Case Study: Multicriteria Assessment of Drought Mitigation Measures
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 131, Issue 6
Abstract
The proactive approach to drought management is based on measures devised and implemented before, during, and after the drought event, according to a planning strategy rather than within an emergency framework. The measures taken before the initiation of a drought event consist of long-term measures oriented to improve the reliability of the water supply system to meet future demands under drought conditions. The measures taken after a drought is forecasted or starts are short-term measures that try to mitigate the impacts of the particular drought on the basis of a contingency plan. Selection of the preferable mix of long-term and short-term measures can be accomplished through multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA), which enables the comparison of alternatives on the basis of appropriate quantitative and/or qualitative assessment criteria. In this paper, a methodology for the assessment of drought mitigation measures based on a combined use of simulation models and MCDA is applied to a water supply system located in eastern Sicily, Italy. The system comprises two reservoirs and several diversion dams and hydropower plants, and its main uses are irrigation and municipal water supply. First, a simulation model is applied to evaluate the effects of several drought mitigation alternatives consisting of a mix of long- and short-term measures. Then, MCDA is applied to rank the different alternatives on the basis of economic, environmental, and social criteria, taking into account the process of coalition formation among stakeholders on the basis of their different point of view. The results confirm the applicability of the proposed multicriteria methodology for a transparent comparison of drought mitigation measures to be adopted as a support for the decision making process.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The methodology and its application to the case study have been developed with financial support from the European Project WAM-ME, Water Resources Management under Drought Conditions: Criteria and Tools for Conjunctive Use of Conventional and Marginal Waters in Mediterranean Regions. Within the Project, the research activity has involved partners from Cyprus, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, and Spain. In particular, the research staff at the Polytechnic University of Valencia (Spain), led by Prof. J. Andreu, has applied the proposed methodology to a Spanish case study. The research has also been partially funded by the national projects “Gestione integrata e sostenibile delle risorse idriche in differenti contesti territoriali” (MIUR-CNR GENESTO) and “Tecnologie innovative di controllo, trattamento e manutenzione per la soluzione dell’emergenza acqua” (PON-AQUATEC).
References
Andreu, J. (2003). “Work Package n. 7: Report by Spanish partner (Polytechnic University of Valencia).” Rep. of the WAM-ME European Project, Polytechnic Univ. of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Andreu, J., Capilla, J., and Sanchis, E. (1996). “AQUATOOL: A generalized decision support system for water-resources planning and operational management.” J. Hydrol., 177, 269–291.
Duckstein, L. (1983). “Trade-offs between various mitigation measures.” Coping with droughts, V. Yevjevich et al., eds., Water Resources, Littleton, Colo.
Dziegielewski, B. (2003). “Long-term and short-term measures for coping with drought.” Tools for drought mitigation in mediterranean regions, G. Rossi et al., eds., Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 319–339.
Flug, M. P. E., Seits, H. L. H., and Scott, J. F. (2000). “Multicriteria decision analysis applied to Glen Canyon dam.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 126(5), 270–276.
Gershon, M., Duckstein, L., and McAniff, R. (1982). “Multiobjective river basin planning with qualitative criteria.” Water Resour. Res., 18(2), 193–202.
Goicoechea, A., Hansen, D. R., and Duckstein, L. (1982). Multiobjective decision analysis with engineering and business applications, Wiley, New York.
Goicoechea, A., Stakhiv, E. Z., and Li, F. (1992). “Experimental evaluation of multiple criteria decision models for application to water resources planning.” Water Resour. Bull., 28(1), 89–102.
Hobbs, B. F., Chankong, V., Hamadeh, W., and Stakhiv, E. Z. (1992). “Does choice of multicriteria method matter? An experiment in water resources planning.” Water Resour. Res., 28(7), 1767–1779.
Loucks, D. P., and Gladwell, J. S. (1999). Sustainability criteria for water resources system, Cambridge Univ., Cambridge, U.K.
Munda, G. (1995). Multicriteria evaluation in a fuzzy environment: Theory and applications in ecological economics, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 93–191.
Munda, G., Parruccini, M., and Rossi, G. (1998). “Multicriteria evaluation methods in renewable resource management: Integrated water management under drought conditions.” Multicriteria analysis for land-use management, E. Beinat and P. Nijkamp, eds., Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 79–93.
Nijkamp, P., and Vos, J. B. (1977). “A multicriteria analysis for water resources and land use development.” Water Resour. Res., 13(3), 513–518.
Raju, K. S., and Pillai, C. R. S. (1999). “Multicriterion decision making in river basin planning and development.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 112, 249–257.
Rossi, G. (2000). “Drought mitigation measures: A comprehensive framework.” Drought and drought mitigation in Europe, J. V. Vogt and F. Somma, eds., Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 233–246.
Simonovic, S. P. (1996) “Decision support systems for sustainable management of water resources. 1: General principles.” Water Int., 21(4), 223–232.
Stewart, T. J., and Scott, L. (1995). “A scenario-based framework for multicriteria decision analysis in water resources planning.” Water Resour. Res., 31(11), 2835–2843.
Wilhite, D. A., ed. (2000). Drought: A global assessment, Vol. 2, Routledge, London.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future, Oxford Univ., Oxford, U.K.
Yin, Y. Y., Huang, G. H., and Hipel, K. W. (1999). “Fuzzy relation analysis for multicriteria water resources management.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 125(1), 41–47.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 131 • Issue 6 • November 2005
Pages: 449 - 457
Copyright
© 2005 ASCE.
History
Received: Feb 25, 2004
Accepted: May 3, 2005
Published online: Nov 1, 2005
Published in print: Nov 2005
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.