TECHNICAL PAPERS
Aug 1, 2006

A Study of Styles and Outcomes in Construction Dispute Negotiation

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 132, Issue 8

Abstract

The adversarial nature of the construction industry contributes to the germination and manifestation of construction disputes. Negotiation between the disputants is most often the first attempt in getting disputes resolved. During negotiation, personality characteristics of the disputants affect their behavior and thus the outcomes. Understanding the negotiating behaviors and negotiation outcomes is therefore of both academic and practical value. This paper reports such a study conducted with construction professionals in Hong Kong. The Rahim Organizational Conflict Inventory-II was used to measure the negotiating styles of construction professionals. Taxonomies of negotiation outcomes were developed through a principal component factor analysis. Three functional and four dysfunctional negotiation outcomes were identified. Based on these results, the relationships between the negotiating styles and negotiation outcomes were examined by the use of the multiple regression analyses. The findings suggested that the use of obliging, dominating, and avoiding styles are less influential in achieving functional negotiation outcomes. However, integrating negotiating styles is found to be useful to achieve functional outcomes and the use of comprising styles is a practical approach in resolving dispute. These findings are therefore supportive of the notion of the contingent use of negotiating styles.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers are thankful for the constructive comments of the reviewers. The work described in this study was fully supported by a CityU Research Grant (Project No. UNSPECIFIED7001597).

