Optimal Location of Infiltration-Based Best Management Practices for Storm Water Management
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 131, Issue 6
Abstract
A distributed hydrologic model of an urban watershed in the northeast United States was developed and combined with a genetic algorithm to determine the optimal location of infiltration-based best management practices (BMPs) for storm water management. The distributed, event-based hydrologic model integrates the curve number method with a distributed hydrologic network model of the catchment using a system of 4,533 hydrologic response units (HRUs). The infiltration-based BMP was conceptualized as an element that alters the infiltration/runoff partitioning of the HRUs in which it was applied. The results indicate that the optimal location and number of BMPs is a complex function of watershed network connectivity, flow travel time, land use, distance to channel, and contributing area, requiring an optimization approach of the type introduced here. A Pareto frontier describing the trade-off between the number of BMPs, representing project cost, and watershed flooding was developed.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The research described in this article has been funded in part by a United States Environmental Protection Agency STAR grant (R830654). This paper has not been subjected to the agency’s required peer and policy review; therefore, it does not necessarily reflect the views of the agency, and so no endorsement should be inferred. We thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions, and we would like to especially thank Ranji Ranjithan, Paul Kirshen, Steve Chapra, John Durant, and Steve Levine for their support and guidance during this project.
References
Abbott, M. B., and Refsgaard, J. C. (2002). Distributed hydrological modeling, Kluwer Academic, Boston.
Behera, P. K., Papa, F., and Adams, B. J. (1999). “Optimization of regional storm-water management systems.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 125(2), 107–114.
Beven, K. J. (2001). Rainfall-runoff modeling: The primer, Wiley, New York.
Brander, K. E., Owen, K. E., and Potter, K. W. (2004). “Modeled impacts of development type on runoff volume and infiltration performance.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 40(4), 961–969.
Chow, V. T., Maidment, D. R., and Mays, L. W. (1988). Applied hydrology, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Elliot, A. H. (1998). “Model for preliminary catchment-scale planning of urban stormwater quality controls.” J. Environ. Manage., 52, 273–288.
Ferguson, Bruce K. (1991). “The failure of detention and the future of stormwater design.” Landscape Architecture, 81(12), 76–79.
Haith, D. A. (2003). “Systems analysis, TMDLs and watershed approach.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 129(4), 257–260.
Harrell, L. J., and Ranjithan, S. R. (2003). “Detention pond design and land use planning for watershed management.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 129(2), 98–106.
Holman-Dodds, J. K., Bradley, A. A., and Potter, K. W. (2003). “Evaluation of hydrologic benefits of infiltration based urban storm water management.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 39(1), 205–215.
Lee, J. G., and Heaney, J. P. (2003). “Estimation of urban imperviousness and its impacts on storm water systems.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 129(5), 419–426.
Mays, L. W., and Bedient, P. B. (1982). “Model for optimal size and location of detention.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 108(3), 270–285.
O’Callaghan, J. F., and Mark, D. M. (1984). “The extraction of drainage from digital elevation data.” Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process., 28, 328–344.
Perez-Pedini, C. (2004). “Optimal location of BMPs for stormwater management.” MS thesis, Tufts Univ., Medford, Mass.
Potter, K. W. (2004). “Managing stormwater at the source.” Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Art and Letters, 90, 67–73.
Prince Georges County, Maryland. (1999). “Low impact development design strategies: An integrated design approach.” Dep. of Environmental Resources Programs and Planning Division, Largo, Md.
Sample, D. J., Heaney, J. P., Wright, L. T., and Koustas, R. (2001). “Geographic information systems, decision support systems, and urban stormwater management.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 127(3), 155–161.
Soil Conservation Service (SCS). (1986). “Urban hydrology for small watersheds.” Technical Release 55, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
Srivastava, P., Hamlett, J. M., and Robillard, P. D. (2003). “Watershed optimization of agricultural best management practices: Continuous simulation versus design storms.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 39(5), 1043–1054.
Srivastava, P., Hamlett, J. M., Robillard, P. D., and Ray, R. L. (2002). “Watershed optimization of best management practices using AnnAGNPS and a genetic algorithm.” Water Resour. Res., 38(3), 3.1–3.14.
Tarboton, D. G. (1997). “A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models.” Water Resour. Res., 33(2), 309–319.
Veith, T. L., Wolfe, M. L., and Heatwole, C. D. (2003). “Optimization procedure for cost effective BMP placement at a watershed scale.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 39(6), 1331–1343.
Yeh, C.-H., and Labadie, J. W. (1997). “Multiobjective watershed-level planning of storm-water detention basins.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 123(6), 336–343.
Zhen, X. Y., Yu, S. L., and Lin, J.-Y. (2004). “Optimal location and sizing of stormwater basins at watershed scale.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 130(4), 339–347.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2005 ASCE.
History
Received: Jun 29, 2004
Accepted: May 3, 2005
Published online: Nov 1, 2005
Published in print: Nov 2005
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.