Commuter Cyclist Accident Patterns in Toronto and Ottawa
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 126, Issue 1
Abstract
In this study, self-reported cyclist collision and fall information from a mail-back questionnaire was analyzed for a sample of 2,945 adult cyclists who commute to work/school in Toronto and Ottawa. Analysis focused on incident frequencies by month, time of day, location, road surface condition, and injury level. These results are presented in order to provide a valuable complement to other sources of bicycle incident data obtained primarily from emergency room hospital records. Only a small percentage of collision and fall incidents resulted in a major injury and would therefore be found in a bicycle accident database compiled from emergency room hospital records. Slightly more, 19.2 and 11.7% of the collisions in Ottawa and Toronto, respectively, were reported to police. The results of the study found that collisions were more sensitive to automobile traffic, whereas falls were more sensitive to the prevailing roadway surface conditions. There was a higher proportion of falls than collisions during the winter months in both cities. However, the severity of injuries from collisions and falls were fairly consistent across time periods. Even when the severity of collisions and falls were considered for different roadway environmental conditions and between roads and off-road, no difference was found. This analysis suggests that minor collisions and falls should be considered in accessing the safety experience of bicyclists.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Agranm, P. F., Castillo, D. N., and Winn, D. G. (1990). “Limitations of data compiled from police reports on paediatric pedestrian and bicycle motor vehicle events.” Accident Analysis and Prevention, 22(4), 361–370.
2.
Aultman-Hall, L., and Hall, F. L. (1998). “Ottawa-Carleton commuter cyclist on- and off-road incident rates.” Accident Analysis and Prevention, 30(1), 29–43.
3.
“City cycling facts.” (1994). Bicycle Transp. Res. Bull. No. 1, Toronto City Cycling Committee, Toronto.
4.
Clarke, A., and Tracey, L. (1995). “Bicycle safety-related research synthesis.” Rep. No. FHWA-RD-94-062, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
5.
Garder, P. (1994). “Bicycle accidents in Maine: An analysis.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1438, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 34–41.
6.
Morgan, J. M. ( 1994). Cycling in safety. Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Traffic Safety Division, Crowthorne.
7.
Revised bicycle policy. (1992). Ministry of Transportation Ontario, Toronto.
8.
Stutts, J., Williamson, J. E., Whitley, Th., and Sheldon, F. C. (1990). “Bicycle accidents and injuries: A pilot study comparing hospital and police-reported data.” Accident Analysis and Prevention, 22(1), 67–78.
9.
Thom, R. G., and Clayton, A. M. (1993). “Accident data requirements for improving cycling safety.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1405, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1–6.
10.
Wegman, F., and Dijkstra, A. (1988). “Safety effects of bicycle facilities: The Dutch experience.” Proc., Int. Rd. and Traffic Conf., Roads and Traffic 2000.
11.
Wessles, R. L. (1996). “Bicycle collisions in Washington State: A six-year perspective, 1988–1993.” Proc., 75th Annu. Meeting of the Transp. Res. Board.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: Dec 31, 1998
Published online: Jan 1, 2000
Published in print: Jan 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.