Uniformity Evaluation of Cohesionless Specimens Using Digital Image Analysis
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 122, Issue 5
Abstract
Nonuniformity within specimens of granular materials is considered to be one of the major reasons for the dependence of the observed static/dynamic response during laboratory testing on the method of preparation. In this paper, a resin-impregnation/digital image analysis method to examine the uniformity of cohesionless specimens at microscopic, macroscopic, and global scales is described. The approach relies on the equivalence between volume fraction and the expected value of area fraction where the area fraction of voids on two-dimensional sections is obtained using a computer-based digital image analysis system. A sampling strategy which allows porosity variations in the vertical direction as well as in the radial direction of the specimen to be examined is proposed. The method is illustrated with the results of measurements performed on a typical specimen and shows that a much larger amount of nonuniformity exists when the soil is examined at a microscopic level. A statistical procedure to evaluate the accuracy of a volume-fraction measurement using areal analysis is also described. The proposed method offers much promise for examining the uniformity of specimens accurately and efficiently.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Castro, G. (1969). “Liquefaction of sands.”Harvard soils mech., Series No. 81.
2.
Clayton, C. R. I., Bica, A. V. D., and Moore, S. R.(1994). “A resin-impregnation technique for the determination of the density variations in completed specimens of dry cohesionless soil.”Géotechnique, London, England, 44(1), 165–173.
3.
Frost, J. D. (1989). “Studies on the monotonic and cyclic behavior of sands,” PhD dissertation, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, Ind.
4.
Gilbert, P. A. (1984). “Investigation of density variation in triaxial test specimen of cohesionless soil subjected to cyclic and monotonic loading.”Tech. Rep. GL-84-10, U.S. Army Engrs., Wtrwys. Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss.
5.
Hilliard, J. E. (1968). “Measurement of volume in volume.”Quantitative microscopy, DeHoff, R. T., and Rhines, F. N., eds., McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y.
6.
Hilliard, J. E., and Cahn, J. W. (1961). “An evaluation of procedures in quantitative metallography for volume-fraction analysis.”Trans., Metallurgical Soc. of AIME, Vol. 221, 344–352.
7.
Kuo, C.-Y., and Frost, J. D. (1995). “Quantifying the fabric of granular materials—an image analysis approach.”Rep. No. GIT-CEE/GEO-95-1, Georgia Inst. of Technol., Atlanta, Ga.
8.
Mulilis, J. P., Seed, H. B., Chan, C. K., Mitchell, J. K., and Arulanandan, K.(1977). “Effects of sample preparation on sand liquefaction.”J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 103(2), 91–108.
9.
Shi, D., and Winslow, D.(1991). “Accuracy of a volume fraction measurement using areal image analysis.”J. Testing and Evaluation, 19(3), 210–213.
10.
Shockley, W. G., and Ahlvin, R. G. (1960). “Nonuniform conditions in triaxial test specimens.”Proc., Res. Conf. on Shear Strength of Cohesive Soils, ASCE, New York, N.Y., 341–357.
11.
Tan, S.-A., and Fwa, T.-F.(1991). “Influence of voids on density measurements of granular materials using gamma radiation techniques.”Geotech. Testing J., 14(3), 257–265.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 122 • Issue 5 • May 1996
Pages: 390 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: May 1, 1996
Published in print: May 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.