Technical Papers
Jun 18, 2024

A Simplified Approach for Dynamic Analysis of Suspension Bridges under Extreme Limit State

Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 29, Issue 4

Abstract

The design of suspension bridges predominantly emphasizes wind and earthquake loads, frequently overlooking the consideration of extreme events in the design stage, thus posing a threat to bridge safety. The purpose of this research is to spread awareness among engineers for identifying weak zones in a bridge and to provide a new insight into how much damaging the blast loading could be for the long-span suspension bridges if not designed properly under the blast loads. The current dynamic analysis procedures for bridges under blast loads are complex and computationally expensive, making them unsuitable, especially for long-span bridges. To address this, a simplified dynamic analysis approach is proposed to assess the structural response and extreme limit state of suspension bridges exposed to blast loads. The method involves a bilayer solution: blast loading is modeled as nodal loads, and the structural aspect is represented by a three-dimensional (3D) fishbone skeleton finite-element (FE) model. Time-history simulations of blast loads are conducted for various bridge locations and explosive sizes. The parametric dynamic analysis reveals that the tower top node is the most vulnerable location in the suspension bridge under blast loads, which potentially exceeds the stress limits of nearby main cable elements and triggers the zipper-type progressive failure of the entire suspension bridge. Similarly, blasting at the deck nodes nearby tower on the main span side as well as on the side span side significantly amplifies axial stresses in nearby suspenders and the main cable, i.e., demand-to-capacity ratios of C18 and C19 surpass unity under BS4-6W and BS4-8W, respectively confirming that the failure state has reached for C18 and C19 under medium- to large-sized explosives. Therefore, it is recommended that the maximum demand-to-capacity ratio for all bridge components under medium- to large-sized explosives shall be kept below 0.8 to ensure the safety of the entire structure under extreme limit state.

Practical Applications

This paper provides a methodology to investigate the structural redundancy of suspension bridges under extreme limit state by providing a bilayer solution: the blast aspect, which is simulated as nodal loads on the bridge road surface and the structural aspect, is simulated as a 3D fishbone skeleton FE model. The implicit dynamic analysis approach is adopted parametrically by considering variable explosive weights and locations. For each blast scenario, the time-history of nodal loads is applied to various locations of the bridge considering small- to large-sized blasts. From a practical viewpoint, this study is relevant to develop comprehensive understanding of the dynamic behavior exhibited by long-span bridges when subjected to extreme loading scenarios. In essence, the aim is to explore the benefits and applicability of this research to the design of long-span bridges under blast loading conditions. The simplified approach presented in this paper, along with the corresponding bridge response results, allows a bridge design engineer to analyze a suspension bridge effortlessly. This method eliminates the need for intricate computations required to assess blast pressure over a solid bridge model, enabling a straightforward visualization of the anticipated behavior under blast loading. The research serves a crucial role in checking and verifying the extreme limit state, in addition to assessing the serviceability and ultimate limit states according to AASHTO’s requirements. For existing suspension bridges, the study proves beneficial in formulating a comprehensive blast-resistant plan through retrofitting and strengthening identified weak zones. Consequently, this research holds practical significance, serving as a foundation for further exploration and investigation into the effects of blast loading on various types of long-span bridges.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

