Project Characteristics for Successful Public-Sector Design-Build
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 123, Issue 1
Abstract
The use of design-build project procurement is rapidly increasing in the public sector. Documented design-build success and imminent changes in federal procurement law are indicators of continued large-scale growth in the public sector. Rapid growth, combined with a lack of long-term experience among many public agencies, necessitates continued investigation of the underlying principles of design-build. Understanding which project characteristics are critical for success is fundamental for improved public agency implementation. To this end, a comprehensive research study was conducted on public-sector selection of design-build. This paper discusses results from a survey of 88 public-sector design-build personnel and structured interviews of federal agency representatives. Five primary project characteristics are discussed: well-defined scope, shared understanding of scope, owner construction sophistication, adequate owner staffing, and established budget. These suggest selection of design-build as an appropriate delivery strategy for successful project completion. Additionally, this paper addresses public-sector criteria of success; these include: staying on budget, conforming to user's expectations, and staying on schedule.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
ASCE Task Committee on Design-Build. (1992). “Design-build in the federal sector.” ASCE, New York, N.Y.
2.
Ashley, D. B., Lurie, C. S., and Jaselskis, E. J.(1987). “Determinants of construction project success.”Proj. Mgmt. J., 18(2), 69–77.
3.
Cushman, R. F., and Taub, K. S. (1992). Design-build contracting handbook. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
4.
de Wit, A. (1986). “Measuring project success: an illusion.”Proc., Proj. Mgmt. Inst., Montreal, Canada, 13–21.
5.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (1995). “Use of the design/build concept on federal-aid projects.”Rep., Transp. Res. Board, Washington, D.C.
6.
Gordon, C. M.(1992). “Choosing appropriate construction contracting method.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 120(1), 196–210.
7.
McManamy, R.(1994). “Design goes back to the future.”ENR, 233(1), 26–28.
8.
Miller, G. A.(1956). “The magic number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.”Psychological Rev., 63(2), 81–97.
9.
Ndekugri, I., and Turner, A.(1994). “Building procurement by design and build approach.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 120(2), 243–256.
10.
O'Connor, J. T., and Vickroy, C. G. (1985). “Control of construction project scope.”Rep. Prepared for Constr. Industry Inst., Univ. of Texas, Austin, Tex.
11.
Oppenheim, A. N. (1966). Questionnaire design and attitude measurement. Basic Books, Inc., New York, N.Y.
12.
Pinto, J., and Slevin, D.(1988). “Project success: definitions and measurement techniques.”Proj. Mgmt. J., 19(1), 67–72.
13.
Potter, K. J., and Sanvido, V. E.(1994). “Design-build prequalification system.”Engrg. in Mgmt., 10(2), 48–56.
14.
Quality in the Constructed Project. (1988). ASCE, New York, N.Y.
15.
Rosenbaum, D. B.(1995). “Can't we all just get along?”ENR, 235(16), 13.
16.
Saaty, T. L. (1990a). Multicriteria decision making: the analytical hierarchy process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, Pa.
17.
Saaty, T. L. (1990b). Decision making for leaders: the analytical hierarchy process for decision in a complex world. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, Pa.
18.
Sanvido, V. E., Grobler, F., Parfitt, K., and Guvenis, M.(1992). “Critical success factors for construction projects.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 118(1), 94–111.
19.
Songer, A. D., and Ibbs, C. W.(1995). “Managing request for proposal development in public sector design-build.”J. Constr. Procurement, 1(1), 64–80.
20.
Songer, A. D., Ibbs, C. W., and Napier, T. R.(1994). “Process model for public sector design-build planning.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 120(4), 857–874.
21.
Spaulding, V. M. (1988). “Newport design/build—a study on integrating the newport design/build strategy into the NAVFACENGCOM facilities design and acquisition process.”Rep., Naval Facilities Engrg. Command, Alexandria, Va.
22.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (1994). “Design-build instructions (DBI) for military construction.”Rep., Directorate of Military Programs, Washington, D.C.
23.
Yates, J. K.(1995). “Use of design/build in the E/C industry.”J. Mgmt. in Engrg., ASCE, 11(6), 33–39.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 123 • Issue 1 • March 1997
Pages: 34 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1997
Published in print: Mar 1997
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.