TECHNICAL PAPERS
Oct 1, 2005

Reconstructing Cultures for Relational Contracting

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 131, Issue 10

Abstract

Although previous research has pointed to potential performance gains through relational contracting (RC), reservations remain as to its value and viability. Even those who wish to use RC need guidelines for introducing it, especially where it clashes with prevalent project cultures. A study was launched from Hong Kong to identify the critical factors which promote RC and team building in the context of specific cultures. This paper consolidates the perceptions of 60 respondents to a questionnaire survey in Singapore, in relation to the hypothesized 24 factors facilitating RC, and 28 factors impeding/deterring RC. It indicates the evident readiness of the Singaporean contracting industry to embrace collaborative working practices. On the whole: (1) all the 24 factors facilitating RC, and 23 of the 28 factors deterring RC, are significant; (2) these two sets of factors could be represented by six and seven “broad factors,” respectively; and (3) except in a few cases, respondents from large and medium companies, as well as with and without experience in RC, have similar perceptions of the importance of different factors. It was perceived that trust should be at the core of RC approaches to construction procurement, but also seen that the current level of trust is low. Identifying the principal “facilitators” and “impediments”/ deterrents to RC, provides pointers to building relationally integrated teams to boost performance to much higher levels, as are now expected from the industry. The literature indicates that the outcome of the survey in Singapore reflects the trends in many countries that are moving toward RC. This research model and approach may be conveniently replicated in other contractual regimes, in order to reinforce these observations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgment

Grant No. UNSPECIFIEDHKU/7011/02E from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council is gratefully acknowledged.