AASHTO. 2012. AASHTO LRFD 2012 Bridge design specifications. 6th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Ali, K. 2022. “New mathematical formulation of nonlinear unsteady wind loads on long-span bridge decks under nonstationary winds using time-delay neural network.” J. Struct. Eng. 148 (10): 06022003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003476.
Ali, K., A. Javed, A. E. Mustafa, and A. Saleem. 2022. “Blast-loading effects on structural redundancy of long-span suspension bridge using a simplified approach.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 27 (3): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000699.
Ali, K., H. Katsuchi, and H. Yamada. 2018. “Parametric study on cable safety of cable-stayed bridge considering ultimate and fatigue limit states.” J. Struct. Eng. 64 (Mar): 99–108. https://doi.org/10.11532/structcivil.64A.99.
Ali, K., H. Katsuchi, and H. Yamada. 2020. “Numerical simulation of buffeting response of long-span bridges in time-domain using Volterra based wind load model.” J. Struct. Eng. 66 (Dec): 292–302. https://doi.org/10.11532/structcivil.66A.292.
Ali, K., H. Katsuchi, and H. Yamada. 2021a. “Comparative study on structural redundancy of cable-stayed and extradosed bridges through safety assessment of their stay cables.” Engineering 7 (1): 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2020.07.021.
Ali, K., H. Katsuchi, and H. Yamada. 2021b. “Development of nonlinear framework for simulation of typhoon-induced buffeting response of long-span bridges using Volterra series.” Eng. Struct. 244 (Oct): 112721. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2021.112721.
Anwarul Islam, A. K. M., and N. Yazdani. 2008. “Performance of AASHTO girder bridges under blast loading.” Eng. Struct. 30 (7): 1922–1937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.12.014.
Arafa, I. T., O. M. Elhosseiny, and M. T. Nawar. 2022. “Damage assessment of perforated steel beams subjected to blast loading.” Structures 40 (Dec): 646–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.04.051.
Erdik, A., S. A. Kilic, N. Kilic, and S. Bedir. 2016. “Numerical simulation of armored vehicles subjected to undercarriage landmine blasts.” Shock Waves 26 (4): 449–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-015-0576-1.
Farahmand-Tabar, S., M. Barghian, and M. Vahabzadeh. 2019. “Investigation of the progressive collapse in a suspension bridge under the explosive load.” Int. J. Steel Struct. 19 (6): 2039–2050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-019-00263-x.
Gan, L., Z. Zong, H. Qian, and J. Lin. 2022. “Experimental and numerical study of damage mechanism of steel box girders under external blast loads.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 198 (Nov): 107578. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCSR.2022.107578.
Gholipour, G., C. Zhang, and A. A. Mousavi. 2019. “Loading rate effects on the responses of simply supported RC beams subjected to the combination of impact and blast loads.” Eng. Struct. 201 (Dec): 109837. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2019.109837.
Goel, M. D., and V. A. Matsagar. 2014. “Blast-resistant design of structures.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 19 (2): 04014007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000188.
Gongyi, X., M. Weiqi, L. Runze, Z. Chengdong, Z. Xiaoyong, Z. Jie, and S. Lijun. 2022. “The innovations of Yangsigang Yangtze river bridge.” Struct. Eng. Int. 32 (4): 465–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168664.2021.1904805.
Hao, H., and E. K. C. Tang. 2010. “Numerical simulation of a cable-stayed bridge response to blast loads, Part II: Damage prediction and FRP strengthening.” Eng. Struct. 32 (10): 3193–3205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.06.006.
Hashemi, S. K., M. A. Bradford, and H. R. Valipour. 2016. “Dynamic response of cable-stayed bridge under blast load.” Eng. Struct. 127 (Dec): 719–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.08.038.
Hashemi, S. K., H. R. Valipour, and M. A. Bradford. 2021. “Effect of the traffic load distribution on the progressive collapse of a cable-stayed bridge under blast load.” Int. J. Steel Struct. 21 (6): 1937–1952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-021-00544-4.
Ibarhim, A., H. Salim, and N. A. Rahman. 2012. “Progressive collapse of post-tensioned box girder bridges under blast loads using applied element method.” In Proc., Structures Congress 2012, 2291–2300. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Jenkins, B. M. 2001. Protecting public surface transportation against terrorism and serious crime: Continuing research on best security practices. San Jose, CA: Mineta Transportation Institute Publications.
