Impacts of Design/Information Technology on Project Outcomes
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 130, Issue 4
Abstract
This paper describes a collaborative effort by industry, government, and academia to evaluate the use of design/information technology (D/IT) and to relate the degree of use to project performance. A detailed statistical analysis of 297 projects in the Construction Industry Institute database is used to produce baseline measures of performance and D/IT use. The relationship between these measures is used to assess the economic value of using the technologies. A set of projects that excelled in the use of D/IT and that scored high on performance measures is then examined. These exemplary projects provide a basis for further in-depth analyses through on-site interviews with key project representatives. The results of this study establish that projects benefit from D/IT use. Both owners and contractors can expect construction cost savings of approximately 4% by increasing the use of D/IT. For owners there is clear evidence of schedule compression as well. Although the statistical analyses do not support schedule compression benefits for contractors, findings from the on-site interviews provide anecdotal support.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Back, W. E., and Moreau, K. A.(2000). “Cost and schedule impacts of information management on EPC process.” J. Manage. Eng., 16(2), 59–70.
Chapman, R. E. (2000). “Benefits and costs of research: A case study of construction systems integration and automation technologies in industrial facilities.” NISTIR 6501, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Md.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (1998). “Benchmarking and metrics data report for 1997.” BMM97-2 (Feb.), The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (1999). “Benchmarking and metrics data report for 1998.” BMM98-2 (Apr.), The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (2000a). “Benchmarking and metrics 2000 safety report.” BMM2000-4 (Sep.), The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (2000b). “Benchmarking and metrics data report for 2000.” BMM2000-2 (Aug.), The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
Keen, P. W. (1991). Shaping the future, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Lee, S. (2001). “Discriminant function analysis for categorization of best practices.” PhD dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
Lucas, Jr., H. C., and Weill, P.(1993). “The strategic investment.” J. Business Strategy,, 14, 46–51.
Miyatake, Y., and Kangari, R.(1993). “Experiencing computer integrated construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 119(2), 307–322.
Sethi, V., and King, W. R.(1994). “Development of measures to assess the extent to which an information technology application provides competitive advantage.” Manage. Sci., 40(12), 1601–1618.
Simmons, P.(1994). “Measurement and the evaluation of I.T. investments.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 41, 74–83.
Spencer, J. D. (1999). “Lessons learned in the use of design/information technology in the non-residential construction industry.” Master’s thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
Thomas, S. R. (1999). “Impacts of design/information technology on project outcomes.” NIST GCR 99-786, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Md.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 24, 2002
Accepted: Feb 24, 2003
Published online: Jul 15, 2004
Published in print: Aug 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.