Traffic Conflicts in Expressway Merging
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 117, Issue 6
Abstract
The risk of collision in an expressway merging process is investigated using the traffic conflict technique. The severity of conflict in a merging event is quantified by a measure that is the inverse of the time measured to collision. To determine this measure, recordings of merging events were obtained at a merging area of an expressway in Singapore over eight periods, and the arrival times of vehicles at constantly spaced intervals were subsequently extracted in the laboratory. The errors in the data‐collection process were minimized by using two video cameras simultaneously in the recording process to increase the size of images and playing back the tapes at a lower speed during data extraction. The systematic errors in the data due to observers' bias were also estimated to facilitate data adjustment. Based on the adjusted data, the computed measure from about 200 merging events in each observation period was found to be best fitted by the mixed Weibull distribution. Using the tail end of the distribution, the probability of near‐accident per merge in each period was estimated.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Allen, B. L., Shin, B. T., and Cooper, P. J. (1978). “Analysis of Traffic Conflicts and Collisions,” Transportation Research Record 667, Transportation Research Board, pp. 67–74.
2.
Cheu, R. L. (1989). “An application of the traffic conflict technique for on‐ramp merging at expressway,” thesis presented to the National University of Singapore, at Singapore, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Engineering.
3.
Cima, B. T. (1977). “Evaluation of freeway‐merging safety as influenced by ramp‐metering control.” Transp. Res. Record 630, 41–51.
4.
Glauz, W. D., and Migletz, D. J. (1980). “Application of traffic conflict analysis at intersections,” Nat. Cooperative Hwy. Res. Program Report 219, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
5.
Hayward, J. C. (1972). “Near‐miss determination through use of a scale of danger.” Hwy. Res. Record 384, 24–35.
6.
Johnansson, G., and Rumar, K. (1971). “Driver's brake reaction time.” Human Factors, 13(1), 23–27.
7.
Proc. NATO Advanced Res. Workshop on Int. Calibration Study of Traffic Conflict Technique. (1984). E. Asmussen, ed., Springer‐Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
8.
Van de Horst, A.R.A. (1982). “The analysis of traffic behaviour by video.” Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Traffic Conflict Technique, Institute for Road Safety Research SWOV, Leidschendam, The Netherlands, 27–33.
9.
Williams, M. J. (1981). “Validity of the traffic conflict technique.” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 13, Pergamon, 133–145.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 ASCE.
History
Published online: Nov 1, 1991
Published in print: Nov 1991
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.