Effective Force Testing: A Method of Seismic Simulation for Structural Testing
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 125, Issue 9
Abstract
This paper presents a test method for real-time earthquake simulation studies of large scale test structures. The method, effective force testing (EFT), is based on a force control algorithm. For systems that can be modeled as a series of lumped masses (e.g., frame structures where masses are assumed lumped at the floor levels), the EFT forces are known a priori for any acceleration record. As opposed to the pseudodynamic test method (a displacement-based control procedure), there is no computational time required for the EFT method in determining the required force signal; it is known prior to the test once the structural mass and ground acceleration record to be simulated are determined. Research has been conducted on a single-degree-of-freedom system at the University of Minnesota to investigate the potential of the EFT method. A direct application of the method was found ineffective because the actuator was unable to apply force at the natural frequency of the structure owing to actuator/control/structure interaction. However, numerical simulations and experimental implementation indicated that an additional velocity feedback loop incorporated into the control system can overcome this problem while maintaining the ability to do real-time testing.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Chopra, A. K. (1995). Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 20–22.
2.
Clark, A. J. (1983). “Sinusoidal and random motion analysis of mass loaded actuators and valves.” Proc., Nat. Conf. on Fluid Power.
3.
Clark, A., French, C. W., and Leon, R. T. ( 1989). “Earthquake testing methods for structures: Examples of current practice and future directions.” Earthquake research construction and design, S. A. Savidis, ed., A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 409–418.
4.
Clough, R. W., and Penzien, J. (1975). Dynamics of structures. McGraw-Hill, New York, 546.
5.
Dyke, S. J., Spencer, B. F., Quast, P., and Sain, M. K. (1995). “Role of control-structure interaction in protective system design.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 121(2), 322–338.
6.
Mahin, S. A., and Shing, P. B. (1985). “Pseudodynamic method for seismic testing.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 111(7), 1482–1503.
7.
Mahin, S. A., Shing, P. B., Thewalt, C. R., and Hanson, R. D. (1989). “Pseudodynamic test method—Current status and future directions.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 115(8), 2113–2128.
8.
Merritt, H. E. (1967). Hydraulic control systems. Wiley, New York.
9.
Moehle, J. P., ed. (1996). Earthquake spectra—Theme issue: Experimental methods. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, El Cerrito, Calif.
10.
Murcek, J. A. ( 1996). “Evaluation of the effective force testing method using a SDOF model,” MS thesis, University of Minnesota.
11.
Nakashima, M., Kato, H., and Takaoka, E. (1992). “Development of real-time pseudo dynamic testing.” Earthquake Engrg. and Struct. Dynamics, 21, 79–92.
12.
Thewalt, C. R., and Mahin, S. A. (1987). “Hybrid solution techniques for generalized pseudodynamic testing.” Rep. UBC/EERC-87/09, EERC, University of California, Berkeley.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: Sep 19, 1996
Published online: Sep 1, 1999
Published in print: Sep 1999
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.