Shear Flow Zone in Torsion of Reinforced Concrete
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 116, Issue 11
Abstract
Rausch's classical formula overestimates the torsional strength of reinforced concrete members to an unacceptable degree. The error is traced to the incorrect determination of the centerline of the circulating shear flow. The position of the centerline of shear flow is directly related to the thickness of the shear flow zone The determination of in torsion is analogous to the determination of the depth of the compression zone in bending. This paper presents a simple theoretical method to calculate based on the softened truss model theory. The method utilizes the equilibrium and compatibility conditions, as well as a softened stress‐strain relationship for concrete struts. Since is calculated by a rigorous procedure, an accurate torsional strength can be predicted. The prediction of the torsional strengths of 61 beams found in the literature compares extremely well with the test values. In addition, a very simple formula for is also proposed for the practical design of members subjected to torsion.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
“Bemessung im Stahlbetonbau” (Design of Reinforced Concrete), (1958). German Standard DIN 4334. Wilhelm Ernst and Sohn, Berlin, West Germany (in German).
2.
Bradburn, J. H. (1968). “An investigation of combined bending and torsion in rectangular reinforced concrete members,” thesis presented to North Carolina State University at Raleigh, N.C., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
3.
Bredt, R. (1896). “Kritische Bemerkunger zur Drehungselastizitat.” Zeitschrift des Vereines Deutscher Ingenieure, Band 40(28), 785–790;;
(29), 813–817 (in German).
4.
“Building code requirements for reinforced concrete (ACI 318‐83).” (1971). American Concrete Institute, ACI Committee 318, Detroit, Mich.
5.
Collins, M. (1973). “Torque‐twist characteristics of reinforced concrete beams.” Inelasticity and non‐linearity in structural concrete. University of Waterloo Press, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
6.
Collins, M. P., and Mitchell, D. (1980). “Shear and torsion design of prestressed and non‐prestressed concrete beams,” J. Prestressed Concr. Inst., 25(5), 32–100.
7.
“Design of concrete structures and buildings.” (1984). CAN3‐A23.3‐M84, Canadian Standard Association, Rexdale, Ontario, Canada.
8.
Elgren, L. (1972). “Reinforced concrete beams loaded in combined torsion, bending and shear.” Publication 71:3, Division of Concrete Structures, Chalmers Univ. of Technology, Goteborg, Sweden.
9.
Hsu, T. T. C. (1968a). “Torsion of structural concrete—Behavior of reinforced concrete rectangular members.” Torsion of Structural Concrete, SP‐18. American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Mich.
10.
Hsu, T. T. C. (1968b). “Ultimate torque of reinforced rectangular beams,” J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 94(2), 485–510.
11.
Hsu, T. T. C., and Mo, Y. L. (1983). “Softening of concrete in torsional members.” Research Report No. ST‐TH‐001‐83, Dept. Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Houston, Tex.
12.
Hsu, T. T. C. (1984). Torsion of reinforced concrete. Van Nostrand Reinhold, Inc., New York, N.Y.
13.
Hsu, T. T. C., and Mo, Y. L. (1985a). “Softening of concrete in torsional members—Theory and tests.” J. Am. Concr. Inst., Proc, 82(3), 290–303.
14.
Hsu, T. T. C., and Mo, Y. T. (1985b). “Softening of concrete in torsional members—Design recommendations.” J. Am. Concr. Inst., Proc, 82(4), 443–452.
15.
Hsu, T. T. C. (1988). “Softened truss model theory for shear and torsion.” Struct. J. Am. Concr. Inst., 85(6), 624–635.
16.
Lampert, P., and Thurlimann, B. (1968). “Torsionsversuche an Stahlbetonbalken” (Torsion tests of reinforced concrete beams). Bericht Nr. 6506‐2, Institute fur Baustatik, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland (in German).
17.
Lampert, P., and Thurlimann, B. (1969). “Torsion‐Beige‐Versuche an Stahlbetonbalken” (Torsion‐bending tests on reinforced concrete beams). Bericht Nr. 6506‐3, Institut fur Baustatik, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland (in German).
18.
Leonhardt, F., and Schelling, G. (1974). “Torsionversuche an Stahlbetonbalken,” Heft 289, Deutscher Ausschuss fur Stahlbeton, Berlin, West Germany (in German).
19.
McMullen, A. E., and Warwaruk, J. (1967). “The torsional strength of rectangular reinforced concrete beams subjected to combined loading.” Report No. 2, Dept. Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
20.
McMullen, A. E., and Rangan, B. V. (1978). “Pure torsion in rectangular sections—A re‐examination.” J. Am. Concr. Inst., Proc., 75(10), 511–519.
21.
Mitchell, D., and Collins, M. P. (1974). “The behavior of structural concrete beams in pure torsion.” Publication 74‐06, Dept. Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
22.
“Model code for concrete structures.” (1978). CEB‐FIP international recommendations, 3rd Ed., Comite Euro‐International du Beton.
23.
Rausch, E. (1929). “Design of reinforced concrete in torsion” (Berechnung des Ei‐senbetons gegen Verdrehung), Technische Hochschule, Berlin, Germany.
24.
Robinson, J. R., and Demorieux, J. M. (1972). “Essais de traction—Compression sur modèles d'ame de poutre en Beton Armé) IRABA Report, Institute de Re‐cherches Applliquees du Beton Armé, Part 1, June 1968. Part 2, “Resistance ultimate due Beton de l'ame de poutres en double te en Beton Ar,” May (in French).
25.
Vecchio, F., and Collins, M. P. (1981). “Stress‐strain characteristics of reinforced concrete in pure shear.” Final report, IABSE Colloquium Advanced Mechanics of Reinforced Concrete, International Association of Bridge and Structural Engineers.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 ASCE.
History
Published online: Nov 1, 1990
Published in print: Nov 1990
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.