References

Allred, K. (2000). “Distinguishing best and strategic practices: A framework for managing dilemma between creating and claiming value.” Negotiation J., 16(4), 387–397.
Ben-Yoav, O., and Pruitt, D. G. (1984a). “Accountability to constituents: A two-edged sword.” Organ Behav. Hum. Perform., 34(3), 283–295.
Ben-Yoav, O., and Pruitt, D. G. (1984b). “Resistance to yielding and the expectation of cooperative future interaction in negotiation.” J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 20(4), 323–335.
Blake, R. R., and Mouton, J. S. (1964). The managerial grid, Gulf, Houston.
Blake, R. R., and Mouton, J. S. (1970). “The fifth achievement.” J. Appl. Behav. Sci., 6(4), 413–436.
Brown, H., and Marriott, A. (1999). ADR principles and practice, Sweet and Maxwell, London.
Carnevale, P., and Pruitt, D. (1992). “Negotiation and mediation.” Annu. Rev. Psychol., 43, 531–582.
Chakrabarty, S., Brown, G., and Gilbert, A. H. (2002). “Evaluation of Rahim’s organizational conflict inventory-II as a measure of conflict-handling styles in a sample of Indian salespersons.” Psychol. Rep., 90, 549–567.
Cheung, S. O. (1998). “Values of alternative dispute resolution in construction.” Constr. Law J., 14(2), 101–110.
Cheung, S. O., Suen, C. H., and Lam, T. L. (2002). “Fundamentals of alternative dispute resolution processes in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 128(5), 409–417.
Cheung, S. O., Tam, C. M., Ndekugri, I., and Harris, F. C. (2000). “Factors affecting clients’ project dispute resolution satisfaction in Hong Kong.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 18(3), 281–294.
Cheung, S. O., and Yeung, Y. W. (1998). “The effectiveness of the dispute resolution advisor system: A critical appraisal.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 16(6), 367–374.
Cheung, S. O., and Yeung, Y. W. (2002). “The effectiveness of the dispute resolution advisor system: A critical appraisal.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 16(6), 367–374.
Cheung, S. O., Yiu, T. W., and Suen, C. H. (2004). “Construction Negotiation Online.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 130(6), 844–852.
Conrad, C. (1991). “Communication in conflict: Style-strategy relationships.” Communication Monographs, 58(2), 135–155.
Douglas, A. (1962). Industrial peacemaking, Columbia University Press, New York.
Druckman, D., Harris, R., and Ramberg, B. (2002). “Computer-assisted international negotiation: A tool for research and practice.” Group Decision and Negotiation, 11(3), 231–256.
Environment, Transport and Works Bureau (ETWB. (2002). “Marking Scheme in Tender Evaluation for Works Contracts.” Works Bureau Technical Circular No. 22/2002, Hong Kong.
Fenn, P., Lowe, D., and Speck, C. (1997). “Conflict and dispute in construction.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 15(6), 513–518.
Fisher, R., and Ury, W. (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiation agreement without giving in, Viking, New York.
Follett, M. P. (1940). “Constructive conflict.” H. C. Metcalf and L. Urwick, eds., Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett, Harper, New York (original work published 1926).
Friedman, R. A., Currall, S. C., and Tsai, J. C. (2000). “What goes around comes around: The impact of personal conflict style on work conflict and stress.” The International Journal of Conflict Management, 11(1), 32–55.
Goldberg, S. B., Sander, F. E. A., and Roger, N. H. (1992). Dispute resolution—Negotiation, mediation, and other processes, Aspen Law & Business, New York.
Griffith, T., Tansil, D., and Benson, L. (2002). “Negotiating technology implementation: An empirical investigation of a website introduction.” Group Decision and Negotiation, 11(1), 1–22.
Gross, M. A., and Guerrero, L. K. (2000). “Managing conflict appropriately and effectively: An application of the competence model to Rahim’s organizational conflict styles.” The International Journal of Conflict Management, 11(3), 200–226.
Hair, A., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis, 5th Ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Hammock, G. S., and Richardson, D. R. (1991). “Aggression as one response to conflict.” J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., 22(3), 298–311.
Hammock, G. S., Richardson, D. R., Pilkington, C. J., and Utley, M. (1990). “Measurement of conflict in social relationships.” Personality and Individual Differences, 11(6), 577–583.
Hibberd, P., and Newman, P. (1999). ADR and adjudication in construction disputes, Blackwell Science, London.
Hills, M. J. (1992). “A case for an alternative approach to the resolution of dispute under JCT 80 standard form of building contract.” MSc dissertation, University of Bath.
Holsapple, C., Lai, H., and Whinston, A. (1998). “A formal basis for negotiation support system.” Group Decision and Negotiation, 7(3), 203–227.
Holt, G. (1997). “Construction research questionnaire and attitude measurement: Relative index or mean.” J. Constr. Procure., 3(2), 88–94.
Kagel, J., and Roth, A. E. (1991). Handbook of experimental economics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
Lee, C. (1990). “Relative status of employees and styles of handling interpersonal conflict: An experimental study with Korean managers.” International Journal of Conflict Management, 1(4), 327–340.
Lee, Y., Zoonky, L., and Larsen, K. R. T. (2003). “Coping with internet channel conflict.” Commun. ACM, 46(7), 137–142.
Levy, M. B. (1989). “Integration of lovestyles and attachment styles: Cross-partner influences and a clarification of concepts, measurement and conceptualization.” Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina, Columbia, S.C.
Lewicki, R. J., and Litterer, J. (1985). Negotiations, Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, Ill.
