TECHNICAL PAPERS
Dec 1, 2001

Equivalent Static Wind Loads for Buffeting Response of Bridges

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 127, Issue 12

Abstract

In current design practice, the dynamic wind loads are described in terms of the equivalent static wind loads based on the gust response factor. This approach results in a distribution of the equivalent static loading similar to the mean static wind load distribution, which may not always be a physically meaningful and realistic load description. In this paper, the equivalent static load representation for multimode buffeting response of bridges is formulated in terms of either a weighted combination of modal inertial load components, or the background and resonant load components. The focus of the present study is on the determination of weighting factors of equivalent static load components in which the correlation among modal response components due to structural and aerodynamic coupling effects is taken into consideration. It is noteworthy that the equivalent static load distributions vary for each response component. The proposed approach particularly helps in extracting design loads from full aeroelastic model test results by expressing the dynamic loads in terms of the equivalent static loads. This facilitates in drawing useful design input from full aeroelastic tests, which have been employed mostly for monitoring the response of bridge models at selected locations. A simplified formulation is also presented in a closed form when wind loading information is available and coupling in modal response components is negligible, which can be very attractive for the preliminary design application. Examples are presented to illustrate modeling of the equivalent static loading and to demonstrate its effectiveness in bridge design.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Chen, X., and Kareem, A. ( 2000). “On the application of stochastic decomposition in the analysis of wind effects.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Advances in Struct. Dyn., Hong Kong, 135–142.
2.
Chen, X., Matsumoto, M., and Kareem, A. (2000a). “Aerodynamic coupling effects on flutter and buffeting of bridges.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 126(1), 17–26.
3.
Chen, X., Matsumoto, M., and Kareem, A. (2000b). “Time domain flutter and buffeting response analysis of bridges.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 126(1), 7–16.
4.
Davenport, A. G. ( 1964). “Note on the distribution of the largest value of a random function with application to gust loading.” J. Inst. of Civ. Engrg., London, 24, 187–196.
5.
Danenport, A. G. (1967). “Gust loading factors.”J. Struct. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 93(1), 11–34.
6.
Davenport, A. G. ( 1985). “The representation of the dynamic effects of turbulent wind by equivalent static wind loads.” Proc., 1985 Int. Engrg. Symp. on Struct. Steel, Chicago, 1–13.
7.
Davenport, A. G., and King, J. P. C. ( 1984). “Dynamic wind forces on long span bridges.” Proc. 12th IABSE Congr., International Association of Bridge and Structural Engineers, Zurich.
8.
Holmes, J. D. ( 1992). “Optimized peak load distributions.” J. Wind Engrg. and Indust. Aerodyn., 41–44, 267–276.
9.
Holmes, J. D. ( 1999). “Equivalent static load distributions for resonant dynamic response of bridges.” Proc., 10th Int. Conf. on Wind Engrg., Copenhagen, 907–911.
10.
Holmes, J. D., and Kasperski. ( 1996). “Effective distributions of fluctuating and dynamic wind loads.” Australian Civ./Struct. Engrg. Trans., 38, 83–88.
11.
Irwin, P. A. ( 1998). “The role of wind tunnel modeling in the prediction of wind effects on bridges.” Bridge aerodynamics, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 59–85.
12.
Kasperski, M. ( 1992). “Extreme wind load distributions for linear and nonlinear design.” Engrg. Struct., 14, 27–34.
13.
Kasperski, M., and Niemann, H.-J. ( 1992). “The LRC (load-response-correlation) method: a general method of estimating unfavorable wind load distributions for linear and nonlinear structural behavior.” J. Wind Engrg. and Indust. Aerodyn., 43, 1753–1763.
14.
Katsuchi, H., Jones, N. P., and Scanlan, R. H. (1999). “Multimode coupled flutter and buffeting analysis of the Akashi-Kaikyo Bridge.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 125(1), 60–70.
15.
King, J. P. C. ( 1999). “Integrating wind tunnel tests of full aeroelastic models into the design of long span bridges.” Proc., 10th Int. Conf. on Wind Engrg., Copenhagen, 927–934.
16.
Scanlan, R. H. ( 1978a). “The action of flexible bridges under wind. I: Flutter theory.” J. Sound and Vibration, 60(2), 187–199.
17.
Scanlan, R. H. ( 1978b). “The action of flexible bridges under wind. II: Buffeting theory.” J. Sound and Vibration, 60(2), 201–211.
18.
Scanlan, R. H. (1993). “Problematic in formulation of wind-force models for bridge decks.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 119(7), 1353–1375.
19.
Zhou, Y., Kareem, A., and Gu, M. (2000). “Equivalent static buffeting loads on structures.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 126(8), 989–992.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 127Issue 12December 2001
Pages: 1467 - 1475

History

Received: Aug 24, 2000
Published online: Dec 1, 2001
Published in print: Dec 2001

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoct. Res. Assoc., Dept. of Civ. Engrg. and Geological Sci., Univ. of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556.
Robert M. Moran Prof. and Chair, Dept. of Civ. Engrg. and Geological Sci., Univ. of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share