Free access
ENGINEERING YOUR FUTURE
Sep 15, 2011

It’s Concrete, Not Cement!

Publication: Leadership and Management in Engineering
Volume 11, Issue 4
What do best-selling author Dan Brown, well-known NBC newscaster Brian Williams, and Pulitzer Prize–winning novelist Harper Lee have in common? They all have incorrectly referred to concrete as cement. In his most recent novel, The Lost Symbol, Dan Brown makes this error at least 12 times—I tired and stopped counting. Brian Williams, while standing in front of and reporting about an important wall in the Middle East, said it was constructed of cement, while it was obviously made of concrete.
Regardless of its ultimate place within a structure or facility, concrete is created by combining cement with aggregate (sand, gravel, rock) and water. Therefore, cement is just one component of concrete. Cement and water produce a paste that coats the aggregate and sand. As the paste hardens, it binds the aggregate and sand, resulting in concrete. The cement serves as the binding agent; it is the “glue” within the concrete.

So What?

So why all the fuss? Why the concern? Simply, we should strive to speak and write accurately. Communication or, more precisely, miscommunication can frustrate the achievement of objectives. As observed elsewhere in this issue, writer Mark Twain noted that the difference between the right word and the almost right word is “the difference between lightning and the lightning bug.”
Careless word usage also causes interpersonal problems and difficult behavior and generates strife within and among various groups, communities, and nations. Clumsy writing and speaking confuse, offend, hurt feelings, discourage supporters, and create adversaries. As Rabbi Joseph Telushkin stated, “Chances are the worst pains you have suffered in life come from words used cruelly.”
By the way, I am not talking about or advocating being politically correct. Frankly, I am not good at that approach. This column simply advocates using words correctly for the sake of communicating.

Some Modest Suggestions

Effective communication, whether spoken or written, begins with accurate word usage, as in calling concrete concrete and not cement. Effective communication also includes empathetic listening, an understanding of the topic, respect for others and their views, and a positive outlook. While effective communication has many elements, its glue is accurate use of words—understanding what others mean and enabling them to understand your message. Keep that traditional or web-based dictionary handy as you read and listen, and have it and your thesaurus available as you write and prepare presentations.
The next time you begin a project or start work with a new team, define your terms. If one of your deliverables will be a report, draft the glossary early on. I once was a member of an ad hoc team charged with addressing various aspects of “the practice of civil engineering at the professional level.” Immediately, the discussion bogged down because of different views of the meaning of “the practice of civil engineering at the professional level.” Therefore, the group stepped back and focused on defining what that meant and decided it meant “earning an engineering license.” Simple, in retrospect. Recently I started a creativity and innovation project and soon discovered that while I and many others are all for creativity and/or innovation, our understandings of the two words either are vague or vary widely from person to person. Accordingly, I needed to define creativity and innovation and provide examples of each early on if I wanted to communicate with others.
Finally, let’s recognize that as we struggle, especially when writing, to find the right word or to define our terms, we are in effect thinking more deeply and widely about our topic. Conscientious writing disciplines our thinking, as noted by the playwright Edward Albee, who said, “I write to find out what I am thinking.” A few years ago, I was rummaging through old books at a garage sale and thought I saw a book titled Learning to Write. On reaching for it, I realized it was titled Writing to Learn. I suggest that we write to find out what we think and know. William Zinsser, the author of Writing to Learn, said, “Writing enables us to find out what we know—and don’t know—about whatever we’re trying to learn.” Select a topic and start researching and writing about it. Do it long enough and in a disciplined manner, and you will become an expert on the topic.

Biographies

Stuart G. Walesh is an engineering, management, and leadership consultant. He can be reached at [email protected], or visit his website at www.helpingyouengineeryourfuture.com/index.htm

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Leadership and Management in Engineering
Leadership and Management in Engineering
Volume 11Issue 4October 2011
Pages: 340 - 341

History

Received: Jun 28, 2011
Accepted: Jun 28, 2011
Published online: Sep 15, 2011
Published in print: Oct 1, 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Stuart G. Walesh, Ph.D., Dist.M.ASCE
P.E.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share