Seismic Behavior of Structures with Flexible Diaphragms
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 122, Issue 4
Abstract
The influence of floor flexibility on the seismic response of building structures is discussed through comparison of the computed seismic response for structures with flexible diaphragms and counterpart structures with rigid diaphragms. Case studies of three existing buildings with flexible diaphragms and analogous systems with rigid diaphragms are presented to illustrate these differences. Each building was subjected to the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake. The structures were: (1) A two-story firehouse in Gilroy with unreinforced masonry walls; (2) a two-story timber office building in Palo Alto with grouted and reinforced clay-unit masonry shear walls; and (3) an eight-story hotel in Oakland with unreinforced clay-unit masonry and reinforced-concrete shear walls. The analytical studies show that, in some cases, diaphragm and shear-wall accelerations can increase with the flexibility of the diaphragm. Torsional forces can reduce considerably as diaphragm flexibility increases. Further, approximate expressions prescribed in current seismic codes can underestimate the period of vibration of systems with flexible diaphragms.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
ABAQUS user's manual, version 4.8. (1989). Hibbit, Karlsson & Sorensen Inc., Pawtucket, R.I.
2.
APA design/construction guide: diaphragms. (1983). American Plywood Association, Tacoma, Wash.
3.
Damy-Ríos, J. E., and Alcocer, S. M. (1987). “Obtención del Centro de Torsión de Edificios.”Proc., VI Congreso Nacional de Ingeniería Estructural, C-60–C-67.
4.
“Evaluation of unreinforced masonry bearing wall buildings.” (1992). NEHRP handbook for the seismic evaluation of existing buildings; FEMA 178, Federal Emergency Mgmt. Agency (FEMA), Washington, D.C.
5.
Loma Prieta Earthquake reconnaissance report. (1990). Earthquake Spectra, Supplement to Vol. 6.
6.
“Methodology for mitigation of seismic hazards in existing unreinforced masonry buildings: the methodology.” (1984). ABK Tech. Rep., 08, El Segundo, Calif.
7.
“NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings. Part 1: provisions.” (1994a). Federal Emergency Mgmt. Agency, Rep. No. 222A, Build. Seismic Safety Council, Washington, D.C.
8.
“NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings. Part 2: Commentary.” (1994b). Federal Emergency Mgmt. Agency, Rep. No. 223A, Build. Seismic Safety Council, Washington, D.C.
9.
“Seismic strengthening provisions for unreinforced masonry bearing wall buildings.” (1994). UCBC Appendix C, International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, Calif.
10.
Shakal et al. (1989). “CSMIP strong-motion records from the Santa Cruz Mountains (Loma Prieta), California Earthquake of 17 October 1989.”Rep. OSMS 89-06, Calif. Strong Motion Instrumentation Program, Sacramento, Calif.
11.
Tena-Colunga, A.(1992). “Seismic evaluation of unreinforced masonry structures with flexible diaphragms.”Earthquake Spectra, 8(2), 305–318.
12.
Tena-Colunga, A., and Abrams, D. P. (1992a). “Response of an unreinforced masonry building during the Loma Prieta Earthquake.”Proc., IOWCEE, Vol. 1, A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 79–84.
13.
Tena-Colunga, A., and Abrams, D. P. (1992b). “Response of an unreinforced masonry building during the Loma Prieta Earthquake.”Struct. Res. Ser. No. 576, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Ill.
14.
Tena-Colunga, A., and Abrams, D. P. (1992c). “Response of an instrumented masonry shear wall building with flexible diaphragms during the Loma Prieta Earthquake.”Struct. Res. Ser. No. 577, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Ill.
15.
“Tentative provisions for the development of seismic regulations of buildings.” (1978). ATC Publ. ATC 3-06, NBS Spec. Publ. 510, Appl. Technol. Council (ATC), Redwood City, Calif.
16.
“The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989; observations regarding the performance of masonry buildings.” (1990). Rep., Int. Masonry Inst., Washington, D.C.
17.
Uniform building code. (1994). International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, Calif.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 122 • Issue 4 • April 1996
Pages: 439 - 445
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Apr 1, 1996
Published in print: Apr 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.