Customer Satisfaction in Home Building
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 127, Issue 1
Abstract
To successfully compete in the long term, a company must be sure current customers are satisfied. Providing superior quality and keeping customers satisfied are rapidly becoming the ways companies differentiate themselves from competitors. This study examines empirically home builders' performance as measured by the degree of home buyers' satisfaction. Sixteen Florida-based home builders agreed to participate in the study and to allow contact with their recent home buyers. Nearly 300 of these home buyers provided valuable input to the study. A model was proposed, describing home-buyer satisfaction as a three-dimensional composite of satisfaction with house design, house quality, and service. All three dimensions were found to be significant predictors of overall home-buyer satisfaction. Service emerged as the most important component in shaping the overall satisfaction. However, service was the area in which home builders demonstrated the poorest performance. The study results suggest that service deserves the most attention. It can have a far-reaching positive influence on home-buyer satisfaction.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C., and Lehmann, D. R. ( 1994). “Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability: Findings from Sweden.” J. Marketing, 58(July), 53–66.
2.
Barsky, J., and Labagh, R. ( 1992). “A strategy for customer satisfaction.” The Cornell H.R.A. Quarterly, Oct., 32–40.
3.
Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., and Hunter, J. S. ( 1978). Statistics for experimenters: An introduction to design, data analysis, and model building, Wiley, New York.
4.
Brown, J. R., and Fern, E. F. ( 1981). “Goods vs. service marketing: A divergent perspective.” Marketing of services, J. H. Donnelly and W. R. George, eds., American Marketing Association, Chicago, 205–212.
5.
Eccles, R. G. ( 1991). “The performance measurement manifesto.” Harvard Business Rev., Jan.-Feb., 31–137.
6.
Eccles, R. G., and Pyburn, P. J. ( 1992). “Creating a comprehensive system to measure performance.” Mgmt. Accounting, Oct., 41–44.
7.
Hempel, D. J. ( 1977). “Consumer satisfaction with the home buying process: Conceptualization and measurement.” Conceptualization and measurement of consumer satisfaction and dissatisfaction, K. H. Hunt, ed., Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, Mass.
8.
Johnson, M. D., and Fornell, C. ( 1991). “A framework for comparing customer satisfaction across individuals and product categories.” J. Economic Psychology, 12, 267–286.
9.
Maloney, W. F. (1990). “Framework for analysis of performance.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 116(3), 399–415.
10.
Nunnally, J. C. ( 1978). Psychometric theory, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
11.
Builder, July, 60–64.
12.
Sanvido, V. E. (1988). “Conceptual construction process model.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 114(2), 294–312.
13.
SPSS 7.5. (1997). SPSS, Chicago.
14.
Swan, J. E., and Combs, L. J. ( 1976). “Product performance and consumer satisfaction: A new concept.” J. Marketing, 40(Apr.), 25–33.
15.
Florida Trend, Mar., 84–85.
16.
Torbica, Z. M., and Stroh, C. R. ( 2000). “HOMBSAT—An instrument for measuring home-buyer satisfaction.” Quality Mgmt. J., 7(4), in press.
17.
U.S. Department of Commerce. ( 1999). C30/99-12, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 127 • Issue 1 • February 2001
Pages: 82 - 86
History
Received: Jul 16, 1999
Published online: Feb 1, 2001
Published in print: Feb 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.