Reduced-Runoff Irrigation of Sudan Grass Hay, Imperial Valley, California
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 127, Issue 5
Abstract
Sudan grass is a moderately salt-tolerant annual that is capable of substantial osmotic adjustment under high soil salinity conditions, but little is documented about its actual water use and yield under saline conditions. We estimate water use and evaluate the effects of “reduced-runoff” irrigation on soil salinity associated with Sudan grass hay production during a three-year field study (1996–98) in the Imperial Valley, California. The reduced-runoff irrigation method relies on the application of a simplified volume-balance surface irrigation model, and can result in negligible surface runoff; however, its use may have adverse impacts on soil salinity. Despite an anticipated salinity-induced yield reduction of about 15% associated with an average soil salinity of 6 dS/m (0–0.6 m depth), use of the reduced-runoff method resulted in satisfactory crop yields, practically no tailwater runoff, and a slight decrease from the initial average profile soil salinity. The average applied water depth and estimated consumptive use (ETc) during the project were 1,019 and 935 mm, respectively, resulting in an average hay yield of 14.4 Mg/ha versus the 1996–98 county average of 12.6 Mg/ha. The project average ETc/ET0 and yield/ETc ratios of 0.73 and 15.5 kg/ha⋅mm, respectively, were approximately 15% less than those estimated from water-use-efficiency studies, probably as a result of salinity-induced hay yield reduction.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M. ( 1998). “Crop evapotranspiration—Guidelines for computing crop water requirements.” FAO Irrig. and Drain. Paper No. 56, United Nations, Rome.
2.
Bali, K. M., and Gonzalez, R. A. ( 1997). “Availability of Colorado River water for transfer in southern California.” Water: Economics, management and demand, M. Kay, T. Franks, and L. Smith, eds., E & FN Spon, London.
3.
Bali, K. M., Grismer, M. E., and Snyder, R. L. ( 2000). “Irrigation and drainage management and surface runoff reduction in the Imperial Valley.” Final Rep. Prepared for California Dept. of Water Resour.
4.
Bali, K. M., Grismer, M. E., and Tod, I. C. (2001). “Reduced-runoff irrigation of alfalfa in Imperial Valley, California.”J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., ASCE, 127(3), 123–130.
5.
Elliot, R. L., and Walker, W. R. ( 1982). “Field evaluation of furrow infiltration and advance functions.” Trans., ASAE, St. Joseph, Mich., 25(2), 396–400.
6.
Goering, H. K., and Van Soest, P. J. ( 1970). “Forage fiber analyses (Apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications).” Agricultural handbook number 379, U.S. Department of Agriculture-ARS, Washington, D.C.
7.
Goering, H. K., Van Soest, P. J., and Hemken, R. W. ( 1973). “Relative susceptibility of forage to heat damage as affected by moisture, temperature, and pH.” J. Dairy Sci., 56, 137–143.
8.
Grismer, M. E. ( 1990). “Leaching fraction, soil salinity and drainage efficiency.” California Agr., 44(6), 24–27.
9.
Grismer, M. E. ( 1992). “Cracks in irrigated soil may allow some drainage.” California Agr., 46(5), 9–12.
10.
Grismer, M. E. (2001). “Regional alfalfa yield, ETc, and water value in western states.”J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., ASCE, 127(3), 131–139.
11.
Grismer, M. E., and Bali, K. M. ( 1998). “Subsurface drainage systems have little impact on water tables, salinity of clay soils.” California Agr., 52(5), 18–22.
12.
Grismer, M. E., Bali, K. M., and Robinson, F. E. (1995). “Field-scale neutron probe calibration and variance analysis for clay soil.”J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., ASCE, 121(5), 354–362.
13.
Grismer, M. E., and Tod, I. C. (1991). “Drainage of clay overlying an artesian aquifer. I: Hydrologic assessment.”J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., ASCE, 117(2), 255–270.
14.
Grismer, M. E., and Tod, I. C. ( 1994). “Field procedure helps calculate irrigation time for cracking clay soil.” California Agr., 48(4), 33–36.
15.
Jensen, M. E. ( 1995). “Water use assessment of the Imperial Irrigation District.” Internal Rep. Prepared for IID.
16.
Li, X., Feng, Y., and Boersma, L. ( 1993). “Comparison of osmotic adjustment responses to water and temperature stresses in spring wheat and sudangrass.” Annal. Botany, 71(4), 303–310.
17.
Maas, E. V., and Hoffman, G. J. (1977). “Crop salt tolerance—Current assessment.”J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., ASCE, 103(2), 115–134.
18.
Mayberry, K. S., et al. ( 1996). “Guidelines to production costs and practices for Imperial County—Field crops.” UCCE-Imperial County Circular 104-F.
19.
Official methods of analysis, 13th Ed. (1980). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D.C.
20.
Putnam, D., and Kallenbach, R. ( 1997). “Growers face critical juncture in desert forage production.” California Agr., 51(3), 12–16.
21.
Rhoades, J. D., et al. (1997). “Salt distribution in cracking soils and salt pickup by runoff waters.”J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., ASCE, 123(5), 323–328.
22.
Tod, I. C., and Grismer, M. E. (1991). “Drainage of clay overlying an artesian aquifer. II: Technical analysis.”J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., ASCE, 117(2), 271–284.
23.
Tod, I. C., Grismer, M. E., and Wallender, W. W. (1991). “Measurement of irrigation flows through irrigation turnouts.”J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., ASCE, 117(4), 596–599.
24.
Zimmerman, R. P. ( 1981). Soil survey of Imperial County, California, Imperial Valley area, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: Jan 4, 2001
Published online: Oct 1, 2001
Published in print: Oct 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.