References

Alsagoff, S. A., and McDermott, P. (1994). “Relational contracting: A prognosis for the UK construction industry?” Proc., CIB W92, Procurement Systems—East Meets West, S. M. Rowlinson, ed., Univ. of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 11–19.
Australian Constructors Association. (1999). Relationship contracting, Sydney, Australia.
Black, C., Akintoye, A., and Fitzgerald, E. (2000). “An analysis of success factors and benefits of partnering in construction.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 18(6), 423–432.
Bresnen, M., and Marshall, N. (2000). “Motivation, commitment and the use of incentives in partnerships and alliances.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 18(5), 587–598.
Chan, A. P. C., Chan, D. W. M., Chiang, Y. H., Tang, B. S., Chan, E. H. W., and Ho, K. S. K. (2004). “Exploring critical success factors for partnering in construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 130(2), 188–198.
Chan, A. P. C., Chan, D. W. M., and Ho, K. S. K. (2003). “An empirical study of the benefits of construction partnering in Hong Kong.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 21(5), 523–533.
Cheng, E. W. L., and Li, H. (2001) “Development of a conceptual model of construction partnering.” Eng., Constr., Archit. Manage., 8(4), 292–303.
Cheung, S. O., Ng, T. S. T., Wong, S. P., and Suen, H. C. H. (2003). “Behavioural aspects in construction partnering.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 21(5), 333–343.
Coase, R. H. (1988). The firm, the market and the law, The Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (1996). The partnering process—Its benefits, implementation, and measurement, Univ. of Texas Press, Austin, Tex.
Construction Industry Review Committee (CIRC). (2001). Construct for excellence, The Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong.
Construction 21 Committee. (1999) Construction 21: Reinventing construction, Ministry of Manpower and Ministry of National Development, Singapore.
Cowan, C., Gray, C., and Larson, E. (1992). “Project partnering.” Proj. Manage. J., 22(4), 5–11.
Crane, T. G., Felder, J. P., Thompson, M. G., and Sanders, S. R. (1997). “Partnering process model.” J. Manage. Eng., 13(3), 57–63.
Dulaimi, M. F., and Hong, G. S. (2002). “The factors influencing bid mark-up of large- and medium-size contractors in Singapore.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 20(7), 601-611.
Egan, J. (1998). Rethinking construction, Dept. of the Environment, Transport and Regions, London.
Elangovan, A. R., and Shapiro, D. L. (1998). “Betrayal of trust in organizations.” Acad. Manage. Rev., 23(3), 547–566.
Gordon, C. M. (1994). “Choosing appropriate construction contracting method.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 120(1), 196–210.
Grabher, G. (1993). The embedded firm: On the socio-economics of industrial networks, Routledge, London.
Harback, H. F., Basham, D. L., and Buhts, R. E. (1994). “Partnering paradigm.” J. Manage. Eng., 10(1), 23–27.
Harris, F., and McCaffer, R. (2001). Modern construction management, Blackwell Science, Malden, Mass.
Holt, G. D., Love, P. E. D., and Li, H. (2000). “The learning organization: A paradigm for mutually beneficial strategic construction alliances.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 18(6), 415–423.
Hughes, W., and Maeda, Y. (2002). Construction contract policy: Do we mean what we say? RICS Research Papers, Vol. 4, No. 12, RICS, London, U.K.
Jeffries, F. L., and Reed, R. (2000). “Trust and adaptation in relational contracting.” Acad. Manage. Rev., 25(4), 873–882.
Jones, D. (2002). “Relationship: Partnering, alliancing and other affairs.” Paper presented to the Society of Construction Law, Hong Kong, May 7.
Kanter, R. M. (1989). “Becoming PALs: Pooling, allying, and linking across companies.” Acad. Manage. Executive, 3(3), 183–193.
Kim, J. O., and Mueller, C. W. (1978). Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, Calif.
Kumaraswamy, M. M., Ling, F. Y. Y., Rahman, M. M., and Phng, S. T. (2005). “Constructing relationally integrated teams.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(10).
Kumaraswamy, M. M., Rowlinson, S., Rahman M. M., and Phua, F. (2002). “Strategies for triggering the required ‘cultural revolution’ in the construction industry.” Perspectives on culture in construction, CIB Publication No. 275, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 268–285.
Larson, E. and Drexler, J. A. (1997). “Barriers to project partnering: Report from the firing line.” Proj. Manage. J., 28(1), 46–52.
Lazar, F. D. (1997). “Partnering—New benefits from peering inside the black box.” J. Manage. Eng., 13(6), 75–83.
Li, H., Cheng, E. W. L., and Love, P. E. D. (2000). “Partnering research in construction.” Eng., Constr., Archit. Manage., 7(1), 76–92.
Lingard., H., Chinyio E., and Hughes, W. (1998). “The impact of contractor selection method on transaction costs: a review.” J. Constr. Procure., 4(2), 89–102.
Macaulay, S. (1963). “Non-contractual relations in business: A preliminary study.” Am. Sociol. Rev., 28(1), 55–67.
Macneil, I. R. (1974). “The many futures of contracts.” South. Calif. Law Rev., 47(3), 691–816.
Macneil I. R. (1980). The new social contracts, Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, Conn.
Norušis, M. J. (2002). SPSS 11.0 guide to data analysis, Prentice–Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Rahman, M. M. (2003). “Revitalising construction project procurement through joint risk management.” PhD thesis, The Univ. of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Rahman, M. M., and Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2002). “Joint risk management through transactionally efficient relational contracting.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 20(1), 45–54.
Rahman, M. M., and Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2004). “Contracting relationship trends and transitions.” J. Manage. Eng., 20(4), 147–161.
Rahman, M. M., Kumaraswamy, M. M., and Ng, S. T. (2003). “Re-engineering construction project teams.” Proc., ASCE Construction Research Congress, K. R. Molenaar and P. S. Chinowsky, Eds., Construction Institute–Construction Research Council, Honolulu, Hawaii, (CD Rom).
Sanders, S. R., and Moore, M. M. (1992). “Perceptions on partnering in the public sector.” Proj. Manage. J., 23(4), 13–19.
Thompson, P. J., and Sanders, S. R. (1998). “Partnering continuum.” J. Manage. Eng., 14(5), 73–78.
Walker, A. (1989). Project management in construction, BSP Professional Books, Oxford, U.K.
Walker A., and Chau, K. K. (1999). “The relationship between construction project management theory and transaction cost economics.” Eng., Constr., Archit. Manage., 6(2), 166–176.
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism, Free Press, New York.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 131Issue 10October 2005
Pages: 1065 - 1075

History

Received: Jun 12, 2004
Accepted: Jan 12, 2005
Published online: Oct 1, 2005
Published in print: Oct 2005

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mohan M. Kumaraswamy, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, The Univ. of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong. E-mail: [email protected]
M. Motiar Rahman, M.ASCE [email protected]
Post Doctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil Engineering, The Univ. of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Florence Yean Ling [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Building, National Univ. of Singapore, Singapore, E-mail: [email protected]
Siew Ting Phng
Quantity Surveyor, Gammon, Singapore.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share