New Federalism and Social and Environmental Goals
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 115, Issue 1
Abstract
The basic shift in intergovernmental relationships that has occurred since 1975 has important implications for the achievement of social and environmental goals that guide the management of water resources. These changes, primarily in financial responsibilities, have both positive and negative effects. They will tend to enhance the economic efficiency of water projects, and those projects will be more consistent with the benefit principle of financial equity. On the negative side, the new arrangements provide less opportunity to revitalize economically depressed regions and to extend services to the urban poor. Evidence suggests that economic development tends to dominate environmental quality objectives under the more decentralized relationships. Also, rational‐analytic methods are less likely to be used as the basis for decisions, and the declining federal presence has important implications for the funding of water resources research.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Burby, R., Moreau, D., and Kaiser, E. J. (1987). Financing water and sewer extensions in urban growth areas: Current practices and policy alternatives Report No. 232, Water Resour. Res. Inst. of the Univ. of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C.
2.
Caulfield, H. P. (1986). “Comments from a political science perspective.” Social and Environmental Objectives in Water Resources Planning and Management, W. Viessman and K. Schilling, eds., ASCE, Proc. of Conf. held at Santa Barbara, Calif., May 11–16, 137–141.
3.
Dommel, P. R. (1981). “Trends in intergovernmental relations: Getting less and enjoying it more (maybe).” Financing State and Local Governments in the 1980s, N. Walzer and D. L. Chicoine, eds., Oelgechlager, Gunn & Hain Publishers, Cambridge, Mass.
4.
Lord, W. B. (1986). “Evolutionary perspective on social values.” Social and Environmental Objectives in Water Resources Planning and Management, W. Viessman and K. Schilling, eds., ASCE, Proc. of Conf. held at Santa Barbara, Calif., May 11–16, 1–11.
5.
Metger, P. C. (1986). “The need for institutional modernization.” Social and Environmental Objectives in Water Resources Planning and Management, W. Viessman and K. Schilling, eds., ASCE, Proc. of Conf. held at Santa Barbara, Calif., May 11–16, 27–35.
6.
Moreau, D. H. (1986). “Capital budgeting in local governments: A process for incorporating social and environmental values in water resource projects?” Social and Environmental Objectives in Water Resources Planning and Management, W. Viessman and K. Schilling, eds., ASCE, Proc. of Conf. held at Santa Barbara, Calif., May 11–16, 142–148.
7.
Moreau, D. H., and Whittington, D. (1984). Financing water supply and wastewater services in North Carolina in the 1980s. Report No. 212, Water Resour. Res. Inst. of Univ. of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C.
8.
Snyder, T. P., and Stegman, M. A. (1986). Paying for growth. The Urban Land Inst.
9.
Snyder, T. P., Whittington, D., and Hillstrom, D. (1984). Water projects in North Carolina: The state role. Report No. 220, Water Resour. Res. Inst. of Univ. of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C.
10.
Temple, Barker, Sloane, Inc. (1982). Final descriptive summary: Survey of operating and financial characteristics of community water systems. U.S. EPA Report, Washington, D.C.
11.
U.S. Dept. of Commerce. (1984). Finances of special districts—1982 census of governments. 4(2), U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
12.
U.S. Water Resources Council. (1973). “Water and related land resources: Establishment of principles and standards for planning.” Fed. Reg., 38(Sept. 10), 27448–24869.
13.
U.S. Water Resources Council. (1983). “Economic and environmental principles and guidelines for water and related land resources implemental studies.” Fed. Reg., Mar. 10.
14.
Walker, W. R. (1986). “Legal problems related to implementation of planning standards.” Social and Environmental Objectives in Water Resources Planning and Management, W. Viessman and K. Schilling, eds., ASCE, Proc. of Conf. Held at Santa Barbara, Calif., May 11–16, 126–128.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jan 1, 1989
Published in print: Jan 1989
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.