Potential Applications of Geographic Information Systems to Construction Industry
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 119, Issue 1
Abstract
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are one of the fastest growing computer‐based technologies of the 1990s, yet, their full potential in the construction industry has not been realized. This technology provides adequate capabilities for solving problems that involve the integration and analysis of large volumes of spatial and descriptive data from a variety of sources. This technology supports the interaction of multiple participants such that they can approach problems in a more comprehensive and systematic way. The primary objectives of this paper are to describe GIS technology and explore potential construction applications that can benefit from the implementation of this technology. An example application of this technology to contractor prequalification is provided. One benefit expected from the application of GIS to contractor prequalification is the creation of a comprehensive data base. This data base can provide a wide range of construction users with a mechanism for rapid retrieval and manipulation capability to satisfy their need of spatial and descriptive information required in the process. Practical considerations regarding GIS application to the construction industry are also addressed. Finally, several research areas worthy of further investigation are noted.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Adams, T. M. et al. (1992). “Integrating the facility delivery process through spatial information.” J. Urban Plng. and Dev., ASCE, 118(1) 13–23.
2.
Aronoff, S. (1989). Geographic information systems: A management perspective. WDL Publications, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
3.
Burrough, P. A. (1986). Principles of geographical information systems for land resources assessment, Clarendon, Oxford, England.
4.
Calkins, H. W., and Tomlinson, R. F. (1977). “Geographic information systems methods and equipment for land use planning.” Int. Geograph. Union Comm. on Geograph. Data Sens. and Process., (USGS), Reston, Va.
5.
Choi, K. C., and Ibbs, C. W. (1990). “CAD/CAE in construction trends, problems, and needs.” J. Mgmt. Engrg., ASCE, 6(4), 349–415.
6.
Cowen, D. J. (1988). “GIS vs. CAD vs. DBMS: What are the differences.” Photogrammetric Engrg. and Remote Sensing, 54(11), 1551–1555.
7.
GIS markets and opportunities. (1989). Daratech, Inc., Cambridge, Mass.
8.
Dueker, K. J., and Kjerne, D. (1989). “Multipurpose cadastre: Terms and definitions.” Proc., Annual Convention of ACSM‐ASPRS, ACSM, 5, 94–103.
9.
Fenves, S. J. et al. (1988). “An integrated software environment for building design and construction.” Proc., Comp. in Civ. Engrg., Microcomp. to Super Comp., Kenneth M. Will, ed., ASCE, 21–32.
10.
Foster, D., Hollingshead, M., Johnson, B., Kinzy, S., Purcell, K., and Tudos, J. (1989). Life cycle solution for infrastructure management, McDonnell Douglas, St. Louis, Mo.
11.
Goodchild, M. F. (1987). “A spatial analytical perspective on GIS.” Int. J. GIS, 1(4), 327–334.
12.
Grobler, F., Kim, S., and Boyer, L. T. (1989). “Symbolic unified project representation (SUPR) model: An environment for automation construction.” Proc., 6th Int. Symp. on Autom. and Rob. in Constr., 545–552.
13.
Jeljeli, M. N. (1991). “Potential applications of GIS to construction industry.” MS thesis, Univ. of Wisconsin at Madison, Madison, Wis.
14.
Keirouz, W., Rehak, D., and Oppenheim, I. (1988). “Issues in domain modeling of constucted facilities.” 5th Int. Symp. on Rob. in Constr., 341–350.
15.
Marble, D. F. (1984). “GIS: An overview.” Proc., Pecora 9 Conf., 18–24.
16.
Meyer, H. W. (1991). “Computer integrated model of activity and data systems for the AEC industry.” PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin at Madison, Madison, Wis.
17.
Paulson, B. C., Chua, L. H., and Froese, T. (1989). “Simulating the knowledge environment for autonomous construction robot agents.” Proc., 6th Int. Symp. on Autom. and Rob. in Constr., 475–482.
18.
Reinschmidt, K. F. et al. (1989). “Integrated database for engineering and construction.” Comp. in Engrg. Practice, Thomas O. Barnwell, ed., ASCE, 539–539.
19.
Russell, J. S., and Skibniewski, M. J. (1988). “Decision criteria in contractor prequalification.” J. Mgmt. Engrg., ASCE, 4(2), 148–164.
20.
Russell, J. S., and Skibniewski, M. J. (1990). “Qualifier‐1: A contractor prequalification model.” J. of Computing in Civ. Engrg., ASCE, 4(1), 77–90.
21.
Russell, J. S. et al. (1990). “Qualifier‐2: A knowledge‐based system for contractor prequalification.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt. ASCE, 116(1), 157–171.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 119 • Issue 1 • March 1993
Pages: 72 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 27, 1992
Published online: Mar 1, 1993
Published in print: Mar 1993
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.