Pullout Tests Using Steel Grid Reinforcements with Low‐Quality Backfill
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 118, Issue 7
Abstract
Both laboratory and field pullout tests are conducted using steel grid reinforcements with cohesive‐frictional backfill soils. The laboratory pullout tests are performed using a large‐scale pullout apparatus designed especially for this study. The field pullout tests are performed on the dummy welded‐wire reinforcements embedded in a full‐scale reinforced test wall/embankment system that utilize three different locally available, low‐quality, cohesive‐frictional backfill soils, namely, clayey sand, lateritic soil, and weathered clay, in the three sections along its length. It is observed that the magnitudes of the mobilized field pullout resistances as well as the strains induced in the reinforcing elements are strongly influenced by the response of the wall/embankment system to the subsoil movements and the resulting arching effects due to the presence of the inextensible reinforcements. Meanwhile, the laboratory pullout test results generally seem to provide a conservative approximation of the field pullout resistances of the grid reinforcements in cohesive‐frictional backfills. Using the finite element method to model the laboratory pullout tests, the analytical results are observed to agree fairly well with the experimental results.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Amin, N. U. (1989). “Direct shear and pullout tests on lateritic soil at low pressure,” M Eng thesis, Asian Inst. of Tech., Bangkok, Thailand.
2.
Bergado, D. T., Bukkanasuta, A., and Balasubramaniam, A. S. (1987). “Laboratory pullout tests using bamboo and polymer geogrids including a case study.” Geotext. Geomembr., 5(3), 153–189.
3.
Bergado, D. T., Cisneros, C. B., Sampaco, C. L., Shivashankar, R., and Alfaro, M. C. (1989). “Pullout resistance of steel grids with weathered clay backfill.” Proc. Symp. on Application of Geosynthetic and Geofiber in Southeast Asia, Institution of Engineers, 1–26 to 1–33.
4.
Bergado, D. T., Sampaco, C. L., Shivashankar, R., Alfaro, M. C., Anderson, L. R., and Balasubramaniam, A. S. (1990). “Interaction of welded wire reinforcement with poor quality backfill.” Proc., 10th Southeast Asian Geotech. Conf., Chinese Institute of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, 1, 29–34.
5.
Bergado, D. T., Sampaco, C. L., Shivashankar, R., Alfaro, M. C., Anderson, L. R., and Balasubramaniam, A. S. (1991). “Performance of welded wire wall with poor quality backfills on soft clay.” ASCE Geotech. Engrg. Congress, ASCE, New York, N.Y.
6.
Chang, J. C., Hannon, J. B., and Forsyth, R. A. (1977). “Pullout resistance and interaction of earthwork reinforcement and soil.” Transp. Res. Record 640, 1–7.
7.
Cisneros, C. B. (1989). “Pullout resistance of steel grids with weathered clay asbackfill materials,” M Eng. thesis, Asian Inst. of Tech., Bangkok, Thailand.
8.
Duncan, J. M., and Chang, C. Y. (1970). “Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., ASCE, 96(5), 1629–1653.
9.
Hardiyatimo, H. C. (1990). “Behavior of mechanically stabilized embankment on soft Bangkok clay,” M Eng. thesis, Asian Inst. of Tech., Bangkok, Thailand.
10.
Ingold, T. S. (1983). “Laboratory pullout testing of grid reinforcement in clay.” Geotech. Test. J., 6(3), 112–119.
11.
Jewell, R. A., Milligan, G. W. E., Sarsby, R. W., and Dubois, D. (1984). “Interaction between soil and geogrids.” Proc. of the Symp. on Polymer Reinforcement in Civil Engrg., Thomas Telford Ltd., London, U.K., 19–29.
12.
Juran, I., Knochenmos, G., Acar, Y. B., and Arman, A. (1988). “Pullout response of geotextiles and geogrids (synthesis of available experimental data). “Geosynthetics for soil improvements, R. D. Holtz, ed., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 92–111.
13.
Lo, K. H. (1990). “Modeling of laboratory and field pullout test of steel geogrid reinforcement,” M Eng. thesis, Asian Inst. of Tech., Bangkok, Thailand.
14.
Macatol, K. C. B. (1990). “Interaction of laterite backfill and steel grid reinforcements at high vertical stress using pullout tests,” M Eng. thesis, Asian Inst. of Tech., Bangkok, Thailand.
15.
Nielsen, M. R., and Anderson, L. R. (1984). Pullout resistance of wire mats embedded in soil. Utah State Univ., Logan, Utah.
16.
Ochiai, H., and Sakai, A. (1987). “Analytical method for geogrid reinforced soil structures.” Proc. of the Int. Symp. on Geosynthetics, Japanese Chapter of International Geotechnical Society, 483–486.
17.
Palmiera, E. M., and Milligan, G. W. E. (1989). “Scale and other factors affecting the results of pullout tests of grids buried in sand.” Geotechnique, 39(3), 515–524.
18.
Peterson, L. M., and Anderson, L. R. (1980). “Pullout resistance of welded wire mats embedded in soil,” M Sci. thesis, Utah State Univ., Logan, Utah.
19.
Schmertmann, G. R., Chew, S. H., and Mitchell, J. K. (1989). “Finite element modelling of reinforced soil wall behavior.” Geotech. Engrg. Report UCBIGTI89‐01, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
20.
Skempton, A. W. (1951). “The bearing capacity of clay.” Proc. Building Research Congress, England, 1.
21.
Welded wire wall construction guide. (1988). Hilfiker‐Texas Corp., Eureka, Calif.
22.
Zienkiewicz, O. C., Valliappan, A., and King, O. P. (1969). “Elastoplastic solutions of engineering problems: Initial stress, finite element approach.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 1(1), 75–10.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1992
Published in print: Jul 1992
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.