Technical Papers
Jun 5, 2023

Convex Programming-Based Robust Optimization Procedure for Blast-Excited Structures with Bounded Uncertainty

Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 28, Issue 3

Abstract

Application of the robust optimization (RO) technique to ensure the least possible deviation of structural performance is gaining increasing attention in recent years. However, most RO studies have been conducted in the probabilistic domain, where sufficient uncertainty information is available to construct probability distribution functions of response parameters. But, in many cases, such as for structures under underground blast excitation, hazard parameters like charge weight and charge center distance do not have any definite probability density function. Only their ranges of variations are known to an engineer. Hence, it is more logical to model these parameters as uncertain-but-bounded (UBB) type, which requires only bounds of variations to characterize the uncertainty. The available RO studies in the UBB-domain mainly deal with static loads. Studies on time-variant dynamic loads, such as blast load, are scarce in the existing literature. Also, blast load time-histories show record-to-record variations in their signatures, even with the same setup of hazard parameters. This aspect cannot be considered by the conventional convex programming approaches of RO in the UBB domain. To address all these issues, a new RO procedure is proposed in the present study, which is based on the dual response surface method. The proposed RO procedure can transform the complex simulation-based RO procedure under dynamic blast load to an equivalent deterministic problem with explicit constraints. Thereby, the RO can be easily solved by a gradient-based optimizer. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is elucidated by the complex real-world problems of a multistory building and an underground reinforced concrete bunker. The results are compared with conventional RO approaches. The results show that the proposed approach consistently yields more economic as well as robust solutions in a computationally efficient way.

Practical Applications

This research provides a computationally efficient and easy means to yield economic and robust design solutions of structures subjected to stochastic underground blast excitation. The obtained solutions are robust, as these are least affected due to various sources of parameter uncertainty. The proposed approach is valid even for cases where no statistical distribution of input parameters is available. The efficiency of the proposed approach is tested for a multistory building and a reinforced concrete (RC) bunker, which are practical and complex structures. Material nonlinearity and soil–structure interaction have been considered. The proposed approach uses conventional easy industrial software SAP2000 and Matlab. The method, being generic in nature, can be applied for any form of load application, any type of structure, and any material and analysis type. The charts have been developed for the 20-story building and RC bunker, from which one can work out a budget and risk of explosion for an anticipated explosive charge weight, and charge center distance from the structure.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. This may include software models and codes used.

