TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jun 1, 2006

Urban Bicycle Route Safety Rating Model Application in Jersey City, New Jersey

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 132, Issue 6

Abstract

Bicyclists consistently identify safety as one of their highest priorities in selecting bicycle routes. If transportation officials want to succeed in achieving the goal of increasing nonvehicular modes of travel, bicycle routes must be provided that are convenient and safe. In this study, a pilot study was undertaken to develop a tool to compare the relative safety of alternate bicycle routes. A multivariate logistic model was developed for urban bicycle routes based on four years of bicycle crash data from Jersey City, N.J. The resulting model meets a 90% confidence level by using various operational and physical factors (traffic volume, lane width, population density, highway classification, the presence of vertical grades, one-way streets, and truck routes) to predict the severity of an injury sustained by a bicyclist that would result from a motor vehicle crash occurring at a specific location. The model was used to rate proposed bicycle routes in Jersey City, N.J., assuming that a bicycle crash on the safest route would be the least likely to produce severe injuries. Both existing conditions and mitigated scenarios were rated and compared with field observations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Antonakos, C. L. (1994). “Environmental and travel preferences of cyclists.” Transportation Research Record 1438, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Davis, W. J. (1995). “Bicycle test route evaluation for urban road conditions.” Proc., 1995 Conf. of the Transportation Congress: Civil Engineers—Key to the World Infrastructure, ASCE, New York, 1063–1076.
Epperson, B. (1994). “Evaluating suitability of roadways for bicycle use: Toward a cycling level-of-service standard.” Transportation Research Record 1438, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA). (1994). National walking and bicycling study, FHwA, Washington, D.C.
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA). (2003). “Federal-aid highway program funding for pedestrian and bicycle facilities.” Fiscal Management Information System, ⟨http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bikeped/bipedfund.htm
Forester, J. (1983). Bicycle transportation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Goldsmith, S. (1992). “Federal Highway Administration National Bicycle and Walking Study. Case Study No. 1: Reasons why bicycling and walking are not being used more extensively as travel modes.” Publication No. FHWA-PD-92-041, ⟨http-//www.bikefed.org/PDF/CASELPDE⟩.
Harkey, D. L., Reinfurt, D. W., and Knuiman, M. (1998). “Development of the bicycle compatibility index.” Transportation Record 1636, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Hosmer, D. W., and Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression, 2nd Ed., Wiley, New York.
Landis, B. W. (1994). “Bicycle interaction hazard score: A theoretical model.” Transportation Research Record 1438, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Moritz, W. E. (1998). “Adult bicyclists in the United States, characteristics and riding experience in 1996.” Transportation Research Record 1636, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Sorton, A., and Walsh, T. (1994). “Bicycle stress level as a tool to evaluate urban and suburban bicycle compatibility.” Transportation Research Record 1438, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Vining, G. (1998). Statistical methods for engineers, International Thomson, Pacific Grove, Calif.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 132Issue 6June 2006
Pages: 499 - 507

History

Received: Jan 20, 2004
Accepted: Aug 9, 2005
Published online: Jun 1, 2006
Published in print: Jun 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Cheryl Allen-Munley
P.E.
Division of Traffic and Signals, City of Newark, 255 Central Ave., Newark, NJ 07103. E-mail: [email protected]
Janice Daniel
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, University Heights, Newark, NJ 07102. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share