Implementation of a Feasible Control Design Process Incorporating Robustness Criteria for Wind-Excited High-Rise Buildings
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 132, Issue 1
Abstract
In this paper, a control design process incorporating robustness criteria is developed specifically for wind-excited high-rise buildings and its feasibility is experimentally verified by implementing on a four degree-of-freedom scaled (1:300) model of a high-rise building through wind tunnel tests in along-wind and across-wind directions. For feasibility toward mature application, considerations in the control design process are made as practical and thorough as possible. The main features of the proposed design process include a suitable identification scheme that can realistically model wind loads and the possible interaction between control devices and structure, as well as a systematic way of incorporating robustness criteria in the controller for reducing tracking error, rejecting noise, attenuating disturbance, and maintaining stability in the presence of system uncertainty. To account for the complexity of wind load in system identification, wind spectrum is obtained through the high-frequency force-balance tests, and the corresponding state space wind model is constructed. The nominal system with the robustness criteria employed is transformed into a generalized control problem that can be further converted into a set of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs). Consequently, strictly proper output feedback controllers are thus determined by a simpler solution procedure in searching the solution of LMIs. As observed from experimental results, the performances of proposed controllers are quite remarkable and comparable to those of classical linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) controllers. Additionally, the proposed controllers are numerically demonstrated to be more robust than classical LQG controllers under the existence of system uncertainty. This successful implementation shows that the design process and robust controllers proposed are feasible for wind-excited high-rise buildings and the resulting control performance is promising.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgment
The writers wish to express their gratitude to the National Science Council of Taiwan for financial support under Grant No. NSCTNSC 91-2211-E-032-017.
References
Balas, G. (1998). “Synthesis of controllers for the active mass driver system in the presence of uncertainty.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 27(11), 1189–1202.
Brogan, W. L. (1991). Modern control theory, Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Casciati, F., ed. (2002). Proc., 3rd World Conf. on Structural Control, Wiley, New York.
Chilali, M., and Gahinet, P. (1996). “ design with pole placement constraints: An LMI approach.” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 41(3), 358–367.
Doyle, J. C., Glover, K., Khargonekar, P., and Francis, B. (1989). “State space solutions to standard and control problems.” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 34, 831–847.
Dyke, S. K., Spencer, B. F., Jr., Quast, P., Kaspari, D. C., Jr., and Sain, M. K. (1996). “Implementation of an active mass driver using acceleration feedback control.” Microcomput. Civ. Eng., 11, 305–323.
Dyke, S. K., Spencer, B. F., Jr., Quast, P., and Sain, M. K. (1995). “Role of control-structure interaction in protective system design.” J. Eng. Mech., 121(2), 322–338.
Gahinet, P. (1992). “A convex parametrization of suboptimal controllers.” IEEE Proc., 31st Conf. on Decision and Control, 937–942.
Gahinet, P., and Apkarian, P. (1994). “A linear matrix inequality approach to control.” Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 4, 421–448.
Glover, K., and Doyle, J. C. (1988). “State space formula for all stabilizing controllers that satisfy an -norm bound and relations to risk sensitivity.” Syst. Control Lett., 11, 167–172.
Kobori, T., Inoue, Y., Seto, K., Iemura, H., and Nishitani, A., eds. (1998). Proc., 2nd World Conf. on Structural Control, Wiley, New York.
Moore, B. C. (1981). “Principal component analysis in linear system: Controllability, observability and model reduction.” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 26(1), 17–32.
Scherer, C., Gahinet, P., and Chilali, M. (1997). “Multiobjective output-feedback control via LMI optimization.” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 42(7), 896–911.
Simiu, E., and Scanlan, R. H. (1996). Wind effects on structures, Wiley, New York.
Spencer, B. F., Jr., Dyke, S. J., and Deoskar, H. S. (1998). “Benchmark problems in structural control—Part 1: Active mass driver system, and Part 2: Active tendon system.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 27(11), 1127–1147.
Wu, J. C. (2000). “Modeling of an actively braced full-scale building considering control-structure interaction.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 29(9), 1325–1342.
Wu, J. C., and Pan, B. C. (2002). “Wind tunnel verification of actively controlled high-rise building in along-wind motion.” J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 90(12–15), 1933–1950.
Yang, J. N., Agrawal, A. K., Samali, B., and Wu, J. C. (2004). “Benchmark problem for response control of wind-excited tall buildings.” J. Eng. Mech., 130(4), 437–446.
Young, P., and Bienkiewicz, B. (1998). “Robust controller design for the active mass driver benchmark problem.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 27(11), 1149–1164.
Zhou, K., and Doyle, J. C. (1998). Essentials of robust control, Prentice–Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: May 13, 2003
Accepted: Jun 27, 2005
Published online: Jan 1, 2006
Published in print: Jan 2006
Notes
Note. Associate Editor: Kurtis R. Gurley
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.