References

Au, F. T. K., Y. S. Cheng, L. G. Tham, and G. W. Zeng. 2003. “Robust design of structures using convex models.” Comput. Struct. 81 (28–29): 2611–2619. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(03)00322-5.
Ben-Tal, A., and A. Nemirovski. 1998. “Robust convex optimization.” Math. Oper. Res. 23 (4): 769–805. https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.23.4.769.
Bhattacharjya, S., S. Banerjee, and G. Datta. 2018. “Efficient robust design optimization of rail bridge hollow pier considering uncertain but bounded type parameters in metamodeling framework.” Asian J. Civ. Eng. 19 (6): 679–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-018-0058-8.
Bhattacharjya, S., G. Datta, and H. G. Suryadutta Aravapally. 2022. “Robust design optimization of concrete circular underground pipes considering seismic effects.” ASCE J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 13 (2): 05022003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000648.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2000. Plain and reinforced concrete: Code of practice. IS 456, 2000. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2009. Code of practice concrete structures for storage of liquids. IS 3370-2, 2009. New Delhi, India: BIS.
Chakraborty, S., and S. Bhattacharjya. 2011. “Robust optimization of structures subjected to stochastic earthquake with limited information on system parameter uncertainty.” Eng. Optim. 43 (12): 1311–1330. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2011.554545.
Chen, X., J. Fan, and X. Bian. 2017. “Structural robust optimization design based on convex model.” Results Phys. 7 (Jan): 3068–3077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2017.08.013.
Cheng, J., W. Lu, Z. Liu, D. Wu, W. Gao, and J. Tan. 2021a. “Robust optimization of engineering structures involving hybrid probabilistic and interval uncertainties.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 63 (3): 1327–1349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02762-6.
Cheng, J., Y. Qian, Z. Liu, Y. Feng, Z. Zhou, and J. Tan. 2019. “Heterogeneous-objective robust optimization of complex mechatronic components considering interval uncertainties.” IEEE Access 7 (Jan): 20538–20552. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2894774.
Cheng, R., W. Chen, H. Hao, and J. Li. 2021b. “A state-of-the-art review of road tunnel subjected to blast loads.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 112 (Jun): 103911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.103911.
Cheng, X., Y. Zhou, C. Bao, and J. Ma. 2017. “Dynamic response of RC frame structures under the action of mining blasting.” Open Civ. Eng. J. 11 (1): 699–713. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874149501711010699.
Clough, R., and J. Penzien. 1995. Dynamics of structures. Berkeley, CA: Computers & Structures.
Datta, G., S. Bhattavharjya, and S. Chakraborty. 2021. “A metamodelling-based robust optimisation approach for structures subjected to random underground blast excitation.” Structures 33: 3615–3632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.06.062.
Erkmen, B. 2021. “Evaluation of seismic design provisions for a drift and inter-story drift relationship.” Earthquake Resistant Eng. Struct. 152 (Sep): 21–32. https://doi.org/10.2495/ERES150021.
Eslami, M., P. K. MirzaMohammadi, S. H. Khalilpour, H. Parsa, and V. Kodure. 2022. “Experimental and numerical investigation of blast wave attenuation by using barriers in different configurations and shapes.” J. Struct. Eng. 149 (1): 04022224. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-11408.
Fang, K. T., X. Lu, Y. Tang, and J. X. Yin. 2004. “Constructions of uniform designs by using resolvable packings and coverings.” Discrete Math. 274 (1–3): 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-365X(03)00100-6.
FEMA. 2000. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA 356. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Hacıefendioğlu, K., and E. Alpaslan. 2014. “Stochastically simulated blast-induced ground motion effects on nonlinear response of an industrial masonry chimney.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 28 (2): 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-013-0761-7.
Hashemi, A. S., and P. Katsabanis. 2021. “Tunnel face preconditioning using destress blasting in deep underground excavations.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 117 (Jun): 104126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.104126.
IS (Indian Standards). 1987. Indian Standard Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures: Part 2 imposed loads (second revision). IS 875 (Part 2)-1987. New Delhi, India: Bureau of Indian Standards.
Jennings, P. C., and G. W. Housner. 1969 “Simulated earthquake motion for design purpose.” In Proc., 4th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 145–160. Santiago de Chile, Chile: Universidad de Chile.
Jeremić, R., and Z. Bajić. 2006. “An approach to determining the TNT equivalent of high explosives.” Sci. Tech. Rev. LVI (1): 58–62.
Khuri, A. I., and S. Mukhopadhyay. 2010. “Response surface methodology.” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 2 (2): 128–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.73.
Lee, K. H., and G. J. Park. 2001. “Robust optimization considering tolerances of design variables.” Comput. Struct. 79 (1): 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(00)00117-6.
Lin, B. C., I. G. Tadjbakhsh, and A. S. Papageorgiou. 1989. “Response of base-isolated buildings to random excitations described by the Clough-Penzien Spectral model.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 18 (1): 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290180106.
Meng, Z., H. Hu, and H. Zhou. 2018. “Super parametric convex model and its application for non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization.” Appl. Math. Modell. 55 (Feb): 354–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2017.11.001.
Qi, S., G. Huang, X. Zhi, F. Fan, and R. G. J. Flay. 2021. “External blast load factors for dome structures based on reliability.” Def. Technol. 18 (2): 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2021.01.004.
Qi, S., X. Zhi, F. Fan, and R. G. J. Flay. 2020. “Probabilistic blast load model for domes under external surface burst explosions.” Struct. Saf. 87 (Nov): 102004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.102004.
Ramamrutham, S. 2013. Design of reinforced concrete structures. 17th ed. New Delhi, India: Dhanpat Rai Publishing Company.
Sochet, I. 2010 “Blast effects of external explosions.” In Proc., 8th Int. Symp. on Hazards, Prevention, and Mitigation of Industrial Explosions. Geneva: HAL Open Science.
Stochino, F. 2016. “RC beams under blast load: Reliability and sensitivity analysis.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 66 (Aug): 544–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.05.003.
UFC (Unified Facilities Criteria). 2002. Design and analysis of hardened structures to conventional weapons effects. UFC 3-340-01. Washington, DC: UFC.
UFC (Unified Facilities Criteria). 2008. Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions. UFC 3-340-02. Washington, DC: UFC.
Wu, C., and H. Hao. 2007. “Safe scaled distance for masonry infilled RC frame structures subjected to air blast loads.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 21 (6): 422–431. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2007)21:6(422).
Wu, J., Z. Luo, N. Zhang, and Y. Zhang. 2015. “A new interval uncertain optimization method for structures using Chebyshev surrogate models.” Comput. Struct. 146 (Aug): 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.09.006.
Yang, Y., C. Zhang, G. Bramerdorfer, N. Bianchi, J. Qu, J. Zhao, and S. Zhang. 2022. “A computationally efficient surrogate model based robust optimization for permanent magnet synchronous machines.” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 37 (3): 1520–1532. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.2021.3140096.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 28Issue 3August 2023

History

Received: Nov 22, 2022
Accepted: Mar 24, 2023
Published online: Jun 5, 2023
Published in print: Aug 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Nov 5, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, Howrah, West Bengal 711103, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4891-9190. Email: [email protected]
Anirban Akhuli [email protected]
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, Howrah, West Bengal 711103, India. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, Howrah, West Bengal 711103, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2080-0788. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share