TECHNICAL PAPERS
Dec 1, 2006

Assessing Performance under Regulatory Evolution: A European Transit System Perspective

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 132, Issue 4

Abstract

Assessing the performance of transit systems operating under different regulatory regimes is a topic of considerable interest in the literature. The goal of this paper is to investigate the performance characteristics and factors affecting this performance for European transit systems operating in vastly different regulatory environments. The initial results of data envelopment analysis application indicate that privately operated systems tend to be more efficient while publicly operated systems tend to be more effective; transport operators in cities where open entry form of competition has been introduced were found to perform both efficiently and effectively. Further, as the Tobit regressions focused on the effect of ownership indicate, most systems in the sample demonstrate a positive trend in both efficiency and effectiveness, a finding with important practical implications for financially strained systems.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Alexandersson, G., Hulten, S., and Folster, S. (1998). “The effects of competition in Swedish local bus services.” J. Transp. Econ. Policy, 32(2), 203–219.
Anderson, S. C., and Fielding, G. L. (1982). “Comparative analysis of transit performance.” Final Rep. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., and Cooper, W. W. (1984). “Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis.” Manage. Sci., 30(9), 1078–1092.
Benjamin, J., and Obeng, K. (1990). “The effect of policy and background variables on total factor productivity for public transit.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 24B(1), 1–14.
Black, J. A., Paez, A., and Suthanaya, P. A. (2002). “Sustainable urban transportation: Performance indicators and some analytical approaches.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 128(4), 184–209.
Boame, A. (2003). “The technical efficiency of Canadian urban transit systems.” Transp. Res. Part E, 40(5), 401–416.
Cambini, C., and Filippini, M. (2003). “Competitive tendering and optimal size in the regional bus transportation industry: An example from Italy.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 74(1), 163–183.
Caves, D. W., and Christensen, L. R. (1988). “The importance of economies of scale, capacity utilization, and density in explaining interindustry differences in productivity growth.” The Logistics and Transportation Review, 24(1), 958–976.
Ceder, A. (2004). “New urban public transportation systems: Initiatives, effectiveness, and challenges.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 130(1), 56–65.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., and Rhodes, E. (1978). “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2/6, 429–444.
Chu, X., Fielding, G. J., and Lamar, B. W. (1992). “Measuring transit performance using data envelopment analysis.” Transp. Res., Part A, 26A(3), 223–230.
Cervero, R. (1984a). “Cost and performance impacts of transit subsidy programs.” Transp. Res., Part A, 18A(5/6), 407–413.
Cervero, R. (1984b). “Examining the performance impacts of transit operating subsidies.” J. Transp. Eng., 115(5), 467–480.
Costa, A. (1998). “Public transport efficiency and effectiveness: Metro de Madrid.” Transport networks in Europe: Concepts, analysis, and policies, K. Button, P. Nijkamp, and H. Priemus, eds., Elgar, Cheltenham, 248–264.
De Borger, B., Kerstens, K., and Costa, A. (2002). “Public transit performance: What does one learn from frontier studies?” Transport Rev., 22(1), 1–38.
Faere, R., Grosskopf, S., and Lovell, C. A. K. (1994). Production frontiers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Fielding, G. J., Babitsky, T. T., and Brenner, M. E. (1985a). “Performance evaluation for bus transit.” Transp. Res., Part A, 19A(1), 73–82.
Fielding, G. J., Brenner, M. E., and Faust, K. (1985b). “Typology for bus transit.” Transp. Res., Part A, 19A(3), 269–278.
Fielding, G. J., and Glauthier R. E., Lave, C. A. (1978). “Performance indicators for transit management.” Transportation, 7, 365–379.
Filippini, M., and Prioni, P. (2003). “The influence of ownership on the cost of bus service provision in Switzerland-an empirical illustration.” Appl. Econom., 35(6), 683–690.
Gathon, H-J. (1989). “Indicators of partial productivity and technical efficiency in the European urban transit sector.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 60(1), 43–59.
Gilbert, G., and Dajani, J. (1975). Measuring the performance of transit service, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, N.C.
