Comparative Injury and Fatality Risk Analysis of Building Trades
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 132, Issue 5
Abstract
Occupational injury and fatality risk analysis was performed on 16 building trades in the study reported herein. The approach was based on defining risk fundamentally as the product of probability (frequency) and severity, and using the risk plane concept to evaluate and rank the trades in terms of nonfatal injury rates. A parameter named index of relative risk was then used for fatality rate based ranking, and the results separately obtained from these analyses were integrated into a combined risk score for arriving at final rankings. Bureau of Labor Statistics data was used in the study. The risk analysis methodology included both frequency and severity considerations associated with nonfatal injuries. It was observed that simultaneous consideration of frequency and severity gives more comprehensive results than performing risk analysis based exclusively on either frequency or severity. The findings of the study indicated that ironworkers and roofers were the highest risk trades. The information derived from the methodology presented in this paper should be particularly valuable for risk managers, legal and liability experts, and project managers.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Baradan, S. (2004). “Comparative injury risk analysis of building trades.” Ph.D. dissertation, Wayne State Univ., Detroit.
Brauer, R. L. (1994). “Risk management and assessment.” Safety and health for engineers, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 527–543.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2001). “BLS statistics on worker safety and health.” Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) ⟨http://bls.gov/bls/safety.htm⟩ (May 25, 2005).
Clemens, P. L., and Simmons, R. J. (1998). “Risk assessment matrix.” System safety and risk management: A guide for engineering educators, Dept. of Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, II-1–12.
Cox, S., and Tait, R. (1998). “Risk assessment in occupational safety and health.” Safety, reliability and risk management: An integrated approach, 2nd Ed., London, 221–234.
Garner, C. A. (2004). “Construction safety program essentials.” Construction safety management and engineering, American Society of Safety Engineers, Des Plaines, Ill., 24–40.
Hinze, J. (1997). “The true costs of construction worker injuries.” Construction safety, Prentice-Hall, Columbus, Ohio, 50–70.
Hinze, J., and Applegate, L. L. (1991). “Costs of construction injuries.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 117(3), 537–550.
Levitt, R. E., and Samelson, N. M. (1987). “Putting accident costs up front.” Construction safety management, McGraw-Hill, New York, 17–28.
Liebing, R. (2001). “The players in construction.” The construction industry—Processes, players, and practices, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River N.J., 10–25.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). (1999). “High risk small business industries: A combined risk index.” Identifying high-risk small business industries—The basis for preventing occupational injury, illness and fatality, NIOSH Special Hazard Review, Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 74–79.
Quality Management and Quality Assurance Military Standard. (1984). “System safety program requirements.” MIL-STD-882B.
Robinson, M. R. (1979). “Accident cost accounting as a means of improving construction safety.” Technical Rep. No. 242, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Stanford Univ., Palo Alto, Calif.
Solomon, K. A., and Abraham, S. C. (1980). “The index of harm: A useful measure for comparing occupational risk across industries.” Health Phys., 38(3), 375–391.
Toscano, G. A. (1997). “Dangerous jobs.” Compensation and Working Conditions (CWC) Online, 2(2), 57–60.
University of Bath. (2003). “Integrated Risk Control Website.” ⟨http://www.bath.ac.uk/dacs/risk⟩ (Aug. 31, 2004).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 132 • Issue 5 • May 2006
Pages: 533 - 539
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: May 26, 2005
Accepted: Oct 19, 2005
Published online: May 1, 2006
Published in print: May 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.