Free access
Research Article
Mar 27, 2020

Hindcasting Loss and Evaluating Implications of Track Location for the 2011 Joplin, Missouri Tornado

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
Volume 6, Issue 2

Abstract

The direct physical loss from a tornado is one possible factor in considering resilience goals for a community. Estimating such loss has historically been achieved either through analysis of empirical data from historical events meant to then match future hypothetical events or through a cost analysis based on a building's damage state. These approaches provide a solid baseline for estimating loss from wind events; however, gathering data from historical events may assume all locations are the same, while analyses based solely on the building damage state may not include a building's contents. This study builds on work previously established in determining loss from building damage state fragilities, by including a loss to the building's interior (including contents) based on Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA's) HAZUS equations. The approach laid out in this paper is then validated, showing what is deemed an acceptable level of accuracy, using the May 22, 2011 Joplin tornado that devastated the local community. Once validated, the same tornado path is relocated in different directions, ultimately crossing most of city of Joplin in four additional hypothetical scenarios. The results of both hindcasting the 2011 Joplin tornado and its hypothetical track variations show commercial (nonresidential) type buildings as key in contributing to the direct physical loss of a wind event. Ultimately, this provides decision makers with a point of consideration when evaluating their community's resilience goals. This article is available in the ASME Digital Collection at https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4046326.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
Volume 6Issue 2June 2020

History

Received: Nov 9, 2018
Revision received: Jan 10, 2020
Published online: Mar 27, 2020
Published in print: Jun 1, 2020

Authors

Affiliations

Stephanie F. Pilkington [email protected]
Department of Engineering Technology and Construction Management, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28203 e-mail: [email protected]
Hussam Mahmoud [email protected]
Professor Structural Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 e-mail: [email protected]
John W. van de Lindt [email protected]
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Center of Excellence for Risk-Based Community Resilience Planning, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 e-mail: [email protected]
Maria Koliou [email protected]
Zachry Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 e-mail: [email protected]
Steve Smith [email protected]
Professor Department of Social Sciences, Missouri Southern State University, Joplin, MO 64801 e-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share