Improved Frame Stability Analysis with Effective Lengths
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 122, Issue 11
Abstract
Approximate methods for determination of effective lengths of compression members in frame systems are normally based on rotational restraints defined through so-called joint stiffness ratios or G -factors. These approaches allow the member to be considered in isolation from the rest of the frame. However, they are known to be inaccurate in many cases. A method is proposed that involves postprocessing of effective lengths from isolated column analyses to arrive at improved, weighted mean values. The approach, termed the method of means, satisfies general system instability principles, is attractively simple, and yields in general effective length predictions in excellent agreement with exact results for a wide variation of parameters. The errors are normally within a few percent of exact solutions. The method is applicable to braced and to a range of unbraced frames. It is particularly suitable for cases where drastic changes of beam or column stiffness occur, such as in the top or bottom stories of a frame, or where column stiffness, axial force level, and story height change at certain floor levels.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bjorhovde, R.(1984). “Effect of end restraint on column strength: practical applications.”Engrg. J., AISC, 21(1), 1–13.
2.
Bridge, R. Q., and Fraser, D. J. (1986). “Improved G -factor method for evaluating effective lengths of columns.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 113(6), 1341–1356.
3.
Duan, L., and Chen, W. F.(1988). “Effective length factors for columns in braced frames.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 114(10), 2357–2370.
4.
Duan, L., and Chen, W. F.(1989). “Effective length factor for columns in unbraced frames.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 115(1), 149–165.
5.
Frislid, A. (1994). “Evaluation of simplified methods for stability analysis of frame structures,” Cand.scient. thesis, Mech. Div., Dept. of Math., Univ. of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (in Norwegian).
6.
Galambos, T. V. (1968). Structural members and frames . Prentice-Hall, Inc., New York, N.Y.
7.
Hellesland, J. (1992a). “Effective lengths—an appraisal of various restraint participation factors.”Res. Rep. in Mech., No. 92-4 (May), Mech. Div., Dept. of Math., Univ. of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
8.
Hellesland, J. (1992b). “Effective lengths—simplified system instability analysis.”Res. Rep. in Mech., No. 92-5 (May), Mech. Div., Dept. of Math., Univ. of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
9.
Hellesland, J. (1995). “Simplified system instability analysis.”Proc., 4th Pacific Struct. Steel Conf. (PSSC); Vol. 1, Steel Structures, N. E. Shanmugam and Y. S. Choo, eds., Pergamon Press, Inc., Tarrytown, N.Y., 95–102.
10.
Hellesland, J., and Bjorhovde, R.(1996). “Restraint demand factors and effective lengths of braced columns.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 122(10), 1216–1224.
11.
Kuhn, G. K. (1976). “An appraisal of the effective length alignment charts,” MS thesis, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, Ariz.
12.
LeMessurier, W. J.(1977). “A practical method of second-order analysis. 2: Rigid frames.”Engrg. J., AISC, 14(2), 49–67.
13.
Yura, J. A.(1971). “Effective length of columns in unbraced frames.”Engrg. J., AISC, 8(2), 37–42.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 122 • Issue 11 • November 1996
Pages: 1275 - 1283
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Nov 1, 1996
Published in print: Nov 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.