparian water rights allocation (MRWRA) approach for water allocation under a riparian rights system is a special form of PMMNF, which assigns senior priorities to the basic water demands of all riparian landowners and junior priorities to their surplus demands. MRWRA recognizes that, an upstream riparian has the privilege to take water but should constrain its diversions for surplus demands to meet the basic needs of downstream riparian demands. The lexicographic minimax water shortage ratios method is a technique for water allocation under a public water rights regime adopting the lexicographic minimax fairness concept, which interprets fairness as minimizing weighted water shortage ratios of all water uses and the differences among them. The weights can be set based on the “equivalent weighted water shortage ratios” rule. The proposed methods may also be applied to international basins as long as water demands and associated priorities or weights are selected to reflect relevant international water allocation principles and agreements. These approaches and their algorithms are evaluated using an illustrative application to the Amu Darya River Basin located within the Aral Sea Basin of Central Asia.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers would like to express their sincere appreciation to the anonymous referees and the editor whose insightful suggestions enhanced the quality of the paper.

References

Brooke, A., Kendrick, D., Meeraus, A., and Raman, R. (1998). GAMS—A users’ guide, GAMS Development Corporation, Washington, D.C.
Cai, X., McKinney, D. C., and Lasdon, L. S. (2001). “Piece-by-piece approach for solving large nonlinear water resources management models.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 127(6), 363–368.
Cai, X., McKinney, D. C., and Lasdon, L. S. (2002). “A framework for sustainability analysis in water resources management and application to the Syr Darya Basin.” Water Resour. Res., 38(6), 21/1–21/14.
Cech, T. V. (2002). Principles of water resources, history, development, management, and policy, Wiley, New York, 200–206.
Dellapenna, J. W. (1994). “The regulated riparian version of the ASCE model water code: The third way to allocate water.” Water Resour. Bull., 30(2), 197–204.
Dellapenna, J. W. (2000). “The importance of getting names right: The myth of markets for water.” William and Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, 25, 317–377.
Dellapenna, J. W., and Stephen, E. D. (2002). “Water law doctrines as applied to Georgia Water Law.” Rep. Prepared for the Comprehensive State Water Plan Joint Study Committee, Atlanta, ⟨http://www.cviog.uga.edu/water/whitepapers/waterlawdoctrines.pdf⟩ (Dec. 28, 2002).
Fang, L., Wang, L., and Hipel, K. W. (2005). “Securing fair water allocation in the Aral Sea Basin.” Systems and human science—For safety, security, and dependability, T. Arai, S. Yamamoto, and K. Makino, eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 159–170.
Fredericks, J. W., Labadie, J. W., and Altenhofen, J. M. (1998). “Decision support system for conjunctive stream-aquifer management.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 124(2), 69–78.
Giordano, M. A., and Wolf, A. T. (2001). “Incorporating equity into international water agreements.” Social Justice Research, 14(4), 349–366.
Green, G. P., and Hamilton, J. R. (2000). “Water allocation, transfer and conservation: Links between policy and hydrology.” Water Resources Development, 16(2), 197–208.
Hsu, N., and Cheng, K. (2002). “Network flow optimization model for basin-scale water supply planning.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 128(2),102–112.
International Law Association. (1967). “The Helsinki Rules on the uses of the waters of international rivers.” Rep. of the Committee on the Uses of the Waters of International Rivers, adopted by the Int. Law Association at 52nd Conf., Helsinki, Finland, ⟨http://www.internationalwaterlaw.org/IntlDocs/Helsinki_Rules.htm⟩ (Oct. 20, 2002).
Israel, M. S., and Lund, J. R. (1999). “Priority preserving unit penalties in network flow modeling.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 125(4), 205–214.
Loucks, D. P., Stedinger, J. R., and Douglas, H. (1981). Water resources systems planning and analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Luss, H. (1999). “On equitable resource allocation problems: A lexicographic minimax approach.” Oper. Res., 47(3), 361–378.