JIS (Japan Industrial Standard). 2013. Wire ropes. Tokyo: JIS.
JRA (Japan Road Association). 2002. Specifications for highway bridges. Tokyo: JRA.
JRA (Japan Road Association). 2017. Specifications for highway bridges [In Japanese.] Tokyo: JRA.
JSCE (Japan Society of Civil Engineers). 2007. Standard specifications for steel for and composite structures. Tokyo: JSCE.
Karlos, V., G. Solomos, and M. Larcher. 2016. “Analysis of the blast wave decay coefficient using the Kingery–Bulmash data.” Int. J. Prot. Struct. 7 (3): 409–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041419616659572.
Kitagawa, M. 2004. “Technology of the Akashi Kaikyo bridge.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 11 (2): 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.31.
Lee, J., K. Choi, and C. Chung. 2020. “Numerical analysis-based blast resistance performance assessment of cable-stayed bridge components subjected to blast loads.” Appl. Sci. 10 (23): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10238511.
Lin, J., Z. Zong, L. Gan, and M. Li. 2022. “Dynamic response and damage mechanism of parallel wire cables under contact explosion.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 195 (Dec): 107350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107350.
Mazurkiewicz, Ł., J. Małachowski, P. Baranowski, and K. Damaziak. 2013. “Comparison of numerical testing methods in terms of impulse loading applied to structural elements.” J. Theor. Appl. Mech. 51 (Dec): 615–625.
McDowall, A. 2012. “At least 23 killed in Riyadh fuel truck blast.” Accessed February 12, 2023. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSBRE8A00BU/.
Michaltsos, G. T., and D. S. Sophianopoulos. 2021. “Suspension bridges under blast loads: A preliminary linearized approach.” Arch. Appl. Mech. 91 (9): 4011–4038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-021-01991-5.
Miyata, T., and K. Yamaguchi. 1993. “Aerodynamics of wind effects on the Akashi Kaikyo bridge.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 48 (2–3): 287–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(93)90142-B.
Mladjov, R. V. 2020. “Cable- stayed bridges: Development, achievements, and possibilities.” Structure Magazine, October 1, 2020.
Mozos, C. M., and A. C. Aparicio. 2010a. “Parametric study on the dynamic response of cable stayed bridges to the sudden failure of a stay, Part I: Bending moment acting on the deck.” Eng. Struct. 32 (10): 3288–3300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.07.003.
Mozos, C. M., and A. C. Aparicio. 2010b. “Parametric study on the dynamic response of cable stayed bridges to the sudden failure of a stay, Part II: Bending moment acting on the pylons and stress on the stays.” Eng. Struct. 32 (10): 3301–3312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.07.002.
Mudragada, R., and S. S. Mishra. 2021. “Effect of blast loading and resulting progressive failure of a cable-stayed bridge.” SN Appl. Sci. 3 (Mar): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04145-y.
Mustafa, A. E., A. Javed, and K. Ali. 2022. “Safety assessment of cables of suspension bridge under blast load.” In Proc., Structures Congress 2022, 79–93. Reston, VA: ASCE.
NBC (National Broadcasting Company) Universal. 2007. “Suicide truck bomb collapses Baghdad bridge.” NBC News, April 10, 2007.
Oki, Y., N. Ibaraki, M. Kaiso, and M. Koichi. 1999. “Development of 200  kgf/mm2 grade high-strength zinc-galvanized wire.” Res. Dev. KOBE 49 (2): 8–11.
Orton, S. L., V. P. Chiarito, J. K. Minor, and T. G. Coleman. 2014. “Experimental testing of CFRP-strengthened reinforced concrete slab elements loaded by close-in blast.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (2): 04013060. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000821.
Othman, H., and H. Marzouk. 2016. “Strain rate sensitivity of fiber-reinforced cementitious composites.” ACI Mater. J. 113 (2): 143–150. https://doi.org/10.14359/51688461.
Pan, Y., B. Y. B. Chan, and M. M. S. Cheung. 2013. “Blast loading effects on an RC slab-on-girder bridge superstructure using the multi-Euler domain method.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (11): 1152–1163. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000457.
Pan, Y., C. E. Ventura, and M. M. S. Cheung. 2017. “Performance of highway bridges subjected to blast loads.” Eng. Struct. 151 (Dec): 788–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.08.028.
