Contractor’s Opportunistic Bidding Behavior and Equilibrium Price Level in the Construction Market
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 133, Issue 6
Abstract
The competitive bidding system has been to blame for abnormally low bids, which are considered as one of the main causes of poor project quality. Previous studies have regarded the pricing of bidders as an optimum decision based on contractor’s cost and market competition level. However, the sell to produce characteristic of construction projects may induce contractors to offer a low bid and then make up the amount initially sacrificed from beyond-contractual reward (BCR) gained through cutting corners and claims. System dynamics was adopted in this study to develop a contractor’s pricing model with consideration of the dimensions of cost, market competition, and BCR. The model was then examined by statistical analysis of data collected from 44 highway projects in Taiwan. It was found that the equilibrium market price is significantly associated with BCR, which is assumed to be determined by the strictness of the owner’s construction management, including both soundness of contract and tightness in construction supervision. Research results suggest that contractors divide the market into different segments according to the owner’s strictness of construction management and the equilibrium price level of each market segment varies. The price level for projects with a strict owner is remarkably higher than for those with relatively less strict owners. Improvement in the construction management system of projects is crucial to lower the possibility that contractors gain BCR and do opportunistic bidding, and to further enhance project quality.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Capen, E. C., Clapp, R. V., and Campbell, W. M. (1971). “Competitive bidding in high risk situations.” JPT, J. Pet. Technol., 23(6), 641–653.
Carlton, D. W., and Perloff, J. M. (2000). Modern industrial organization, 3rd Ed., Longman.
Carr, R. I. (1982). “General bidding model.” J. Constr. Div., 108(4), 639–650.
Carr, R. I. (1983). “Impact of number of bidders on competition.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 109(1), 61–73.
Chasey, A. D., de la Garza, J. M., and Drew, D. R. (2002). “Using simulation to understand the impact of deferred maintenance.” Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 17(4), 269–279.
Crowley, L. G., and Hancher, D. E. (1995a). “Evaluation of competitive bids.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 121(2), 238–245.
Crowley, L. G., and Hancher, D. E. (1995b). “Risk assessment of competitive procurement.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 121(2), 230–237.
De, S., Fedenia, M., and Triantis, A. J. (1996). “Effects of competition on bidder returns.” J. Corporate Finance, 2(3), 261–282.
Doyle, W. J., and DeStephanis, A. (1990). “Preparing bids to avoid claims.” Construction bidding law, R. F. Cushman and W. J. Doyle, eds., Wiley, New York, 17–45.
Drew, D., Skitmore, M., and Lo, H. P. (2001). “The effect of client and type and size of construction work on a contractor’s bidding strategy.” Build. Environ., 36(3), 393–406.
Drew, D. S., and Skitmore, R. M. (1992). “Competitiveness in bidding: A consultant’s perspective.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 10(3), 227–247.
Friedman, L. (1956). “A competitive bidding strategy.” Oper. Res., 4(1), 104–112.
Grogan, T. (1992). “Low bids raise hidden costs.” Eng. News-Rec., 228(13), 30–31.
Hardy, M. A. (1993). “Regression with dummy variables.” Quantitative applications in the social sciences, SAGE University Press, London.
Henriod, E. E., and Lanteran, J. M. (1988). Trends in contracting practice for civil works, Task Force on Innovative Practice, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Ho, S. P., and Liu, L. Y. (2004). “Analytical model for analyzing construction claims and opportunistic bidding.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 130(1), 94–104.
Ioannou, P. G., and Leu, S. S. (1993). “Average-bid method—Competitive bidding strategy.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 119(1), 131–147.
Maher, M. (1997). Cost accounting: Creating value for management, 5th Ed., Irwin/McGraw-Hill, New York.
Rodrigues, A., and Bowers, J. (1996). “The role of system dynamics in project management.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 14(4), 213–220.
Rooke, J., Seymour, D., and Fellows, R. (2004). “Planning for claims: An ethnography of industry culture.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 22(6), 655–662.
Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics—Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world, International Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Taiwan Construction Research Institute. (2000). “The gloomy 2000 for construction companies—Results of an industry-wide questionnaire survey in Taiwan.” Construction News Record, 19(12), 22–31 (in Chinese).
Varian, H. R. (1992). Microeconomic analysis, 3rd Ed., W. W. Norton and Company, Inc.
Wang, W. C. (2004). “Supporting project cost threshold decisions via a mathematical cost model.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 22(2), 99–108.
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism, Free Press, New York.
Winch, G. M. (2000). “Institutional reform in British construction: Partnering and private finance.” Build. Res. Inf., 28(2), 141–155.
Yang, J. B., and Wang, W. C. (2003). “Contractor selection by most advantageous tendering approach in Taiwan.” J. Chin. Inst. Eng., 26(3), 381–387.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 133 • Issue 6 • June 2007
Pages: 409 - 416
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: Dec 6, 2005
Accepted: Dec 28, 2006
Published online: Jun 1, 2007
Published in print: Jun 2007
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.