TECHNICAL PAPERS
Dec 1, 2006

Evaluating Bioretention Hydrology and Nutrient Removal at Three Field Sites in North Carolina

Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 132, Issue 6

Abstract

Three bioretention field sites in North Carolina were examined for pollutant removal abilities and hydrologic performance. The cells varied by fill media type or drainage configuration. The field studies confirmed high annual total nitrogen mass removal rates at two conventionally drained bioretention cells (40% reduction each). Nitrate-nitrogen mass removal rates varied between 75 and 13%, and calculated annual mass removal of zinc, copper, and lead from one Greensboro cell were 98, 99, and 81%, respectively. All high mass removal rates were due to a substantial decrease in outflow volume. The ratio of volume of water leaving the bioretention cell versus that which entered the cell varied from 0.07 (summer) to 0.54 (winter). There was a significant (p<0.05) change in the ratio of outflow volume to inflow volume when comparing warm seasons to winter. Cells using a fill soil media with a lower phosphorus index (P-index), Chapel Hill cell C1 and Greensboro cell G1, had much higher phosphorus removal than Greensboro cell G2, which used a high P-index fill media. Fill media selection is critical for total phosphorus removal, as fill media with a low P-index and relatively high CEC appear to remove phosphorus much more readily.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers would like to thank the research sponsor: the North Carolina Water Quality Workgroup of the UNC Water Resources Research Institute. The City of Greensboro (Scott Bryant and Ron Small) and the Town of Chapel Hill (Fred Royall) provided invaluable support. Thanks also go to the following members of the NCSU Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department: L. T. Woodlief, Amy Moran, Mike Shaffer, and Dave Bidelspach.

References

American Sigma. (2003). User’s manual for Sigma 900 and Sigma 900Max, Mission Viejo, Calif.
Amoozegar, A., and Wilson, A. W. (1999). “Methods for measuring hydraulic conductivity and drainable porosity.” Agricultural drainage, R. W. Skaggs, ed., ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, Wis., 1149–1205.
Barth, C. A. (2000). “Nutrient movement from the lawn to the stream.” The practice of watershed protection, T. R. Schueler and H. K. Holland, eds., Center for Watershed Protection, Ellicott City, Md., 29–36.
“Chesapeake Bay cleanup coming along.” (2001). News and Observer (Raleigh, N.C.), July 22, 5A.
Coffman, L., Green, R., Clar, M., and Bitter, S. (1993a). “Design considerations associated with bioretention practices.” Water management in the 90’s: A time for innovation, K. Hon, ed., ASCE, Reston, Va., 130–133.
Coffman, L., Green, R., Clar, M., and Bitter, S. (1993b). “Development of bioretention practices for stormwater management.” Water management in the 90’s: A time for innovation, K. Hon, ed., ASCE, Reston, Va., 126–129.
Davis, A. P., Shokouhian, M., Sharma, H., and Minami, C. (2001). “Laboratory study of biological retention for urban stormwater management.” Water Environ. Res., 73(1), 5–14.
Davis, A. P., Shokouhian, M., Sharma, H., Minami, C., and Winogradoff, D. (2003). “Water quality improvement through bioretention: Lead, copper, and zinc removal.” Water Environ. Res., 75(1), 73–82.
Dietz, M. E., and Clausen, J. C. (2005). “A field evaluation of rain garden flow and pollutant treatment.” Water, Air, Soil Pollut., 167(1–4), 123–138.
Dunn, J. (1977). Soil survey of Orange County, North Carolina, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C.
Emerson, C., and Traver, R. G. (2004). “The Villanova bio-infiltration traffic island: Project overview.” Proc., 2004 World Water and Environmental Resources Congress: Critical Transitions in Water and Environmental Resources Management, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 403–407.
Gray, J. (2000). “What are we trying to protect?” Stormwater, 1(1), 46–49.
Hager, M. C. (2003). “Low-impact development: Lot-level approaches to stormwater management are gaining ground.” Stormwater, 4(1), 12–25.
Hardy, D. H., Tucker, M. R., and Stokes, C. E. (2003). “Crop fertilization based on North Carolina soil tests.” Circular No. 1, North Carolina Dept. of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Agronomic Division, Raleigh, N.C.
Hsieh, C.-H., and Davis, A. P. (2005). “Multiple-event study of bioretention for treatment of urban stormwater runoff.” Water Sci. Technol., 51(3–4), 177–181.
Hunt, W. F. (2003). “Pollutant removal evaluation and hydraulic characterization for bioretention stormwater treatment devices.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., State College, Pa.
Kadlec, R. H., and Knight, R. L. (1996). Treatment wetlands, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
Kim, H., Seagren, E. A., and Davis, A. P. (2003). “Engineered bioretention for removal of nitrate from stormwater runoff.” Water Environ. Res., 75(4), 355–367.
National Weather Service. (2005). Climate data, http://www.weather.gov/climate/index.php?wfo=rah (Dec. 15, 2005).
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR). (1997). Stormwater best management practice design manual, Division of Water Quality, Raleigh, N.C.
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR). (1999). Tar-Pamlico river basin: Proposed text of rules. Division of Water Quality, Raleigh, N.C.
North Carolina State Climate Office (NCSCO). (2005). “Climate normals.” http://www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu (Dec. 15, 2005).
Pitt, R., Field, R., Lalor, M., and Brown, M. (1995). “Urban stormwater toxic pollutants: Assessment, sources, and reliability.” Water Environ. Res., 67(3), 260–275.
Stephens, R. B. (1977). Soil survey of Guilford County, North Carolina, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2000). “Storm water Phase II final rule: Small MS4 storm water program overview. Fact sheet 2.0.” Doc. No. 833-F-00-002, Washington, D.C.
Wossink, G. A., and Hunt, W. F. (2003). “Cost effectiveness analysis of structural stormwater best management practices in North Carolina.” Rep. No. 344, North Carolina Water Resources Research Institute, Raleigh, N.C.
Wu, J. S., Allan, C. J., Saunders, W. L., and Evett, J. B. (1998). “Characterization and pollutant loading estimation for highway runoff.” J. Environ. Eng., 124(7), 584–592.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 132Issue 6December 2006
Pages: 600 - 608

History

Received: Jul 20, 2005
Accepted: Oct 27, 2005
Published online: Dec 1, 2006
Published in print: Dec 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

W. F. Hunt
Assistant Professor and Extension Specialist, Dept. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7625. E-mail: [email protected]
A. R. Jarrett
Professor, Dept. of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802. E-mail: [email protected]
J. T. Smith
Project Engineer, McKim and Creed, Raleigh, NC 27607.
L. J. Sharkey
Engineer, CH2M Hill, Raleigh, NC 27606.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share