Roberts, J., J. Kulicki, D. Beranek, and J. Englot. 2003. Recommendations for bridge and tunnel security. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Sgambi, L., B. Dupont, and E. Garavaglia. 2022. “Preliminary analyses for the study of the effects of an explosive action on a long-span suspension bridge.” In Proc., IABSE Congress Nanjing 2022-Bridges and Structures: Connection, Integration and Harmonisation, 1609–1616. Zurich, Switzerland: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering.
Smith, M. 2009. ABAQUS/standard user’s manual, version 6.9. Providence, RI: Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp.
Son, J., and A. Astaneh-Asl. 2009. “Blast protection of cable-stayed and suspension bridges.” In TCLEE 2009: Lifeline earthquake engineering in a Multihazard environment, 1–12. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/41050(357)68.
Tang, E. K. C., and H. Hao. 2010. “Numerical simulation of a cable-stayed bridge response to blast loads, Part I: Model development and response calculations.” Eng. Struct. 32 (10): 3180–3192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.06.007.
Tetougueni, C. D., and P. Zampieri. 2019. “Structural response of cable-stayed bridge subjected to blast load.” Procedia Struct. Integrity 18 (Dec): 765–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2019.08.225.
Tetougueni, C. D., P. Zampieri, and C. Pellegrino. 2020. “Structural performance of a steel cable-stayed bridge under blast loading considering different stay patterns.” Eng. Struct. 219 (Sep): 110739. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2020.110739.
Thomas, M. 2022. “Crimea Bridge: Russia ramps up security after blast.” Accessed February 12, 2023. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-63189627.
UFC (Unified Facility Criteria). 2002. “Design and analysis of hardened structures to conventional weapons effects.” US Joint Departments of the Army, Navy, and Air Force. Accessed December 2, 2023. https://www.wbdg.org/ffc/dod/unified-facilities-criteria-ufc/ufc-3-340-01.
Williams, G., C. Holland, E. B. Williamson, O. Bayrak, K. A. Marchand, and J. Ray. 2010. Blast-resistant highway bridges: Design and detailing guidelines. Billerica, MA: WIT Press.
Wu, H., Y. L. Peng, and Q. Fang. 2020. “Experimental and numerical study of ultra-high performance cementitious composites filled steel tube (UHPCC-FST) subjected to close-range explosion.” Int. J. Impact Eng. 141 (Jul): 103569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103569.
Xu, F. Y., M. J. Zhang, L. Wang, and J. R. Zhang. 2016. “Recent highway bridge collapses in China: Review and discussion.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30 (5): 04016030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000884.
Yang, S., Z. Liu, S. Wang, W. Zhong, R. Zhang, and X. Yao. 2023. “Dynamic response and failure analysis for urban bridges under far-field blast loads.” Eng. Struct. 285 (Dec): 116043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116043.
Yang, Y., X. Wang, and Z. Wu. 2020. “Long-span cable-stayed bridge with hybrid arrangement of FRP cables.” Compos. Struct. 237 (Apr):111966. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2020.111966.
Zhu, Z., Y. Li, and C. Ma. 2021. “Damage analysis of small box girder bridges under car explosion.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 120 (Feb): 105104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.105104.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 29Issue 4November 2024

History

Received: Dec 5, 2023
Accepted: Mar 27, 2024
Published online: Jun 18, 2024
Published in print: Nov 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Nov 18, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Khawaja Ali, Ph.D.
Bridge/Structural Engineer, Transport Development Div., CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd., Tokyo 136-0071, Japan.
Aleena Saleem, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Researcher, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Yokohama National Univ., Yokohama 240-8501, Japan.
Postdoctoral Associate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Florida International Univ., Miami, FL 33174 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1782-5845. Email: [email protected]
Bushra Khadim
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Engineering & Technology Lahore, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.
Ajibola Ibrahim Quadri, Ph.D.
Lecturer, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Federal Univ. of Technology, Akure P.M.B. 704, Nigeria.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share