Developing a Draft Schedule Using Templates and Rules
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 127, Issue 5
Abstract
The effort required for the initial drafting of a plan is often a real barrier to developing a useful and high quality schedule for a construction project. The goal of this paper is to demonstrate how an expert system with an editable rule base can be combined with standard templates of modifiable, predefined knowledge within a project management system in order to generate draft schedules based on limited user input. The user can capitalize on past experience by creating a template for each recurring project type. The knowledge contained in the templates is broken down into a physical view (i.e., what is being built), a process view (i.e., how it will be built), and rules for scaling the templates and computing durations based on user input. The physical view is a hierarchical breakdown structure of components that describes (without quantifying) the physical and spatial characteristics of the project type. The process view contains a list of typical activities and the logic relationships that describe their sequencing. The rules serve to link and then expand the two views in order to generate a draft schedule for the project-at-hand once its scale is specified. The feasibility and capabilities of the proposed approach are demonstrated in the context of a full-sized project composed of three buildings.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Chevallier, N. ( 1998). “Automated draft plan and schedule generation using templates, physical breakdown structures and expert systems.” MASc thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
2.
Chevallier, N., and Russell, A. D. ( 1998). “Automated schedule generation.” Can. J. Civ. Engrg., Ottawa, 25(6), 1059–1077.
3.
Dzeng, R.-J., and Tommelein, I. D. ( 1995). “Case-based scheduling using product models.” Proc., 2nd Congr. on Comp. in Civ. Engrg., Vol. 1, ASCE, New York, 163–170.
4.
Faris, R. K. ( 1991). “The role of scheduling in computer integrated construction.” Proc., Constr. Congr. '91 on Preparing for Constr. in the 21st Century, ASCE, N.Y., 295–299.
5.
Fischer, M. A., and Aalami, F. (1996). “Scheduling with computer-interpretable construction method models.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 122(4), 337–347.
6.
Luger, G. F., and Stubblefield, W. A. ( 1989). Artificial intelligence and the design of expert systems, Benjamin/Cummings, Redwood City, Calif.
7.
Russell, A. D., and Chevallier, N. ( 1998). “Representing a project's physical view in support of project management functions.” Can. J. Civ. Engrg., Ottawa, 25(4), 705–717.
8.
Russell, A. D., and Wong, W. C. M. (1993). “New generation of planning structures.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., 119(2), 196–214.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: Jun 23, 1999
Published online: Oct 1, 2001
Published in print: Oct 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.