Li, H. (1996). “Case-based reasoning for intelligent support of construction negotiation.” Inf. Manage., 30(5), 231–238.
Likert, R., and Likert, J. G. (1976). New ways of managing conflict, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Loosemore, M. (1999). “Bargaining tactics in construction disputes.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 17(2), 177–188.
Lytle, A., Brett, J., and Shapiro, D. (1999). “The strategic use of interests, rights, and power to resolve disputes.” Negotiation J., 15(1), 31–51.
Mintu-Wimsatt, A., and Calantone, R. (1996). “Exploring factors that affect negotiator’s problem-solving orientation.” Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 11(6), 61–73.
Murninghan, J. K. (1991). The dynamics of bargaining games, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Nash, J. F. (1950). “Equilibrium points in n-person games.” Proc., Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 36, 48–49.
Newcombe, R. (1996). “Empowering the construction project team.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 14(2), 75–80.
Oetzel, J. G. (1998). “The effects of self-construals and ethnicity on self-reported conflict styles.” Communication Reports, 11(2), 133–143.
Perdue, B. C., Day, R. L., and Michaels, R. E. (1986). “Negotiating styles of industrial buyers.” Industrial Marketing Management, 15(3), 171–176.
Prein, H. C. M. (1976). “Stijlen van conflicthanteing (Styles of handling conflict).” Ned Tijdschr Psychol., 31, 321–346.
Pruitt, D. G. (1981). Negotiation behavior, Academic, New York.
Pruitt, D. G., Carnevale, P. J., Ben-Yoav, O., Nochajski, T. H., and Van Slyck, M. (1983). “Incentives for cooperation in a integrative bargaining.” R. Tietz, ed., Aspiration levels in bargaining and economic decision making, Springer, Berlin, 22–34.
Rahim, M. A. (1983). Rahim organization conflict inventories: Professional manual, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, Calif.
Rahim, M. A. (1992). Managing conflict in organizations, 2nd Ed., Praeger, London.
Rahim, M. A. (2001). Managing conflict in organizations, 3rd Ed., Quorum Books, Westport, Conn.
Rahim, M. A. (2002). “Toward a theory of managing organizational conflict.” The International Journal of Conflict Management, 13(3), 206–235.
Rahim, M. A., and Bonoma, T. V. (1979). “Managing organizational conflict: A model for diagnosis and intervention.” Psychol. Rep., 44, 1323–1344.
Rahim, M. A., and Magner, N. R. (1995). “Confirmatory factor analysis of the styles of handling interpersonal conflict: First-order factor model and its invariance across groups.” J. Appl. Psychol., 80, 122–132.
Rahim, M. A., Manger, N. R., and Shapiro, D. L. (2000). “Do justice perceptions influence styles of handling conflict with supervisors?: What justice perceptions, precisely?” The International Journal of Conflict Management, 11(1), 9–31.
Ren, Z., Anumba, C. J., and Ugwu, O. O. (2003). “The development of multi-agent system for construction claims negotiation.” Adv. Eng. Software, 34(11–12), 683–696.
Rhys Jones, S. (1994). “How constructive is construction law?” Constr. Law J., 10(1), 28–38.
Rosch, E. (1988). “Principles of categorization.” A. Collins and E. Smith, eds., Readings in cognitive science: A perspective from psychology and artificial intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, Calif.
Ruble, T. L., and Thomas, K. W. (1976). “Support for a two-dimensional model of conflict behavior.” Organ Behav. Hum. Perform., 16(1), 143–155.
Sharland, A. (2001). “The negotiation process as a predictor of relationship outcomes in international buyer-supplier arrangements.” Industrial Marketing Management, 30(7), 551–559.
Shell, G. R. (2001). “Bargaining styles and negotiation: The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument in Negotiation training.” Negotiation J., 17(2), 155–174.
Steven, C. M. (1963). Strategy and collective bargaining negotiation, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Thomas, K. W. (1976). “Conflict and conflict management.” M. D. Dunnette, ed., Handling of industry and organization psychology, Rand McNally, Chicago, 889–935.
Ting-Toomey, S., Geo, G., Trubisky, P., Yang, Z., Kim, H. S., Lin, S. L., and Nishida, T. (1991). “Culture, face maintenance, and styles of handling interpersonal conflict: A study in five cultures.” International Journal of Conflict Management, 2(3), 275–296.
Tutzauer, F., and Roloff, M. E. (1988). “Communication processes leading to integrative agreements: Three paths to joint benefits.” Communication Res., 15(4), 360–380.
Van de Vliert, E., and Kabanoff, B. (1990). “Toward theory-based measures of conflict management.” Acad. Manage J., 33(1), 199–209.
Walker, A. (2002). Project management in construction, Blackwell Science, London.
Walton, R., and McKersie, R. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiation: An analysis of a social interaction system, McGraw Hill, New York.
Zack, J. G. (1994). “The negotiation of settlements—A team sport.” Cost Eng., 36(8), 24–30.
Zeuthen, F. (1930). Problems of monopoly and economic warfare, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 132Issue 8August 2006
Pages: 805 - 814

History

Received: Jul 13, 2004
Accepted: Nov 23, 2005
Published online: Aug 1, 2006
Published in print: Aug 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sai On Cheung [email protected]
Construction Dispute Resolution Research Unit, Dept. of Building and Construction, City Univ. of Hong Kong, Hong Kong (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Tak Wing Yiu
Construction Dispute Resolution Research Unit, Dept. of Building and Construction, City Univ. of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Sau Fung Yeung
Construction Dispute Resolution Research Unit, Dept. of Building and Construction, City Univ. of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share