Technical Papers
Dec 19, 2022

Applying the Continuous Hidden Markov Model to Structural State Estimation

Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 28, Issue 2

Abstract

Assessing large structures on the basis of multivariate static data sets is a challenging task for a number of reasons. One is that a low-frequency sample does not consistently capture longitudinal discrepancies in the data and thus cannot translate multivariate information into structural conditions and performance metrics. Another is the fluctuation in the data due to the synergy between loading and environmental factors. The precise elimination of these factors is difficult and can lead to inaccuracies in a structural condition assessment. In this study, an advanced machine learning framework employing the Continuous Hidden Markov Model (CHMM) is proposed to address this challenge using multivariate static data flows. Trained CHMMs are used to determine the probabilistic states of given degrees of freedom (e.g., a member or element within the structure) with respect to the input data. To build reliable training sets, two key factors need to be accounted for: (1) the numerical modeling errors inherent in training data, and (2) the sensitivity of the data to localized damage (e.g., the decrement of stiffness in a component). To handle Factor (1), an inversion-based regime is adopted to account for modeling errors by modifying the global (finite element) stiffness matrix. For Factor (2), the use of amplifying functions effectively increases the distinguishability of data and CHMMs to state changes. The efficacy of the CHMM-based framework is numerically demonstrated on a simple support beam and then on a cable-stayed bridge section. In both cases, the results demonstrate that the proposed method can capture the damage location and detect damage extent when the noise is below an acceptable level.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some models and code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. These may include simulation data and code used to generate models used in this work.

Acknowledgments

LL, IH, KP, and DS would like to acknowledge the support of the Department of Civil and Structural Engineering at the University of Sheffield.

