Model Studies of Effects on Lunar Soil of Chemical Explosions
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 120, Issue 10
Abstract
A total of 51 model tests of cratering and soil loosening were conducted using small charges of pentaerythritol tetranitrate detonated at different depths of burial and different gravitational accelerations in a lunar soil simulant to model conditions on the surface of the Moon. Model crater dimensions extrapolated to lunar conditions fall well within the range of sizes of craters expected to be useful in lunar construction. Apparent crater volumes reached their maximum at an optimum depth of burial of eight charge diameters. Modeling to check for adverse model scaling effects was conducted, and results indicated an absence of scaling effects for buried charges. Development of craters from half‐buried charges seems to be influenced by a nonfriction component of strength, which emphasizes the importance when modeling of satisfying laws of similarity, especially with regard to stresses. Cone‐penetration resistance was measured and established that all charges produced substantial loosening of the soil. Measurements of excavatability of the soil showed the same general picture; the results can be extrapolated as a first estimate of excavation effort required on the lunar surface.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Allton, J. H., Galindo, C. Jr., and Watts, L. A. (1985). “Guide to using lunar soil and simulants for experimentation.” Lunar bases and space activities of the 21st century, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, Tex., 551–558.
2.
Buckingham, E. (1914). “On physically similar systems; illustrations of the use of dimensional equations.” Phys. Rev., IV(4), 345.
3.
Carrier, W. D. III, Mitchell, J. K., and Mahmood, A. (1973). “The nature of lunar soil.” J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, 99(10), 813–832.
4.
Ferguson, K. A., and Ko, H. Y. (1981). “Centrifugal model of the cone penetrometer.” Proc., Specialty Conf. Cone Penetration Testing and Experience, ASCE, New York, N.Y., 108–127.
5.
Ferrero, V. H. (1988). “Further checks for scaling effects on explosion induced craters centrifuge model testing,” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Maryland College Park, College Park, Md.
6.
Gault, D. E., and Wedekind, J. A. (1977). Experimental hypervelocity impact into quartz sand—II, effects of gravitational acceleration, in impact and explosion cratering. D. J. Roddy, R. O. Pepin, and R. B. Merrill, eds., Pergamon Press, New York, N.Y., 1231–1244.
7.
Goodings, D. J., and Lin, C. P. (1994). “Geotechnical properties of Maryland Sanders lunar simulant.” ASTM Geotech. Testing J.
8.
Graf, J. C. (1993). “Lunar soils grain size catalog,” NASA Reference Publication 1265, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C.
9.
Housen, K. R., Schmidt, R. M., and Holsapple, K. A. (1983). “Crater ejecta scaling laws: fundamental forms based on dimensional analysis.” J. Geophys. Res., 88(B3), 2485–2499.
10.
Houston, W. N., Namiq, L. I., Mitchell, J. K., and Tredwell, D. D. (1971). Lunar soil simulant studies, Lunar surface engineering properties experiment definition, Vol. 1. Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
11.
Lee, J. B. (1990). “Study on the experimental development of a rule‐based backhoe excavator,” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Maryland College Park, College Park, Md.
12.
Lin, C. P. (1991). “Model studies of the effects of explosion for application to the lunar surface,” PhD thesis Univ. of Maryland College Park, College Park, Md.
13.
Mitchell, J. K., and Houston, W. N. (1982). “Static penetration testing on the Moon.” Proc., 2nd Eur. Symp. on Penetration Testing, A. A. Balkema, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 277–284.
14.
Mitchell, J. K., Houston, W. N., Scott, R. F., Costes, N. C., Carrier, W. D. III, and Bromwell, L. G. (1972). “Mechanical properties of lunar soil: density, porosity, cohesion, and angle of internal friction.” Proc., 3rd Lunar Sci. Conf., MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 3235–3253.
15.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). (1989). “Report of the 90‐day study on human exploration of the Moon and Mars,” NASA, Washington, D.C.
16.
Piekutowski, A. J. (1974). “Laboratory‐scale high‐explosive cratering and ejecta phenomenology studies.” Rep. No. AFWL‐TR‐72‐155, Defense Nuclear Agency, Washington, D.C.
17.
Schmidt, R. M., and Holsapple, K. A. (1978). “Centrifuge crater experiments I: dry granular soils.” Rep. No. DNA 4568F, Defense Nuclear Agency, Washington, D.C.
18.
Schmidt, R. M., and Holsapple, K. A. (1980). “Theory and experiments on centrifuge cratering.” J. Geophys. Res., 85(B1), 235–252.
19.
Schmidt, R. M., Holsapple, K. A., and Housen, K. R. (1986). “Gravity effects in cratering.” Rep. No. DNA 001‐882‐C‐0301, Defense Nuclear Agency, Washington, D.C.
20.
Seranno, C. H. (1987). “A check for scaling effects on explosion induced crater‐ centrifuge model testing.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Maryland College Park, College Park, Md.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 120 • Issue 10 • October 1994
Pages: 1684 - 1703
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 26, 1992
Published online: Oct 1, 1994
Published in print: Oct 1994
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.