Case Studies
Apr 27, 2024

A Case Study on the Seismic Evaluation of a Low-Rise Existing RC Building in Northeast India

Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 29, Issue 3

Abstract

This study aimed to conduct a finite element analysis-based seismic evaluation of an existing reinforced concrete (RC) building for a high seismic zone in northeast India. The building model was evaluated for demands using response spectrum analysis (RSA) per the latest Indian standards. Data on the condition of existing material strength, geometry, and initial design are collected on site. Here, a procedure has been introduced to evaluate the seismic demand and capacity of structural members, for prioritizing strengthening work. The focus of the study was on assessing the potential failure of columns, with an aim to evaluate a building’s susceptibility to failure and collapse. This evaluation procedure was applied to an existing low-rise RC building in northeastern India that was originally designed for gravity loads. The building had significant plan irregularities and stiffness irregularities. As anticipated, it was observed that the building did not withstand seismic design action, and all the columns failed, while the beams failed partially. For various load combinations, the demand–capacity ratio, particularly in terms of axial load and biaxial bending moments of the columns, emerged as a critical force-based factor in evaluating the building’s safety under combined forces. The obtained results were validated on site by visual inspection of structural longitudinal cracks under high combined (axial with biaxial moment) demand in columns. The case study identified the six most critical columns that might lead to building collapse and need immediate strengthening. This approach demonstrated its feasibility as a tool for assessing the seismic performance of existing low-rise RC buildings for prioritizing structural strengthening work.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The first author sincerely acknowledges the student scholarship funding received from the Ministry of Education, Government of India. The second author sincerely thank his colleague, Mr. Sharvil Alex Faroz, CEO, IRM for valuable discussions on seismic evaluation and retrofitting of structures. All the authors sincerely acknowledge the anonymous editors and reviewers for helping to enhance the quality of the manuscript.

