Automation and Robotics Opportunities: Construction versus Manufacturing
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 120, Issue 2
Abstract
Automation and robots are frequently mentioned as solutions to industrywide problems of increasing costs, declining productivity, skilled‐labor short‐ages, safety, and quality control. Despite numerous attempts to develop automation and robotics for construction field operations, few practical applications can be found on construction sites today. The promises of robotics remain unfulfilled, and attempts to transfer automation technology from manufacturing have not been optimal. Identification of opportunities for automation requires analysis of construction work at the appropriate level. This paper presents a hierarchical taxonomy that divides construction field operations into several levels. The basic‐task level is the appropriate level for construction automation. The paper presents a set of basic tasks that describe construction field work. Construction is compared to highly repetitive manufacturing operations to gain insight into the relationships among product design, process design, and fabrication. In manufacturing, product and process design are closely interrelated. In construction, process design is completely separate from product design, but is intimately related to fabrication. Until construction product and process design become more highly integrated, automation must occur at the basic‐task level. Advances in construction automation will continue to be characterized by a machine performing physically intensive basic tasks, operated by a human craftsperson performing the information‐intensive basic tasks.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Chaffin, D. B., and Andersson, G. B. J. (1991). Occupational biomechanics. J. Wiley, New York, N.Y.
2.
Construction Specifications Institute. (1988). MASTERFORMAT—master list of titles and numbers for the construction industry. Alexandria, Va.
3.
Demsetz, L. A. (1989) “Task identification for construction automation.” Proc., 6th Int. Symp. on Automation and Robotics in Constr., Construction Industry Inst., Austin, Tex., 95–102.
4.
Everett, J. G. (1990). “Back to basics in construction automation.” Proc., 7th Int. Symp. on Automation and Robotics in Constr., Bristol Polytechnic, Bristol, England, 583–590.
5.
Everett, J. G. (1991). “Construction automation: basic task selection, and development of the CRANIUM.” PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
6.
Frankel, E. G. (1990). Project management in engineering services and development. Butterworths, London, England.
7.
Gilbreth, F. B., and Gilbreth, L. (1977). “Classifying the elements of work.” Management classics, M. T. Matteson and J. M. Inancevich, Goodyear Publishing Co., Santa Monica, Calif.
8.
Halpin, D. W., and Woodhead, R. W. (1976). Design of construction and process operations. J. Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
9.
Kangari, R., and Halpin, D. W. (1989). “Potential robotics utilization in construction.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 115(1), 126–143.
10.
Koskela, L. (1992). Process improvement and automation in construction: Opposing or complementing approaches?, Proc., 9th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Japan Industrial Robot Assoc., Tokyo, 105–112.
11.
Maynard, H. B., Stegemerten, G. J., and Schwab, J. L. (1948). Methods‐time measurement. McGraw‐Hill, New York, N.Y.
12.
Normile, D. (1993). “Building‐by‐numbers in Japan.” ENR, 230(9), 22–24.
13.
Porter, M. E., and Millar, V. E. (1985). “How information gives you competitive advantage.” Harvard Business Rev., 63(4), 149–160.
14.
Skibniewski, M. J., and Wooldridge, S. (1992). “Robotics material handling for automated building construction technology.” Automation in Constr., 1(3), 251–266.
15.
Taylor, F. W. (1947). Scientific management. Harper and Brothers, New York, N.Y.
16.
Tucker, R. (1988). “High payoff areas for automation applications.” Proc., 5th Int. Symp. on Robotics in Constr., Japan Industrial Robot Assoc., Tokyo, 9–16.
17.
Tucker, R. L., Peterson, C., Meyer, J., and Simonson, T. (1990). “A methodology for identifying automation potential in industrial construction,” Source document 56. Construction Industry Institute, Austin, Tex.
18.
Warszawski, A. (1990). Industrialization and robotics in building. Harper and Row, New York, N.Y.
19.
Warszawski, A., and Sangrey, D. A. (1985). “Robotics in building construction.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 111(3), 260–280.
20.
Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., and Roos, D. (1990). The machine that changed the world. Rawson Assoc., New York, N.Y.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 120 • Issue 2 • June 1994
Pages: 443 - 452
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 24, 1993
Published online: Jun 1, 1994
Published in print: Jun 1994
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.