Night Delivery: Institutional Restraints
Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 109, Issue 1
Abstract
Presented is a review and analysis of night delivery as a tool for managing vehicle traffic in high density central business districts of urban areas. Data were collected in Washington, D.C., Denver, Colorado, Atlanta, Georgia, and San Francisco, California. The analysis revealed that although night delivery is practiced by few businesses, and has been suggested by several researchers as a means of traffic management, the institutional restraint to its implementation is diverse, and is particularly strong among elected officials, the police, and labor unions. Much of this resistance is due to the vested interest of those groups, rather than to the potential value of night delivery. Its unknown effect on the re‐election of public officials, extra enforcement requirements, adherence to a strong tradition of day‐time delivery among the unions, and the negative perception of all night work among union leadership, are the key institutional restraints. However, a universally transferable night delivery model is not practical in U.S. cities because of the strong and diverse delivery traditions and idiosyncrasies among the institutions of labor, local government, and business.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Barnstead, R., “Techniques for Improving Commodity Flow by Applying Current Knowledge and Technology—Panel Report,” Highway Research Board Special Report #120, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1971.
2.
Churchill, J. D. C., “Operation Moondrop: An Experiment in Out of Hours Good Delivery,” The Urban Movement of Goods, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France, Oct., 1970.
3.
Crowley, K. W., et al., Mobility of People and Goods in the Urban Environment: Facilitation of Urban Goods Movement, Office of University Research, U.S. Department of Transportation, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Va., 1974.
4.
Goeller, B. F., “Freight Transportation in Urban Areas: Issues for Research and Action,” Highway Research Board Special Report #120, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1971.
5.
Habib, P., and Crowley, K., “Evaluation of Alternate Goods Movement Programs,” Proceedings of the Intersociety Conference on Transportation, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, N.Y., July, 1976, pp. 1–5.
6.
Hemphill, J. G., and Zerega, A. M., “Policies Toward Improving Energy Efficiency in the Urban Goods Movement Sector,” Goods Transportation in Urban Areas: Proceedings of the September 7–12, 1975, Engineering Foundation Conference, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Department of Transportation, May, 1975, pp. 23–30.
7.
Manhattan Garment Center UGM Study: Off‐Hours Delivery Study, New York City Transit Authority, New York, N.Y., Sept., 1977.
8.
Noel, E. C., et al., Requirements and Specifications for Off‐Hours Delivery, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Va., Apr., 1979.
9.
Noel, E. C., et al., “A Survey of Off‐Hours Delivery,” ITE Journal, Vol. 50, No. 2, Feb., 1980.
10.
Orski, C. K., and Jakoksberg, W., “Improvements and Innovations in Urban Goods Movement,” Highway Research Board Special Report #120, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1971.
11.
Sender, S. P., “Problems Associated with Urban Goods Movement at the Local Level—A Nationwide Trucking Company,” Highway Research Board Special Report #20, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1971.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 ASCE.
History
Published online: May 1, 1983
Published in print: May 1983
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.