References

ASCE. 2014. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. ASCE/SEI 41-13. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2017. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. ASCE/SEI 41-17. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Belmouden, Y., and P. Lestuzzi. 2009. “An equivalent frame model for seismic analysis of masonry and reinforced concrete buildings.” Constr. Build. Mater. 23 (1): 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.10.023.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 1987. Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for building and structure. BIS 875 (Part 2). New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 1989. Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures. BIS 875 (Part 1). New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2000. Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete. BIS 456. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2016. Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, Part 1: General provisions and buildings. New Delhi, India: BIS.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2005. Design of structures for earthquake resistance: Part 1. Eurocode 8. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Chiu, C.-K., H.-F. Sung, and T.-C. Chiou. 2022. “Post-earthquake preliminary seismic assessment method for low-rise RC buildings in Taiwan.” J. Build. Eng. 46 (Apr): 103709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103709.
Choong, K. Y. 2020. “Factors influencing in situ strength of existing concrete structure estimated by core test and NDTs.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 25 (1): 04019033. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000459.
Dalal, J. S., H. B. Seed, and D-L. Wu. 1977. “Site-dependent seismic response spectra for soft sites.” J. Power Div. 103 (1). https://doi.org/10.1061/JPWEAM.0000841.
Debnath, P., L. Halder, and S. C. Dutta. 2022. “Damage survey and seismic vulnerability assessment of unreinforced masonry structures in low-intensity Ambasa earthquake of northeast India.” Structures 44 (Oct): 372–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.08.005.
Demartinos, K., and S. Dritsos. 2006. “First-level pre-earthquake assessment of buildings using fuzzy logic.” Earthquake Spectra 22 (4): 865–885. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2358176.
Doğan, T. P., T. Kızılkula, M. Mohammadi, İ. H. Erkan, H. T. Kabaş, and M. H. Arslan. 2021. “A comparative study on the rapid seismic evaluation methods of reinforced concrete buildings.” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 56 (Apr): 102143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102143.
El-Betar, S. A. 2018. “Seismic vulnerability evaluation of existing RC buildings.” HBRC J. 14 (2): 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2016.09.002.
FEMA. 1998a. Handbook for the seismic evaluation of buildings—A pre-standard. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 1998b. Handbook for the seismic evaluation of buildings—A prestandard federal emergency management agency. FEMA 310. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2002. Rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic hazards. A handbook federal emergency management agency. FEMA 154. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2017. Rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic hazards: A handbook. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Formisano, A., R. Landolfo, F. M. Mazzolani, and G. Florio. 2010. “A quick methodology for seismic vulnerability assessment of historical masonry aggregates.” In Proc., COST Action C26 Final Conf. on Urban Habitat Constructions Under Catastrophic Events, 16–18. Chair, Naples: Federico M. Mazzolani.
Ghodke, S., A. Singh, S. Dutta, N. Debnath, and A. Bagchi. 2022. “Studies of seismic deficiency due to local design and construction practices in India: A case study with an existing RC building.” In Proc., SHMII-11: 11th Int. Conf. on Structural Health Monitoring of Intelligent Infrastructure. Montreal, QC, Canada: Concordia Univ.
Gondaliya, K., V. Bhaiya, S. Vasanwala, and A. Desai. 2022. “Probabilistic seismic vulnerability of Indian code-compliant RC frame.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 27 (3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000708.
GSA (General Services Administration). 2003. Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects. Washington, DC: GSA.
Hait, P., A. Sil, and S. Choudhury. 2021. “Modified damage assessment method for reinforced concrete buildings.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 26 (4): 04021039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000605.
Halder, L., S. C. Dutta, and R. P. Sharma. 2020. “Damage study and seismic vulnerability assessment of existing masonry buildings in Northeast India.” J. Build. Eng. 29 (May): 101190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101190.
Hassan, A. F., and M. Sozen. 1997. “Seismic vulnerability assessment of low-rise buildings in regions with infrequent earthquakes.” ACI Struct. J. 94 (1): 31–39.
Inel, M., H. B. Ozmen, and E. Akyol. 2013. “Observations on the building damages after 19 May 2011 Simav (Turkey) earthquake.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 11 (1): 255–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9414-3.
Jain, S. K., K. Mitra, M. Kumar, and M. Shah. 2010. “A proposed rapid visual screening procedure for seismic evaluation of RC-frame buildings in India.” Earthquake Spectra 26 (3): 709–729. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3456711.
Kappos, A. J., and G. G. Penelis. 2014. Earthquake resistant concrete structures. London: CRC Press.
Kassem, M. M., F. M. Nazri, and E. N. Farsangi. 2020. “The seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies: A state-of-the-art review.” Ain Shams Eng. J. 11 (4): 849–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.04.001.
Lang, K., and H. Bachmann. 2003. “On the seismic vulnerability of existing unreinforced masonry buildings.” J. Earthquake Eng. 7 (3): 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460309350456.
Lourenço, P. B., and J. A. Roque. 2006. “Simplified indexes for the seismic vulnerability of ancient masonry buildings.” Constr. Build. Mater. 20 (4): 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.027.
Luca, F. D., G. M. Verderame, and G. Manfredi. 2015. “Analytical versus observational fragilities: The case of Pettino (L’Aquila) damage data database.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 13 (4): 1161–1181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9658-1.
Lynn, A. C., J. P. Moehle, S. A. Mahin, and W. T. Holmes. 1996. “Seismic evaluation of existing reinforced concrete building columns.” Earthquake Spectra 12 (4): 715–739. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585907.
Martino, G. D., M. D. Ludovico, A. Prota, C. Moroni, G. Manfredi, and M. Dolce. 2017. “Estimation of repair costs for RC and masonry residential buildings based on damage data collected by post-earthquake visual inspection.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 15 (4): 1681–1706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0039-9.
Mazumder, R. K., S. Rana, and A. M. Salman. 2021. “First level seismic risk assessment of old unreinforced masonry (URM) using fuzzy synthetic evaluation.” J. Build. Eng. 44 (Dec): 103162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103162.
Mosoarca, M., I. Onescu, E. Onescu, and A. Anastasiadis. 2020. “Seismic vulnerability assessment methodology for historic masonry buildings in the near-field areas.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 115 (Sep): 104662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104662.
Nyunn, S., F. Wang, J. Yang, Q. F. Liu, I. Azim, and S. Bhatta. 2020. “Numerical studies on the progressive collapse resistance of multi-story RC buildings with and without exterior masonry walls.” Structures 28 (Dec): 1050–1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.07.049.
Ozmen, H. B., and M. Inel. 2017. “Effect of rapid screening parameters on seismic performance of RC buildings.” Struct. Eng. Mech. 62 (4): 391–399. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.62.4.391.
Puranam, A. Y., A. Irfanoglu, S. Pujol, T. C. Chiou, and S. J. Hwang. 2019. “Evaluation of seismic vulnerability screening indices using data from the Taiwan Earthquake of 6 February 2016.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 17 (4): 1963–1981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0519-1.
Roy, G., M. K. Sen, A. Singh, S. Dutta, and S. Choudhury. 2024. “Probabilistic seismic risk assessment of a reinforced concrete building considering hazard level and the resulting vulnerability using Bayesian Belief Network.” Asian J. Civ. Eng. 25 (3): 2993–3009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00958-x.
Scawthorn, C., and G. S. Johnson. 2000. “Preliminary report: Kocaeli (Izmit) earthquake of 17 August 1999.” Eng. Struct. 22 (7): 727–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00106-6.
Sezen, H., A. S. Whittaker, K. J. Elwood, and K. M. Mosalam. 2003. “Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the August 17, 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey earthquake, and seismic design and construction practise in Turkey.” Eng. Struct. 25 (1): 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00121-9.
Singh, A., S. Dutta, and N. Debnath. 2024. “Seismic vulnerability assessment and strengthening prioritization of deficient reinforced concrete columns: A case study in Northeast India.” In NDRAMM: Int. Conf. on Natural Disaster: Risk Analysis, Management and Mitigation. Assam, India: National Institute of Technology.
Tekeli, H., H. Dilmac, F. Demir, M. Gencoglu, and K. Guler. 2017. “Shear stress indicator to predict seismic performance of residential RC buildings.” Comput. Concr. 19 (3): 283–291. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2017.19.3.283.
Thingbaijam, K. K. S., S. K. Nath, A. Yadav, A. Raj, M. Y. Walling, and W. K. Mohanty. 2008. “Recent seismicity in Northeast India and its adjoining region.” J. Seismolog. 12 (1): 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-007-9074-y.
Weng, Y. H., K. Qian, F. Fu, and Q. Fang. 2020. “Numerical investigation on load redistribution capacity of flat slab substructures to resist progressive collapse.” J. Build. Eng. 29 (May): 101109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101109.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 29Issue 3August 2024

History

Received: Sep 20, 2023
Accepted: Jan 30, 2024
Published online: Apr 27, 2024
Published in print: Aug 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Sep 27, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Silchar, Silchar, Assam 788010, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3702-5939. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Silchar, Silchar, Assam 788010, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8877-0840. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Nirmalendu Debnath [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Silchar, Silchar, Assam 788010, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share