Hartgen, D. T., and Segedy, J. A. (1996). “Peer groups for transit system performance.” Working Paper, Center for Interdisciplinary Transportation Studies, Univ. of North Carolina, Charlotte, N.C.
Jorgensen, F., Pedersen, P. A., and Volden, R. (1997). “Estimating the inefficiency of the Norwegian bus industry from stochastic cost frontier models.” Transportation, 24, 421–433.
Karlaftis, M. G. (2001). “Reviewing methods and findings for the supply of bus transit services.” International Journal of Transport Economics, 28 (2), 147–177.
Karlaftis, M. G. (2004). “A DEA approach for evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of urban transit systems.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 152, 354–364.
Karlaftis, M. G., and McCarthy, P. S. (1997). “Subsidy and public transit performance: A factor analytic approach.” Transportation, 24, 253–270.
Karlaftis, M. G., and McCarthy, P. S. (1999). “The effect of privatization on public transit costs.” Journal of Regulatory Economics, 16, 27–43.
Karlaftis, M. G., and Sinha, K. C. (1997). “Effects of operating subsidies in the paratransit sector.” Transportation Research Record, 1571, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 75–80.
Kerstens, K. (1996). “Technical efficiency measurement and explanation of French urban transit companies.” Transp. Res., Part A: Policy Pract., 30 (6), 431–452.
Kerstens, K. (1999). “Decomposing technical efficiency and effectiveness of French urban transport.” Annales d’ Economie et de Statistique, 54, 129–155.
Khattak, A., and Yim, Y. (2004). “Traveler response to innovative personalized demand–responsive transit in the San Francisco Bay Area.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 130(1) 42–55.
Leibenstein, H. (1966). “Allocative efficiency versus x-efficiency.” Am. Econ. Rev., 56, 392–415
MARETOPE (2003). “Managing and assessing regulatory evolution in local public transport operations in Europe.” European Research Project, coordinator TIS.PT, European Commission.
Meyer, J., and Gomez-Ibanez, J. (1981). Autos, transit, and cities, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Mizutani, F., and Nakamura, N. (1997). “Privatization of the Japan national railway: Overview of performance changes.” lnternational Journal of Transport Economics, 24(1), 75–99.
Obeng, K., and Sakana, R. (2002). “Total factor productivity decomposition, input price inefficiencies, and public transit systems.” Transp. Res. Part E, 38, 19–36.
Oum, T. H., and Yu, C. (1994). “Economic efficiency of railways and implications for public policy: A comparative study of the OECD countries railways.” J. Transp. Econ. Policy, 28(2), 121–138.
Talley, W. K. (1988). “An economic theory of the public transit firm.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 22B(1), 45–54.
Tobin, J. (1958). “Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables.” Econometrica, 26, 24–36.
Tomazinis, A. R. (1977). “A study of efficiency indicators of urban public transportation systems.” Final Rep. No. DOT-TST- 77-47, USDOT, Washington, D.C.
Tone, K., and Sawada, T. (1990). “An efficiency analysis of public vs private bus transportation enterprises.” Operational Research ’90, H. Bradley, ed., Pergamon, New York, 357–365.
Viton, P. A. (1998). “Changes in multi-mode bus transit efficiency, 1998–1992.” Transportation, 25, 1–21.
Washington, S. P., Karlaftis, M. G., and Mannering, F. L. (2003). Statistical and econometric methods for transportation data analysis, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Fla.
Wunsch, P. (1994). “Cost and efficiency of major urban transit systems in Europe.” CORE Discussion Paper 9454, Louvain-la-Neuve, UCL
Yeh, C. H., Deng, H., and Chang, Y. H. (2000). “Fuzzy multicriteria analysis for performance evaluation of bus companies.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 126, 459–473.
Zegras, C., Sussman, J., and Conklin, C. (2004). “Scenario planning for strategic regional transportation planning.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 130(1), 2–13.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 132Issue 4December 2006
Pages: 226 - 234

History

Received: Sep 16, 2005
Accepted: Feb 13, 2006
Published online: Dec 1, 2006
Published in print: Dec 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dimitrios A. Tsamboulas [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Dept. of Transportation Planning and Engineering, National Technical Univ. of Athens, 5 Iroon Polytechniou Str., Zografou Campus, Zografou, Athens GR-15773, Greece. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share