References

Atha, D. J., and M. R. Jahanshahi. 2018. “Evaluation of deep learning approaches based on convolutional neural networks for corrosion detection.” Struct. Health Monit. 17 (5): 1110–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921717737051.
Baggenstoss, P. M. 2001. “A modified Baum-Welch algorithm for hidden Markov models with multiple observation spaces.” IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Proc. 9 (4): 411–416. https://doi.org/10.1109/89.917686.
Bonnet, M., and A. Constantinescu. 2005. “Inverse problems in elasticity.” Inverse Probl. 21 (2): R1. https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/21/2/R01.
Brownjohn, J. M. 2007. “Structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure.” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 365 (1851): 589–622. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2006.1925.
Casciati, S. 2008. “Stiffness identification and damage localization via differential evolution algorithms.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 15 (3): 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.236.
Cawley, P. 2018. “Structural health monitoring: Closing the gap between research and industrial deployment.” Struct. Health Monit. 17 (5): 1225–1244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921717750047.
Chen, F.-C., and M. R. Jahanshahi. 2017. “NB-CNN: Deep learning-based crack detection using convolutional neural network and naïve Bayes data fusion.” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 65 (5): 4392–4400. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2017.2764844.
Eleftheroglou, N., and T. Loutas. 2016. “Fatigue damage diagnostics and prognostics of composites utilizing structural health monitoring data and stochastic processes.” Struct. Health Monit. 15 (4): 473–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921716646579.
Farrar, C. R., and K. Worden. 2007. “An introduction to structural health monitoring.” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 365 (1851): 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2006.1928.
Farrar, C. R., and K. Worden. 2012. Structural health monitoring: A machine learning perspective. New York: Wiley.
He, X., M. Kawatani, T. Hayashikawa, H. Furuta, and T. Matsumoto. 2011. “A bridge damage detection approach using train-bridge interaction analysis and GA optimization.” Procedia Eng. 14 (2011): 769–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.097.
Jin, C., S. Jang, X. Sun, J. Li, and R. Christenson. 2016. “Damage detection of a highway bridge under severe temperature changes using extended Kalman filter trained neural network.” J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 6 (3): 545–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-016-0173-8.
Ko, J., and Y. Q. Ni. 2005. “Technology developments in structural health monitoring of large-scale bridges.” Eng. Struct. 27 (12): 1715–1725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.02.021.
Kurata, M., J. Kim, J. Lynch, G. Van Der Linden, H. Sedarat, E. Thometz, P. Hipley, and L.-H. Sheng. 2013. “Internet-enabled wireless structural monitoring systems: Development and permanent deployment at the New Carquinez suspension bridge.” J. Struct. Eng. 139 (10): 1688–1702. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000609.
Lam, H. F., and C. T. Ng. 2008. “The selection of pattern features for structural damage detection using an extended Bayesian ANN algorithm.” Eng. Struct. 30 (10): 2762–2770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.03.012.
Lee, S.-H., and J. Song. 2016. “Bayesian-network-based system identification of spatial distribution of structural parameters.” Eng. Struct. 127 (Nov): 260–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.08.029.
Li, S., S. Wei, Y. Bao, and H. Li. 2018. “Condition assessment of cables by pattern recognition of vehicle-induced cable tension ratio.” Eng. Struct. 155 (Jan): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.09.063.
Lipponen, A., J. M. Huttunen, S. Romakkaniemi, H. Kokkola, and V. Kolehmainen. 2018. “Correction of model reduction errors in simulations.” SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 40 (1): B305–B327. https://doi.org/10.1137/15M1052421.
Long, Z., Y. Lu, and B. Dong. 2019. “PDE-NET 2.0: Learning PDEs from data with a numeric-symbolic hybrid deep network.” J. Comput. Phys. 399 (Dec): 108925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2019.108925.
Lynch, J. P., and K. J. Loh. 2006. “A summary review of wireless sensors and sensor networks for structural health monitoring.” Shock Vibr. Dig. 38 (2): 91–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0583102406061499.
Mata, J. 2011. “Interpretation of concrete dam behaviour with artificial neural network and multiple linear regression models.” Eng. Struct. 33 (3): 903–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.011.
Mei, H., S. Yuan, L. Qiu, and J. Zhang. 2016. “Damage evaluation by a guided wave-hidden Markov model based method.” Smart Mater. Struct. 25 (2): 025021. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/25/2/025021.
Mei, Y., and S. Goenezen. 2019. “Quantifying the anisotropic linear elastic behavior of solids.” Int. J. Mech. Sci. 163 (Nov): 105131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105131.
Miao, Q., and V. Makis. 2007. “Condition monitoring and classification of rotating machinery using wavelets and hidden Markov models.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 21 (2): 840–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.01.009.
Mitchell, J. S. 2007. “From vibration measurements to condition-based maintenance.” Sound Vib. 41 (1): 62–79.
Ni, Y., Y. Wang, and C. Zhang. 2020. “A Bayesian approach for condition assessment and damage alarm of bridge expansion joints using long-term structural health monitoring data.” Eng. Struct. 212 (Jun): 110520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110520.
Nissinen, A., L. Heikkinen, and J. Kaipio. 2008. “The Bayesian approximation error approach for electrical impedance tomography–experimental results.” Meas. Sci. Technol. 19 (1): 015501. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/19/1/015501.
Ou, J., and H. Li. 2010. “Structural health monitoring in mainland China: Review and future trends.” Struct. Health Monit. 9 (3): 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921710365269.
Prendergast, L. J., and K. Gavin. 2014. “A review of bridge scour monitoring techniques.” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 6 (2): 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2014.01.007.
Rageh, A., D. G. Linzell, and S. E. Azam. 2018. “Automated, strain-based, output-only bridge damage detection.” J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 8 (5): 833–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-018-0311-6.
Sereda, P., A. Vilanova, and F. A. Gerritsen. 2006. “Automating transfer function design for volume rendering using hierarchical clustering of material boundaries.” In EUROVIS’06: Proc., of the 8th Joint Eurographics/IEEE VGTC Conf. on Visualization, 243–250. New York: IEEE.
Smyl, D., K.-N. Antin, D. Liu, and S. Bossuyt. 2018. “Coupled digital image correlation and quasi-static elasticity imaging of inhomogeneous orthotropic composite structures.” Inverse Probl. 34 (12): 124005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6420/aae793.
Smyl, D., and D. Liu. 2019. “Invisibility and indistinguishability in structural damage tomography.” Meas. Sci. Technol. 31 (2): 024001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ab43f2.
Sohn, H., C. R. Farrar, F. M. Hemez, D. D. Shunk, D. W. Stinemates, B. R. Nadler, and J. J. Czarnecki. 2003. A review of structural health monitoring literature: 1996–2001. Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Wang, Z., T.-H. Yi, D.-H. Yang, H.-N. Li, and H. Liu. 2021. “Eliminating the bridge modal variability induced by thermal effects using localized modeling method.” J. Bridge Eng. 26 (10): 04021073. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001775.
Westgate, R., K.-Y. Koo, and J. Brownjohn. 2015. “Effect of solar radiation on suspension bridge performance.” J. Bridge Eng. 20 (5): 04014077. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000668.
Yu, J. 2017. “Adaptive hidden Markov model-based online learning framework for bearing faulty detection and performance degradation monitoring.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 83 (Jan): 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.06.004.
Yuan, S., J. Zhang, J. Chen, L. Qiu, and W. Yang. 2019. “A uniform initialization Gaussian mixture model–based guided wave–hidden Markov model with stable damage evaluation performance.” Struct. Health Monit. 18 (3): 853–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921718783652.
Zhou, W., D. Chakraborty, N. Kovvali, A. Papandreou-Suppappola, D. Cochran, and A. Chattopadhyay. 2007. “Damage classification for structural health monitoring using time-frequency feature extraction and continuous hidden Markov models.” In Proc., 2007 Conf. Record of the Forty-First Asilomar Conf. on Signals, Systems and Computers, 848–852. New York: IEEE.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 28Issue 2May 2023

History

Received: Mar 14, 2022
Accepted: Oct 4, 2022
Published online: Dec 19, 2022
Published in print: May 1, 2023
Discussion open until: May 19, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Li Lai
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., Hong Kong.
Iman Hajirasouliha
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Structural Engineering, The Univ. of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Structural Engineering, The Univ. of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6672-7665
Xu He
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, China Univ. of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei Province 430074, China.
Danny Smyl, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Coastal, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share