Evolving toward Project-Specific Reliability: Are We Sure It's a Good Idea?
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 127, Issue 12
Abstract
The writers of current standards and specifications for load and resistance factor design (LRFD) envisioned that those documents would be used by designers in a manner similar to that used in prior (allowable stress design) formats. They presumed that designs would be accomplished by satisfying a series of checking equations in which the structural resistance exceeds the demand on the structure. While these early developers used reliability analysis tools to derive the load and resistance factors, they did not envision that reliability analysis would evolve into a tool to be directly used by designers. In spite of those early presumptions, the evolving reality is that reliability analysis procedures are now available to an increasing number of individual designers. Sooner or later, these designers will attempt to use reliability analysis to assist them in their project-specific or, more likely, product-specific designs. This paper discusses limitations and potential pitfalls of reliability analysis when used in routine structural design. Specific examples focus on wood design. The conclusion reiterates the premise that LRFD, not theoretical reliability analysis, is the proper tool for use in daily design.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
ASCE. ( 1995). “Standard for load and resistance factor design (LRFD) for engineered wood construction.” AF&PA/ASCE 16-95, New York.
2.
ASCE. ( 1998). “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.” ASCE 7-98, Reston, Va.
3.
ASTM. ( 1993). “Standard specification for computing the reference resistance of wood-based materials and structural connections for load and resistance factor design.” ASTM D5457-93, West Conshohocken, Pa.
4.
ASTM. ( 1998). “Standard practice for evaluating allowable properties for grades of structural lumber.” ASTM D2915-98, West Conshohocken, Pa.
5.
Canadian Standards Association (CSA). ( 1981). “Guidelines for the development of limit states design.” CSA Special Publ. S408-1981, Rexdale, Canada.
6.
Canadian Standards Association (CSA). ( 1994). “Engineering design in wood (limit states design).” CAN/CSA-O86.1-1994, Etobicoke, Canada.
7.
Ellingwood, B., Galambos, T. V., MacGregor, J. G., and Cornell, C. A. ( 1980). “Development of a probability based load criterion for American National Standard A58.” NBS Special Publ. 577, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C.
8.
Ellingwood, B. R. ( 1994). “Probability-based codified design: past accomplishments and future challenges.” Struct. Safety, Amsterdam, 13.
9.
Foschi, R. O., and Li, H. ( 2000). “Inverse reliability applications and performance-based design in timber engineering.” Proc., 2000 World Conf. on Timber Engrg., University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
10.
Gromala, D. S. ( 1995). “Statistics behind load and resistance factor design.” Wood Des. Focus, 6(1).
11.
Gromala, D. S., Douglas, B. K., Rosowsky, D. V., and Sharp, D. J. ( 1999). “Why is reliability analysis so unreliable?” Proc., 1999 Pacific Timber Engrg. Conf., New Zealand Forest Research Institute, Auckland, N.Z.
12.
International Code Council (ICC). ( 2000). International building code, Falls Church, Va.
13.
International Standards Organization (ISO). ( 1998). “General principles on reliability for structures.” ISO/FDIS 2394, Geneva.
14.
Thoft-Christensen, P., and Baker, M. J. ( 1982). Structural reliability theory and its applications, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 127 • Issue 12 • December 2001
Pages: 1485 - 1488
History
Received: Jul 26, 2000
Published online: Dec 1, 2001
Published in print: Dec 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.