Acceptable Walking Distances in Central Areas
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 111, Issue 4
Abstract
Pedestrian walking distances in a central business district are mostly dependent on the arrival mode in that central business district and the layout of the transportation network on which these modes operate. Changes to the existing pattern of operations, in terms of the location of new transportation facilities or relocation of existing facilities, can have a significant impact on walking distances. However, often the prime concern has been the impact of these changes on the flow of traffic, with little or no emphasis on the pedestrians. As opposed to arbitrarily derived acceptable walking distances suggested by some researchers, an approach based on findings from a series of surveys conducted in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, is proposed. A set of characteristics that influence the distribution of walking distances is identified. Depending on the form of the distribution, the “critical” distance that would be acceptable to a group of people can be derived using simple calculus. The critical distance will be the distance at which the rate of change of the slope of the frequency distribution of the walking distance for that group of people is greatest. Since the walking distance distributions indicate the propensity to walk, they indirectly represent the actual feelings of the people. This approach also facilitates decisions regarding locations, even where information regarding walking habits is scarce or unavailable. The application of Bayesian statistical decision theory enables one to estimate the appropriate distribution and the critical distance associated with it.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Benjamin, J. R., and Cornell, C. A., Probability, Statistics and Decisions for Civil Engineers, McGraw‐Hill, Inc., New York, N.Y., 1970.
2.
Hills, P. J., “A Study of the Effects on the Environment and on Pedestrians' Movements Due to Major Traffic Restrictions in Central Liverpool,” Working Paper 76, Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, May, 1976.
3.
Morrall, J. F., “A Study of Journey to Work by Central Business District Workers,” thesis presented to the University of Waterloo, at Ontario, Canada, in 1967, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.
4.
Morrall, J. F., and Lam, W., “Bus Passenger Walking Distances and Waiting Times: A Summer‐Winter Comparison,” Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 36‐3, July, 1982, pp. 407–421.
5.
“Parking Principles,” Special Report No. 125, Highway Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1971.
6.
Petersen, S. G., “Walking Distances to Bus Stops in Washington D.C. Residential Areas,” Traffic Engineering, Dec., 1968, pp. 22–34.
7.
Pusharev, B., and Zupan, J., Urban Space for Pedestrians, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1975.
8.
Rutherford, G. S., “Use of Gravity Model for Pedestrian Travel Distribution,” Research Record No. 728, Transportation Research Board, 1978, pp. 55–59.
9.
Schoppert, D. W., and Herald, W. S., “Pedestrian Range as Related to Transit Stations and their Immediate Surroundings,” Transportation Engineering, Mar., 1978, pp. 13–15.
10.
Seneviratne, P. N., and Morrall, J. F., “Central Business District Pedestrian Route Selection Criteria,” presented at the 8th Annual Conference of the ITE (Canadian Chapter), 1983.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1985
Published in print: Jul 1985
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.