Restraint Demand Factors and Effective Lengths of Braced Columns
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 122, Issue 10
Abstract
The effective length approach for column stability evaluation has long played an important role in approximate methods of analysis. Methods for determination of effective lengths of compression members in frame systems are examined and discussed in terms of exact results and general principles of mechanics of buckling. Conventional rotational restraint factors in the general case are found to be less than accurate. Such factors include the well known G (or ψ) term, defined as the relative joint stiffness ratio. The vertical interaction between compression members below and above a joint, as implied by the conventional G-term, are shown to be conceptually flawed. The novel concept of a restraint demand factor is introduced, to allow for improved development of vertical interaction in member stability terms, including effective length predictions. Conventional and alternative restraint demand factors are compared to exact solutions for a realistically wide range of frame parameters. Sources of inaccuracies are identified and quantified, and limits of applicability are suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bridge, R. Q., and Fraser, D. J. (1986). “Improved G-factor method for evaluating effective lengths of columns.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 113(6), 1341–1356.
2.
“Building code requirements for reinforced concrete and commentary.” (1989). ACI 318–89, ACI 318R–89, Am. Concrete Inst. (ACI), Detroit, Mich.
3.
Duan, L., and Chen, W. F.(1988). “Effective length factors for columns in braced frames.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 114(10), 2357–2370.
4.
Duan, L., and Chen, W. F.(1989). “Effective length factors for columns in unbraced frames.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 115(1), 149–165.
5.
“Eurocode 2: design of concrete structures—part 1: general rules and rules for buildings.” (1991). European prestandard ENV 1992-1-1, CEN, Brussels, Belgium.
6.
“Eurocode 3: design of steel structures—part 1.1: general rules and rules for buildings.” (1992). European prestandard ENV 1993-1-1, CEN, Brussels, Belgium.
7.
Galambos, T. V. (1968). Structural members and frames. Prentice-Hall, Inc., New York, N.Y.
8.
Goncalves, R.(1992). “New stability equation for columns in braced frames.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 118(7), 1853–1870.
9.
Hellesland, J. (1992a). “Effective lengths—an appraisal of various restraint participation factors.”Res. Rep. in Mech., No. 92-4, Mech. Div., Dept. of Math., Univ. of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
10.
Hellesland, J. (1992b). “Effective lengths—Simplified system instability analysis.”Res. Rep. in Mech., No. 92-5, Mech. Div., Dept. of Math., Univ. of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
11.
Hellesland, J., and Bjorhovde, R. (1996). “Improved frame stability analysis with effective lengths.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 122(11).
12.
Johnston, B. G., ed. (1976). Guide to stability design criteria for metal structures, 3rd Ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York, N.Y.
13.
Kuhn, G. K. (1976). “An appraisal of the effective length alignment charts,” MS thesis, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, Ariz.
14.
Manual of steel construction—load and resistance factor design, 2nd Ed. (1994). Am. Inst. of Steel Constn., (AISC), Chicago, Ill.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 122 • Issue 10 • October 1996
Pages: 1216 - 1224
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Oct 1, 1996
Published in print: Oct 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.