Empirical Study of Strategic Performance of Global Construction Firms
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 130, Issue 6
Abstract
This paper presents an empirical study of factors contributing to the success and failure of 24 large international construction firms originating in the United States, Europe, and Japan. The study is conducted using fundamental analysis, a methodology that is commonly applied in economics and investment practices to study the prospects of a company. Based on publicly available data, both quantitative and qualitative measures are developed and assessed collectively to derive insightful knowledge about corporate strategy and firm outlook. Preliminary conclusions drawn from this study include: (1) A universal formula for success is elusive—critical success factors can be uniquely derived from different modes of operational, financial, technological, and human-related conditions and (2) causes of failure are diverse, thus construction firms must consistently check the downside risks of all measures. Thus, debates concerning the merits of common dichotomies such as diversification versus focused differentiation appear rather hollow. These aspects of strategy are far from fixed and should instead be treated as variables. The findings suggest that an open perspective of strategy is necessary in construction organizations and provide the foundation for the development of a new strategic model for the industry.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Cheah, Y.J. ( 2002). “Fundamental analysis and conceptual model for corporate strategy in global engineering and construction markets.” PhD dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
2.
Chinowsky, P.S. ( 2000). Strategic corporate management for engineering, Oxford University Press, New York.
3.
Chinowsky, P. S., Meredith, J. E. (2000). “Strategic management in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 126(1), 1–9.
4.
Engineering News Record. ( 1999). “The top 225 international constractors—Taking stock.” Aug. 16.
5.
Engineering New Record. ( 2000). “The top 225 international contractors—Slow growth, high hopes.” Aug. 14.
6.
Engineering News Record. ( 2001). “The top 225 international contractors—Firms scramble to better positions in quiet market.” Aug. 20.
7.
Haskins, M.E., Ferris, H.R., and Selling, T.I. ( 2000). International financial reporting and analysis: A contextual emphasis, McGraw–Hill, New York.
8.
Kale, S., and Arditi, D. (2002). “Competitive positioning in United States construction industry.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 128(3), 238–247.
9.
Mintzberg, H. ( 1979). The structuring of organizations, Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
10.
Porter, M.E. ( 1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance, Free Press, New York.
11.
Partt, J. ( 2000). Financial accounting in an economic context, South-Western College Publishing, Cincinnati.
12.
Rumelt, R.P., Schendel, D.E., and Teece, D.J. ( 1994). Fundamental issues in strategy: A research agenda, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
13.
Venegas, P., and Alarcón, L. (1997). “Selecting long-term strategies for construction firms.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 123(4), 388–398.
14.
Warszawski, A. (1996). “Strategic planning in construction companies.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 122(2), 133–140.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 130 • Issue 6 • December 2004
Pages: 808 - 817
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 ASCE.
History
Published online: Nov 15, 2004
Published in print: Dec 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.