Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of 3‐D‐Base‐Isolated Structures
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 117, Issue 7
Abstract
In base‐isolated structures specially designed isolation systems provide the needed flexibility and energy dissipation capacity. The isolation systems, which can be either elastomeric or sliding systems, exhibit highly nonlinear behavior. The existing algorithms cannot analyze base‐isolated structures with sliding isolation systems accurately. This paper presents an analytical model and a solution algorithm developed for nonlinear dynamic analysis of three‐dimensional‐base‐isolated structures with elastomeric and/or sliding isolation systems. The novelty of the analytical model and solution algorithm is its capability to capture the highly nonlinear frictional behavior of sliding isolation systems in plane motion. Nonlinear behavior is restricted to the base and the superstructure is considered to be elastic at all times. Biaxial and uniaxial models, which can represent both elastomeric and sliding isolation bearings, are presented. The solution algorithm consisting of the pseudoforce method with iteration is presented. Comparison of computed results with experimental results is presented for verification. A six‐story‐reinforced‐concrete‐base‐isolated structure is analyzed.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Buckle, I. G., and Mayes, R. L. (1990). “Seismic isolation: history, application, and performance—A world overview.” Earthquake Spectra, 6(2), 161–202.
2.
Built, S. M. (1982). “Lead‐rubber dissipators for the base isolation of bridge structures.” Report No. 289, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
3.
Constantinou, M. C., Mokha, A., and Reinhorn, A. M. (1990). “Teflon bearings in base isolation II: Modeling.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 116(2), 455–474.
4.
Gear, C. W. (1971). “The automatic integration of ordinary differential equations.” Numerical Mathematics, Communications of ACM, 14(3), 176–190.
5.
Kannan, A. M., and Powell, G. H. (1975). “DRAIN‐2D: a general purpose computer program for dynamic analysis of inelastic plane structures with users guide.” Report No. UCB/EERC‐73/22, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr., Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
6.
Kelly, J. M. (1986). “Aseismic base isolation: review and bibliography.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Engrg., 5(4), 202–217.
7.
Mokha, A., Constantinou, M. C., and Reinhorn, A. M. (1990a). “Experimental study and analytical prediction of earthquake response of a sliding isolation system with a spherical surface.” Report No. NCEER‐90‐0020, Nat. Ctr. for Earthquake Engrg. Res., State Univ. of New York, Buffalo, N.Y.
8.
Mokha, A., Constantinou, M. C., and Reinhorn, A. M. (1990b). “Teflon bearings in base isolation I: Testing.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 116(2), 438–454.
9.
Mondkar, D. P., and Powell, G. H. (1975). “ANSR—general purpose program for analysis of nonlinear structural response.” Report No. UCB/EERC‐75/37, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr., Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
10.
Mostaghel, N., and Khodaverdian, M. (1988). “Seismic response of structures supported on R‐FBI system.” Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dyn., 16(4), 839–854.
11.
Nagarajaiah, S. (1990). “Nonlinear dynamic analysis of three dimensional base isolated structures,” thesis presented to the State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
12.
Nagarajaiah, S., Reinhorn, A. M., and Constantinou, M. C. (1990). “Analytical modeling of three dimensional behavior of base isolation devices.” Proc. Fourth U.S. Nat. Conf. on Earthquake Engrg., Earthquake Engrg. Res. Inst., 3, 579–588.
13.
Nagarajaiah, S., Reinhorn, A. M., and Constantinou, M. C. (1991). “Nonlinear dynamic analysis of three dimensional base isolated structures (3D‐BASIS).” Report No. NCEER‐91‐0005, Nat. Ctr. for Earthquake Engrg. Res., State Univ. of New York, Buffalo, N.Y.
14.
Park, Y. J., Wen, Y. K., and Ang, A. H. S. (1986). “Random vibration of hysteretic systems under bidirectional ground motions.” Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dyn., 14(4), 543–557.
15.
Rosenbrock, H. H. (1964). “Some general implicit processes for the numerical solution of differential equations.” Comput. J., 18(1), 50–64.
16.
Seismic base isolation using lead‐rubber bearings. (1983). Dynamic Isolation Systems, Inc., Berkeley, Calif.
17.
Su, L., Ahmadi, G., and Tadjbakhsh, I. G. (1989). “A comparative study of performance of various base isolation systems, Part I: Shear beam structures.” Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dyn., 18(1), 11–32.
18.
“Tentative general requirements for the design and construction of seismic‐isolated structures.” (1990). Recommended lateral force requirements and commentary, Struct. Engrg. Association of California, Calif., 177C‐203C.
19.
Way, D., and Jeng, V. (1988). “NPAD—a computer program for the analysis of base isolated structures.” Proc. ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conf., American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 147, 65–69.
20.
Wilson, E. L., Hollings, J. P., and Dovey, H. H. (1975). “ETABS—Three dimensional analysis of building systems.” Report No. UCB/EERC‐75/13, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr., Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
21.
Yasaka, A., Mizukoshi, K., Izuka, M., Takenaka, Y., Maeda, S., and Fujimoto, N. (1988). “Biaxial hysteresis model for base isolation devices.” Summaries of technical papers of annual meeting, Architectural Inst. of Japan, Tokyo, Japan, 1, 395–400.
22.
Younis, C., Tadjbakhsh, I. G., and Saibel, E. A. (1983). “Analysis of general plane motion with coulomb friction.” Wear, 91(3), 319–331.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1991
Published in print: Jul 1991
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.