Free access
ERRATA
Nov 15, 2011

Erratum for “Productivity Scheduling Method: Linear Schedule Analysis with Singularity Functions” by Gunnar Lucko

You are viewing the correction.
VIEW THE CORRECTED ARTICLE
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 137, Issue 12
The following corrections should be noted for errors resulting from omission of analogous buffer equations and consequent shortening of the paper. The writer apologizes for any confusion that this may have caused. On page 250, the differences of the intercepts for Eqs. (17) - (21) should use the intercepts of y(x)={0,8,13,21.9,30.7,38.7} for activities {A,B,C,D,E,F}, per Table 2, and should be corrected as shown in the following section to subtract the buffer equations of predecessors from activity equations of successors.

Difference Equations for Time Buffers

y(x)B-bufABT=(8-1)·x-00-350·x-01
(17)
y(x)C-bufBBT=(13-9)·x-00+(635-450)·x-01+(-635+115)·x-351
(18)
y(x)D-bufCBT=(21.9-14.9)·x-00+(750-635)·x-01+11105·x-351
(19)
y(x)E-bufDBT=(30.7-23.7)·x-00+(130-750)·x-01+(-130+420)·x-301
(20)
y(x)F-bufEBT=(38.7-33.7)·x-00+(340-130)·x-01-16·x-301+(-340+310)·x-401
(21)
The corrected differences of the intercepts are {7,4,7,7,5}. These difference equations describe the white trapezoidal areas in Fig. 5. See also Fig. 6, in which they appear as white triangles after consolidation. All subsequent equations in the paper remain correct; the erroneous differences of the intercepts become zero in the following differentiation to find the minima of the trapezoids.

Difference Equations for Amount Buffers

The following equations are correct but are rewritten in a longer form to simplify verification. These difference equations describe a figure analogous to Fig. 5 but for amount buffers. See also Fig. 7, in which these differences appear as white triangles after consolidation. Note that here the activity equations of Eqs. (5)–(10) and their amount buffer equations are alternatingly stacked, with slightly different intercepts of y(x)={0,7,11,18,25,30} for activities {A,B,C,D,E,F}, per Table 3. This results from the “plateau” of the amount buffers, which constitutes their maximum value for stacking and is different from the time buffers
y(x)B-bufABA=(7-1.75)·x-00+(450-750)·x-01-(-750+0)·x-37.51
(22)
y(x)C-bufBBA=(11-8)·x-00+(635-450)·x-01+(-635+115)·x-351-(-450+0)·x-37.51
(23)
y(x)D-bufCBA={18-[11+(635·957)]}·x-00+(750-635)·x-01-(-635+115)·x-(35-957)1-(-115+0)·x-(50-957)1
(24)
y(x)E-bufDBA=(25-19.8)·x-00+(130-750)·x-01+(-130+420)·x-301-(-750+0)·x-(50-907)1
(25)
y(x)F-bufEBA={30-[25+(130·703)]}·x-00+(340-130)·x-01-(-130+420)·x-(30-703)1-(-420+0)·x-(50-703)1+(-340+310)·x-401
(26)

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 137Issue 12December 2011
Pages: 1210

History

Received: Feb 25, 2011
Accepted: Jun 13, 2011
Published online: Nov 15, 2011
Published in print: Dec 1, 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Gunnar Lucko, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Catholic Univ. of America, Washington, DC 20064. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share