Impact Evaluation Procedures: Theory, Practice, and Needs
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 115, Issue 1
Abstract
Over the past 50 years, planning procedures and analytical methods for evaluating social and environmental effects have played an increasingly important role in federal water planning. Yet the impact of these procedures on decision making has been less than what their proponents hope for. Among the reasons for this are the inability of many methods to provide the information most needed by decision makers and insufficient education of potential users. A recent Engineering Foundation conference addressed social and environmental goals in water management. This paper summarizes conclusions reached there regarding the theory, practice, and needs of evaluation procedures. One conclusion is that recent changes in federal water planning guidelines are but a pragmatic adaptation to the way planning actually takes place and that multiobjective methods will continue to play a role. A recommendation is that these planning procedures be adapted to the new federal cost‐sharing rules and for use in conflict management.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Ahmad, Y. J., ed. (1982). Analysing the options. United Nations Environmental Programme, Studies 5, Nairobi, Kenya.
2.
Bidol, P. A. (1986). “Conflict resolution models.” Social and environmental objectives in water resources planning and management. W. Viessman, Jr. and K. E. Schilling, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 72–78.
3.
Bidol, P. A., et al. (1986). “Workshop on conflict resolution.” Social and environmental objectives in water resources planning and management. W. Viessman, Jr. and K. E. Schilling, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 278–290.
4.
Brown, C. A. (1984). “The central Arizona water control study: A success story for multiobjective planning and public involvement.” Water Resour. Bull. 20(3), 331–338.
5.
Caulfield, Jr., H. P. (1986). “Comments from a political science perspective.” Social and environmental objectives in water resources planning and management. W. Viessman, Jr. and K. E. Schilling, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 137–141.
6.
Chankong, V., and Haimes, Y. Y. (1983). Multiobjective decision making: Theory and methodology. North‐Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
7.
Cohon, J. L. (1978). Multiobjective programming and planning. Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
8.
Deason, J. P. (1984). “Water resources planning in the new principles and guidelines.” Multiobjective analysis in water resources. Y. Y. Haimes and D. J. Alle, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 37–45.
9.
Delli Priscoli, J. (1986). “Group process techniques.” Social and environmental objectives in water resources planning and management. W. Viessman, Jr. and K. E. Schilling, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 154–168.
10.
Dysart, B. C. III (1986). “Measurement methods for decision making.” Social and environmental objectives in water resources planning and management. W. Viessman, Jr. and K. E. Schilling, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 184–198.
11.
Eastman, P. (1986). “Washington, D.C. area water supply.” Social and environmental objectives in water resources planning and management. W. Viessman, Jr. and K. E. Schilling, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 57–71.
12.
“Economic and environmental principles and guidelines for water and related land resources implementation studies.” (1983). Federal Register, U.S. Water Resources Council, Washington, D.C.
13.
Fischhoff, B. L., Slovic, P., and Lichtenstein, S. (1979). “Knowing what you want: measuring labile values.” Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior, T. Wallsten, ed., Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J.
14.
Gershon, M., and Duckstein, L. (1983). “Multiobjective approaches to river basin planning.” J. Water Res. Plng. and Mgmt., ASCE, 109(1), 13–28.
15.
Giocoechea, A., Hansen, D., and Duckstein, L. (1982). Introduction to multiobjective analysis with engineering and business applications. John wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
16.
Grayman, W. M., et al. (1986). “Workshop on evaluative criteria.” Social and environmental objectives in water resources planning and management. W. Viessman, Jr. and K. E. Schilling, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 265–270.
17.
Haimes, Y. Y. (1988). “Alternatives to the precommensuration of costs, benefits, risks, and time.” The role of the social‐behavioral sciences in water resources management. D. D. Baumann and Y. Y. Haimes, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 269–293.
18.
Hobbs, B. F. (1984). Discussion of “Multiobjective approaches to river basin planning.” by M. Gershon and L. Duckstein. J. Water Res. Plng. and Mgmt., ASCE, 110(1), 123–124.
19.
Hobbs, B. F. (1985). “Choosing how to choose: Comparing amalgamation methods for environmental impact assessment.” Envir. Impact Assessment Review. 5(4), 301–319.
20.
Hobbs, B. F. (1986). “What can we learn from experiments in multiobjective analysis?” IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. SMC‐16(3), 384–394.
21.
Hobbs, B. F., and Grayman, W. M. (1986). “Dealing with social and environmental evaluative criteria.” Social and environmental objectives in water resources planning and management. W. Viessman, Jr. and K. E. Schilling, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 308–324.
22.
Hobbs, B. F., et al. (1984). “Comparisons of methods for evaluating multiattributed alternatives: Results of the BNL‐NRC siting methods project.” Improving impact assessment: Increasing the relevance and utilization of technical and scientific information. S. Hart et al., eds., Westview Press, Boulder, Colo.
