Shakedown of Frames with Semirigid Connections
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 119, Issue 6
Abstract
The shakedown analysis of elastoplastic plane frames with semirigid connections is considered within a framework of discrete models and piecewise linear yield surfaces. The formulation adopted is based on the classical Bleich‐Melan static theorem, and leads to a linear programming problem. A simple linear elastic perfectly plastic connection element is used to account for the reduced flexibility and partial strength of semirigid beam‐to‐column connections. The necessary conditions of equilibrium and of yield conformity are expressed compactly in matrix form, and the calculation of the elastic locus for the cyclic‐load domain is clarified. A means of identifying whether incremental collapse or alternating plasticity governs failure under repeated loading is also mentioned. Finally, three examples are presented primarily as a preliminary assessment of the shakedown behavior of semirigid frames. In particular, it is shown that the shakedown limit of such structures can be significantly lower than the corresponding plastic collapse limit. The importance of considering axial effects on plasticity and of using the correct elastic stiffness in shakedown calculations are also highlighted.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Al‐Bermani, F. G. A., and Kitipornchai, S. (1992). “Elastoplastic nonlinear analysis of flexibly jointed space frames.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 118(1), 108–127.
2.
Bjorhovde, R., Colson, A., and Brozzetti, J. (1990). “Classification system for beam‐to‐column connections.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 116(11), 3059–3076.
3.
Borkowski, A. (1978). “Method of rigid‐plastic finite elements in analyzing and optimizing frames.” Mechanika i Komputer, Polska Academia Nauk 1, 125–138 (in Polish).
4.
Chen, W. F., ed. (1987). “Joint flexibility and steel frames.” J. Const. Steel Res., 8, London, England.
5.
Chen, W. F., ed. (1988). “Steel beam‐to‐column building connections.” J. Const. Steel Res., 10, London, England.
6.
Chen, W. F., and Lui, E. M. (1991). Stability design of steel frames. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
7.
Colson, A. (1988). “Three‐dimensional physical and mathematical modeling of connections.” Connections in steel structures: Behavior, strength and design, R. Bjorhovde, J. Brozzetti, and A. Colson, eds., Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London, England, 104–111.
8.
Colson, A. (1991). “Theoretical modelling of semirigid connections behavior.” J. Const. Steel Res., 19(3), 213–224.
9.
Connections flexibility and steel frames. (1985). W. F. Chen, ed. New York, N.Y.
10.
Connections in steel structures: Behavior, strength and design. (1988). R. Bjorhovde, J. Brozzetti, and A. Colson, eds., Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London, England.
11.
Gerstle, K. H., and Cook, N. E. (1988). “Simplicity in flexibly‐connected frame analysis.” Connections in steel structures: Behavior, strength and design, R. Bjorhovde, J. Brozzetti, and A. Colson, eds., Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London, England, 300–308.
12.
Gibbons, C., Kirby, P. A., and Nethercot, D. A. (1991). “Experimental behavior of 3‐D column subassemblages with semi‐rigid joints.” J. Const. Steel Res., 19(3), 235–246.
13.
Janss, J., Jaspart, J. P., and Maquoi, R. (1988). “Experimental study of the nonlinear behavior of beam‐to‐column bolted joints.” Connections in steel structures: Behavior, strength and design, R. Bjorhovde, J. Brozzetti, and A. Colson, eds., Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London, England, 26–32.
14.
Jones, S. W., Kirby, P. A., and Nethercot, D. A. (1983). “The analysis of frames with semi‐rigid connections—a state‐of‐the‐art report.” J. Const. Steel Res., 3(2), 2–13.
15.
König, J. A. (1987). Shakedown of elastic‐plastic structures. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, Asmterdam, The Netherlands.
16.
König, J. A., and Maier, G. (1981). “Shakedown analysis of structures: a review of recent developments.” Nucl. Engrg. Des., 66(1), 81–95.
17.
Maier, G. (1969). “Shakedown theory in perfect elastoplasticity with associated and nonassociated flow‐laws: A finite element, linear programming approach.” Meccanica, 4(3), 250–260.
18.
Maier, G. (1973). “A shakedown matrix theory allowing for workhardening and second‐order effects.” Proc., Int. Symp. Foundations of Plasticity, A. Sawczuk, ed., Noordhoff, Leyden, The Netherlands, 417–433.
19.
Maier, G. (1977). “Shakedown analysis.” Engineering plasticity and mathematical programming, NATO‐ASI, Pergamon Press, New York, N.Y.
20.
Maier, G., and Munro, J. (1982). “Mathematical programming applications to engineering plastic analysis.” Appl. Mech. Review, 35(12), 1631–1643.
21.
Maier, G., and Lloyd Smith, D. (1986). “Update to mathematical programming applications to engineering plastic analysis:” Appl. Mech. Update, C. R. Steele and G. S. Springer, eds., ASME, New York, N.Y., 377–383.
22.
Maquoi, R. (1991). “Semi‐rigid joints: from research to design practice.” Steel structures: Recent research and developments, S. L. Lee and N. E. Shanmugan, eds., Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London, England, 32–43.
23.
Mazzolani, F. M. (1988). “Influence of semi‐rigid connections on the overall stability of steel frames.” Connections in steel structures: Behavior, strength and design, R. Bjorhovde, J. Brozzetti, and A. Colson, eds., Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London, England, 272–279.
24.
Mohamed, S. E., Kounadis, A. N., and Simitses, G. J. (1991). “Elastic‐plastic instability of flexibly connected non‐orthogonal frames.” Comput. Struct., 39(6), 663–669.
25.
Moncarz, P. D., and Gerstle, K. H. (1981). “Steel frames with nonlinear connections.” J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 107(8), 1427–1441.
26.
Poggi, C. (1988). “A finite element model for the analysis of flexibly connected steel frames.” Int. J. Num. Meth. Engrg., 26(10), 2239–2254.
27.
Poggi, C., and Zandonini, R. (1985). “Behavior and strength of steel frames with semi‐rigid connections.” Connections flexibility and steel frames, W. F. Chen, ed., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 57–76.
28.
Poggi, C., and Zandonini, R. (1988). “A finite element for the analysis of semi‐rigid frames.” Connections in steel structures: Behavior, strength and design, R. Bjorhovde, J. Brozzetti, and A. Colson, eds., Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London, England, 238–247.
29.
Popov, E. P. (1985). “Flexibility of steel seismic moment connections.” Connections flexibility and steel frames, W. F. Chen, ed., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 101–119.
30.
Popov, E. P. (1988). “Seismic moment connections for MRFs.” J. Const. Steel Res., 10, London, England, 163–198.
31.
Romstad, K. M., and Subramanian, C. V. (1970). “Analysis of frames with partial connection rigidity.” J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 96(11), 2283–2301.
32.
Saran, M., and Borkowski, A. (1978). “Computer‐aided limit analysis of frames.” Archimum Inzynierii Ladowej, 24(4), 645–657 (in Polish).
33.
Stelmack, T. W., Marley, M. J., and Gerstle, K. H. (1986). “Analysis and tests of flexibly connected steel frames.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 112(7), 1573–1588.
34.
Tin‐Loi, F., and Grundy, P. (1978). “Deflection stability of work hardening structures.” J. Struct. Mech., 6(3), 331–347.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 119 • Issue 6 • June 1993
Pages: 1694 - 1711
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 16, 1992
Published online: Jun 1, 1993
Published in print: Jun 1993
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.