Seismic Durability of Retrofitted Reinforced‐Concrete Columns
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 119, Issue 5
Abstract
The seismic performances of four (three retrofitted and one control) half‐scale, circular, reinforced‐concrete columns were studied. The columns were 10‐ft high, 18‐in. diameter cantilevers. The longitudinal flexural steel was spliced to the foundation dowels just above the fixed base. A concentric axial load of 0.20 was continually applied during testing. The free ends of the cantilevers were translated to produce a maximum displacement of four times that necessary to produce yield in the longitudinal reinforcing steel. This loading was repeated with both positive and negative displacements in a quasistatic manner until the lateral forces required to produce these displacements approached zero. The measure of seismic durability used was the number of such cycles that a column sustained before losing structural integrity. The laboratory arrangement was intended to model the arrangement of bridge columns constructed in the 1950 to mid‐1970 era. Three columns were retrofitted with prestressed, externally located circular hoops at intervals along the lower 4 ft. The spacing and size of these ties varied from column to column. The control column sustained less than two cycles before losing structural integrity; the retrofitted columns sustained a minimum of 12 cycles.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Coffman, H. L. (1990). “Retrofitting of reinforced concrete bridge columns,” MS thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash.
2.
Park, R. (1986). “Ductile design approach for reinforced concrete frames.” Earthquake Spectra, 2(3), 565–619.
3.
Paulay, T., Zanza, T. M., and Scarpas, A. (1981). “Lapped splices in bridge piers and in columns of earthquake resisting reinforced concrete frames.” Research rep. 81‐6, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
4.
Priestley, M. J. N., and Park, R. (1984). “Strength and ductility of bridge substructures.” Research rep. 84‐20, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
5.
Priestley, M. J. N., Seible, F., and Chai, Y. H. (1989). Seismic retrofitting of bridge columns. Dept. of Appl. Mech. and Engrg. Sci., University of California, San Diego, Calif.
6.
“Seismic durability of retrofitted r.c. columns.” (1991). Rep. no. WA‐RD 228.1, Washington State Transp. Ctr. (TRAC), Washington State Dept. of Transp., Transportation Building, Olympia, Wash.
7.
Standard specifications for highway bridges, (1961). 8th Ed., Am. Assoc. of State Hwy. Officials (AASHTO), Washington, D.C.
8.
Standard specifications for road, bridge and municipal construction; M 41‐10. (1964). Washington State Dept. of Transp., Olympia, Wash.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 21, 1992
Published online: May 1, 1993
Published in print: May 1993
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.