23.
Hufschmidt, M. M., and Hyman, E. L., eds. (1982). Economic approaches to natural resources and environmental quality analysis. Tycooly International Publishing Company, Dublin, Ireland.
24.
Ingram, H. (1972). “The changing decision rules in the politics of water development.” Water Resour. Bull. 8(6), 1177–1188.
25.
Jackson Lake safety of dams study, newsletter. (1983). U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, Co.
26.
Koelzer, V. A. (1986). “The relationship between planning standards and goals.” Social and environmental objectives in water resources planning and management. W. Viessman, Jr. and K. E. Schilling, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 96–106.
27.
Lord, W. B. (1981). “Objectives and constraints in federal water resources planning.” Water Resour. Bull. 17(6), 1060–1065.
28.
Lord, W. B. (1986). “Evolutionary perspective on social values.” Social and environmental objectives in water resources planning and management. W. Viessman, Jr. and K. E. Schilling, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 1–11.
29.
Loucks, D. P. (1986). “Analytical methods for multiobjective planning.” Social and environmental objectives in water resources planning and management. W. Viessman, Jr. and K. E. Schilling, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 169–183.
30.
Lowi, T. J. (1964). “American business, public policy, case studies, and political theory.” World Politics 16(4), 677–715.
31.
Lyon, W. A. (1986). “How adequate are current standards?” Social and environmental objectives in water resources planning and management. W. Viessman, Jr. and K. E. Schilling, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 149–153.
32.
Maass, A., et al. (1966). Design of water‐resource systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
33.
McAllister, D. M. (1980). Evaluation in environmental planning. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, Mass.
34.
Mitchell, R. C., and Carson, R. T. (1988). “How far along the learning curve is the contingent evaluation method?” The role of the social‐behavioral sciences in water resources management. D. D. Baumann and Y. Y. Haimes, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 65–98.
35.
Moreau, D. H. (1986). “Capital budgeting in local governments: A process for incorporating social and environmental values in water resource projects?” Social and environmental objectives in water resources planning and management. W. Viessman, Jr. and K. E. Schilling, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 142–148.
36.
“Policies, standards, and procedures in the formulation, evaluation, and review of plans for use and development of water and related land resources.” (1962). Senate Document 87–97, U.S. Water Resources Council, Washington, D.C.
37.
Report to the Federal Inter‐Agency River Basin Committee: Proposed practices for economic analysis of river basin projects. (1958). U.S. Inter‐Agency Committee on Water Resources, Washington, D.C.
38.
Report to the Water Resources Council by the Special Task Force: Procedures for the evaluation of water and related land resource projects. (1969). U.S. Water Resources Council, Washington, D.C.
39.
Sassone and Schaeffer (1978). Cost‐benefit analysis: A handbook. Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
40.
Schad, T. M. (1986). “Present policies and practices.” Social and environmental objectives in water resources planning and management. W. Viessman, Jr. and K. E. Schilling, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 12–18.
41.
Schilling, K. E. (1986). “Financing.” Social and environmental objectives in water resources planning and management. W. Viessman, Jr. and K. E. Schilling, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 199–205.
42.
Shabman, L. (1988). “Economics, economists, and water policy advising.” The role of the social‐behavioral sciences in water resources management. D. D. Baumann and Y. Y. Haimes, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 113–28.
43.
Sharefkin, M., Shechter, M., and Kneese, A. (1984). “Impacts, costs and techniques for mitigation of contaminated groundwater: A review.” Water Resour. Res., 16(12), 1771–1784.
44.
Stakhiv, E. Z. (1986). “Achieving social and environmental objectives in water resources planning.” Social and environmental objectives in water resources planning and management. W. Viessman, Jr. and K. E. Schilling, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 107–125.
45.
Stakhiv, E. Z. (1987). “Environmental analysis in water resources planning.” Water for the future: Water resources development in perspective. W. O. Wunderlich and J. E. Prins, eds., A. A. Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam, Netherland, 441–452.
46.
Steuer, R. E. (1986). Multiple criteria optimization: Theory, computation, and application. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
47.
“Water and related land resources: Establishment of principles and standards for planning.” (1973). Federal Register. 38, U.S. Water Resources Council, Washington, D.C.
48.
Waters, R. C. (1980). “Theory and reality in allocating federal resources to water resources development.” Water Resour. Bull. 16(2), 256–260.
49.
Weber, E. W., et al. (1979). “Papers on water resources planning in America.” J. Water Res. Plng. and Mgmt. Div., ASCE, 105(WR1), 1–161.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 115 • Issue 1 • January 1989
Pages: 2 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jan 1, 1989
Published in print: Jan 1989
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.