McKinney, D. C. (2003). “Cooperative management of transboundary water resources in Central Asia.” ⟨http://www.ce.utexas.edu/prof/mckinney/papers/aral/CentralAsiaWater-McKinney.pdf⟩ (Aug. 20, 2003).
McKinney, D. C., Cai, X., Rosegrant, M. W., Ringler, C., and Scott, C. A. (1999). “Modeling water resources management at the basin level: Review and future directions.” SWIM paper no. 6, International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
McKinney, D. C., and Karimov, A. K. (1997). “Report on model development: Aral Sea regional allocation model for the Amu Darya River.” Technical Rep. Prepared for Central Asia Mission, U.S. Agency for International Development, Almaty, Kazakstan.
Micklin, P. P. (1991). “The water management crisis in Soviet Central Asia.” The Carl Beck papers in Russian and Eastern-European studies, no. 105, Center for Russian and Eastern European Studies, Univ. of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.
Miller, K. A., Rhodes, S. L., and MacDonnell, L. J. (1997). “Water allocation in a changing climate: Institutions and adaptation.” Clim. Change, 35(2), 157–177.
Murtagh, B. A., Saunders, M. A., Murray, W., Gill, P. E., Raman, R., and Kalvelagen, E. (2002). GAMS/MINOS: A solver for large-scale nonlinear optimization problems, GAMS Development Corporation, Washington, D.C.
Ogryczak, W., Sliwinski, T., and Wierzbicki, A. (2003). “Fair resource allocation schemes and network dimensioning problems.” Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology, 3, 34–42.
Raskin, P., Hansen, E., Zhu, Z., Iwra, M., and Stavisky, D. (1992). “Simulation of water supply and demand in the Aral Sea region.” Water Int., 17(2), 55–67.
Savenije, H. H. G., and Van der Zaag, P. (2000). “Conceptual framework for the management of shared river basins: With special reference to the SADC and EU.” Water Policy, 2(1–2), 9–45.
Seyam, I., Savenije, H. H. G., Aerts, J., and Schepel, M. (2000). “Algorithms for water resources distribution in international river basins.” Phys. Chem. Earth, Part B, 25(3), 309–314.
Tu M., Hsu, N., and Yeh, W. W.-G. (2003). “Optimization of reservoir management and operation with hedging rules.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 129(2), 86–97.
United Nations (UN). (1997). “Convention on the law of the non-navigational uses of international watercourses.” U.N. Doc. A/51/869, adopted by the UN General Assembly in resolution 51/229 of May 21, 1997, ⟨http://www.un.org/law/ilc/texts/nnavfra.htm⟩ (Oct. 20, 2002).
United Nations/World Water Assessment Programme (UN/WWAP). (2003). UN World Water Development Rep.: Water for People, Water for Life, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and Berghahn Books, Paris.
Van der Zaag, P., Seyam, I. M., and Savenije, H. H. G. (2002). “Towards measurable criteria for the equitable sharing of international water resources.” Water Policy, 4(1), 19–32.
Wang, L., Fang, L., and Hipel, K. W. (2003) “Water resources allocation: A cooperative game theoretic approach.” J. Environmental Informatics, 2(2), 11–22.
Wang, L., Fang, L., and Hipel, K. W. (2004). “Lexicographic minimax approach to fair water allocation problems.” Proc. 2004 IEEE Int. Conf. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, The Hague, The Netherlands, 1038–1043.
Wolf, A. T. (1999). “Criteria for equitable allocations: The heart of international water conflict.” Natural Resources Forum, 23(1), 3–30.
Wurbs, R. A. (2001). “Assessing water availability under a water rights priority system.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 127(4), 235–243.
Yeh, W. W-G. (1985). “Reservoir management and operation models: A state-of-the-art review.” Water Resour. Res., 21(12), 1798–1818.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 133Issue 1January 2007
Pages: 50 - 59

History

Received: Mar 3, 2005
Accepted: Jan 30, 2006
Published online: Jan 1, 2007
Published in print: Jan 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Lizhong Wang [email protected]
Research Associate, Dept. of Systems Design Engineering, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo ON, Canada N2L 3G1. E-mail: [email protected]
Liping Fang [email protected]
Professor, Chair, Dept. of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Ryerson Univ., Toronto ON, Canada M5B 2K3. E-mail: [email protected]
Keith W. Hipel [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Systems Design Engineering, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo ON, Canada N2L 3G1 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share