TECHNICAL PAPERS
Dec 15, 2003

Group Decision Making in Water Resources Planning Using Multiple Objective Analysis

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 130, Issue 1

Abstract

Water resources planning involves groups or institutions having differing objectives, responsibilities, and interests, and it requires collaboration for conflict resolution. In this paper, the characteristics and modeling requirements of conflict resolution in water resources planning are discussed. A method based on compound models is proposed for regional water resources planning involving multiple decision makers. This method combines modeling techniques such as multiobjective analysis and multicriteria and multiparticipant decision methods, and supports plan generation and evaluation, individual and group preference elicitation, and negotiation taking aim at a consensus plan. The method demonstrates that computer models can be effective and useful for group decisions in water resources planning by facilitating information sharing, participative model development, and learning processes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Adams, A. (2001). “Decision making in multiparty regional water conflict.” Proc., Symp. on Integrated Water Resources Management, International Association of Hydro Science (IAHS), Davis, Calif., 19–24.
Cai, X. (1994). “Intelligent group decision support system for regional water resources planning and management.” MS thesis, Tsinghua Univ., P. R. China.
China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (CIWRHR). (1994). Water resources management in North China, Vol. (Main Rep.), Vol. 2 (Model and Data) and Vol. 3 (Subreports). United Nations Development Program and State Science and Technology Commission, CPR/88/068, Beijing, China.
Cohon, J. R. (1978). Multiobjective programming and planning, Academic, New York.
Desanctis, G., and Gallpe, R. B.(1987). “A foundation for study of group decision-making support systems.” Manage. Sci., 33(5), 589–609.
Gass, S. I.(1984). “Decision-aiding models: Validation, assessment and related issues for polices analysis.” Oper. Res., 31(4), 601–631.
Gregg, F. (1990). “Institutional aspects of managing conflicts.” Proc., Managing Water-Related Conflicts: The Engineer’s Role, W. Viessman Jr. and E. T. Smerdon, eds. ASCE, New York, 1–14.
Griggs, R. (2002). “The cultural dimensions of environmental decision-making.” Working paper with Independent Projects Trust (IPT), South Africa.
Haimes, Y. Y. (2000). “Water system complexity and the misuse of modeling and optimization.” Water Resources Update, No. 116, Univ. Council on Water Resources (UCOWP), Carbondale, Ill., 36–41.
Haimes, Y., and Hall, W.(1974). “Multiobjective in water resources systems analysis: The Surrogate Worth Trade-Off Method.” Water Resour. Res., 10(4), 615–624.
Holsapple, C. W., and Whinston, A. B. (1987). Business expert systems, Irwin, Homewood, Ill.
Jarke, M.(1986). “Knowledge sharing and negotiation support in multiperson decision support system.” Decision Support Sys., 2(1), 193–102.
Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value trade-offs, Wiley, New York.
Lord, W. B., and Kenney, D. S. (1995). “Evaluation of two institutional arrangements for resolving interstate water disputes.” Water quantity/quality management and conflict resolution, A. Dinar and E. T. Loehman, eds., Praeger, Westport, Conn., 5–19.
Lord, W. B., Wallace, M. G., and Shillito, R. M. (1990). “Linked models for Indian water rights disputes.” Proc., Managing Water-Related Conflicts: The Engineer’s Role, W. Viessman Jr. and E. T. Smerdon, eds., ASCE, New York, 180–193.
Loucks, D. P. (1990). “Analytical aids to conflict management, Institutional Aspects of Managing Conflicts.” Proc., Managing Water-Related Conflicts: The Engineer’s Role, W. Viessman Jr. and E. T. Smerdon, eds., ASCE, New York, 23–37.
Loucks, D. P. (2000). “Achieving a concensus in the restoration of the Everglades: A challenge for shared vision modelers.” Proc., 27th Annual Water Resource Planning and Management Conf., ASCE, Reston, Va.
Lund, J. R.(1994). “Utility theory violations by multicriteria hierarchical weighting methods.” Civ. Eng. Sys., 11, 197–207.
Lund, J. R., and Palmer, R. N. (1997). “Water resource system modeling for conflict resolution.” Water Resources Update, No. 108, Univ. Council on Water Resources (UCOWR), Carbondale, Ill.
Michelsen, A. M., and Bargur, J. (1993). “Macro-economic based multiple objective analysis for regional water resources planning, development and management in North China.” United Nations Inter-regional Seminar on Technologies for Applications to Water Resources Policy, Development and Management. Proc., United Nations Dept. for Development Support and Management and Environment Program and Ministry of Water Resources and State Science and Technology Committee, Beijing, 1–27.
Michelsen, A. M., Bargur, J., Wang, H., Weng, W., Cai, X., and Shi., H. (1994). “Multiple objective analysis concepts, formulation and results.” Water Resources Management in North China, Chap. 7, United Nations Development Program and Research Management Center of North China, Final Rep., R. M. North, Z. Chen, and X. Xu, eds., Beijing, 1–54.
Palmer, R. (1999). “Modeling water resources opportunities, challenges, and trade-offs: The use of shared vision modeling for negotiation and conflict resolution.” Preparing for the 21st Century, Proc., 26th Annual Water Resource Planning and Management Conf., ASCE, Reston, Va.
Saaty, T. L.(1977). “A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structure,” J. Math. Psychol., 15, 234–281.
Sheer, D. P., Baeck, M. L., and Wright, J. R.(1989). “The computer negotiator.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 81(2), 68–73.
Steuer, R. E. (1986). Multiple criteria optimization: Theory, software and testing examples in decision support systems, Wiley, New York.
Stewart, T. J., and Scott, L.(1995). “A scenario-based framework for multicriteria decision analysis in water resources planning.” Water Resour. Res., 31(11), 2835–2843.
Starr, M., and Zeleny, M., eds. (1977). Multiple criteria decision making, North-Holland, New York.
Thiessen, E. M., and Loucks, D. P.(1992). “Corporating computer assisted negotiation of multiple objective water resources conflicts.” Water Resour. Bull., 28(1), 163–177.
Viessman, W., Jr., and E. T. Smerdon (1990). “Managing water-related conflicts: The engineer’s role.” Proc., Engineering Foundation Conf., ASCE, New York.
Watabe, K., Holsapple, C. W., and Whinston, A. B.(1992). “Coordinator support in a Nemawashi Decision Process.” Decision Support Sys., 8(3), 85–98.
Watkins, D. W., and McKinney, D. C.(1995). “Recent developments associated with decision support systems in water resources.” Rev. Geophys.,33, 941–948, Part 2, Suppl. S.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 130Issue 1January 2004
Pages: 4 - 14

History

Received: Jan 17, 2001
Accepted: Dec 5, 2002
Published online: Dec 15, 2003
Published in print: Jan 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ximing Cai
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801.
Leon Lasdon
Dept. of Management Science and Information Systems, The Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.
Ari M. Michelsen
Dept. of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share