Case Studies
May 3, 2023

Spatial Flood Forecasting Modeling under Lack of Data Using RS and Optimized Support Vector Machine: A Case Study of the Zahedan Watershed

Publication: Natural Hazards Review
Volume 24, Issue 3

Abstract

This research was conducted with the aim of producing flood susceptible area maps of the Zahedan catchment in Iran during lack of data using remote sensing. To determine the factors to be included in the model, factors identified in previous studies were prepared using remote sensing and were evaluated by the information gain ratio (IGR) method and the multicollinearity diagnostic test, and ultimately 10 factors with the highest IGR values were chosen as the most effective factors in the region. The flood inventory map was produced by processing the Sentinel-1 satellite data. The gathered data were used to map flood susceptibility maps with the SVM model optimized with IWO and ACO. The prediction accuracy of the models was evaluated in terms of root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). While both optimization algorithms are effective in improving the performance of SVM, the hybrid of SVM with IWO shows the best performance in terms of statistical measures and Friedman test results. The results of the study confirm the good performance of the proposed models in spatial prediction of flood susceptible areas. Since over half of the urban lands of the city of Zahedan are at moderate to very high risk of flooding, this area needs more attention in terms of flood prevention and control measures.

Practical Applications

Prevention of flood events will not always be practical, so using flood mitigation methods is considered the best strategy for flood risk management. The purpose of using these methods is to significantly reduce flood damage by evaluating flood-prone areas and taking protective measures in areas. In this study, data mining methods were used to select parameters affecting floods in the region. One of the problems of the study area is the lack or absence of information. Considering that there was no complete information about the parameters required in this research in the studied area, information was obtained using remote sensing and then optimization was done using the data obtained by the support vector machine model. The flood sensitivity map of the area was drawn. The flood sensitivity map will help to identify high-risk and low-risk areas for flood prevention planning. The results showed that 9% of the studied area is in very high susceptibility, 3% in high susceptibility, 3% in moderate susceptibility, 7% in low susceptibility and 78% in very low susceptibility. Also, in the meantime, more than half of Zahedan’s urban area is located in the medium to very high sensitivity area, which should be given special attention.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data (satellite images and information extracted from them, model validation data and any data used in this research), models (SVM model and hybrid models), and code (codes of meta-heuristic optimization algorithms) that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Adger, N. W. 2006. “Vulnerability.” Global Environ. Change 16 (3): 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006.
Ahmadlou, M., M. Karimi, S. Alizadeh, A. Shirzadi, D. Parvinnejhad, H. Shahabi, and M. Panahi. 2019. “Flood susceptibility assessment using integration of adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (Anfis) and biogeography-based optimization (Bbo) and bat algorithms (Ba).” Geocarto Int. 34 (11): 1252–1272. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2018.1474276.
Balogun, A., F. Rezaie, Q. B. Pham, L. Gigović, S. Drobnjak, Y. A. Aina, M. Panahi, S. T. Yekeen, and S. Lee. 2021. “Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility in western Aerbia using hybrid support vector regression (Svr) with Gwo, Bat and Coa algorithms.” Geosci. Front. 12 (3): 101104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.10.009.
Chen, Y.-R., C. H. Yeh, and B. Yu. 2011. “Integrated application of the analytic hierarchy process and the geographic information system for flood risk assessment and flood plain management in Taiwan.” Nat. Hazards 59 (3): 1261–1276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9831-7.
Choubin, B., H. Darabi, O. Rahmati, F. Sajedi-Hosseini, and B. Kløve. 2018. “River suspended sediment modelling using the cart model: A comparative study of machine learning techniques.” Sci. Total Environ. 615 (Feb): 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.293.
Choubin, B., E. Moradi, M. Golshan, J. Adamowski, F. Sajedi-Hosseini, and A. Mosavi. 2019. “An ensemble prediction of flood susceptibility using multivariate discriminant analysis, classification and regression trees, and support vector machines.” Sci. Total Environ. 651 (Feb): 2087–2096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.064.
Copernicus Sentinel. 2020. “Copernicus open access hub and sentinel data.” Accessed January 24, 2023. https://scihub.copernicus.eu.
Dai, J., and Q. Xu. 2013. “Attribute selection based on information gain ratio in fuzzy rough set theory with application to tumor classification.” Appl. Soft Comput. 13 (1): 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2012.07.029.
Darabi, H., B. Choubin, O. Rahmati, A. Torabi Haghighi, B. Pradhan, and B. Kløve. 2019. “Urban flood risk mapping using the GARP and quest models: A comparative study of machine learning techniques.” J. Hydrol. 569 (Feb): 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.002.
Das, S., and A. Gupta. 2021. “Multi-criteria decision based geospatial mapping of flood susceptibility and temporal hydro-geomorphic changes in the Subarnarekha basin, India.” Geosci. Front. 12 (5): 101206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101206.
Dodangeh, E., M. Panahi, F. Rezaie, S. Lee, D. Tien Bui, C. W. Lee, and B. Pradhan. 2020. “Novel hybrid intelligence models for flood-susceptibility prediction: Meta optimization of the GMDH and SVR models with the genetic algorithm and harmony search.” J. Hydrol. 590 (Nov): 125423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125423.
Dorigo, M. 1992. “Optimization, learning and natural algorithms.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Computer science, Politecnico di Milano.
Evans, R., C. Horstman, and M. Conzemius. 2021. “Accuracy and optimization of force platform gait analysis in labradors with cranial cruciate disease evaluated at a walking gait.” Vet. Surg. 34 (5): 445–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2005.00067.x.
Fernández, D. S., and M. A. Lutz. 2010. “Urban flood hazard zoning in Tucumán province, argentina, using GIS and multicriteria decision analysis.” Eng. Geol. 111 (1): 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.12.006.
Grillakis, M. G., A. G. Koutroulis, J. Komma, I. K. Tsanis, W. Wagner, and G. Blöschl. 2016. “Initial soil moisture effects on flash flood generation—A comparison between Basins of contrasting hydro-climatic conditions.” J. Hydrol. 541 (Oct): 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.007.
Gupta, A., and S. Srivastava. 2020. “Comparative analysis of ant colony and particle swarm optimization algorithms for distance optimization.” Procedia Comput. Sci. 173 (Jan): 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.06.029.
Hong, H., M. Panahi, A. Shirzadi, T. Ma, J. Liu, A. X. Zhu, W. Chen, I. Kougias, and N. Kazakis. 2018. “Flood susceptibility assessment in Hengfeng area coupling adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with genetic algorithm and differential evolution.” Sci. Total Environ. 621 (Apr): 1124–1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.114.
Jaafari, A., M. Panahi, B. T. Pham, H. Shahabi, D. Tien Bui, F. Rezaie, and S. Lee. 2019. “Meta optimization of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with grey wolf optimizer and biogeography-based optimization algorithms for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility.” Catena 175 (Apr): 430–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.033.
Jacinto, R., N. Grosso, E. Reis, L. Dias, F. D. Santos, and P. Garrett. 2015. “Continental Portuguese Territory Flood Susceptibility Index—Contribution to a vulnerability index.” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 15 (8): 1907–1919. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1907-2015.
Kazakis, N., I. Kougias, and T. Patsialis. 2015. “Assessment of flood hazard areas at a regional scale using an index-based approach and analytical hierarchy process: Application in Rhodope–Evros region, Greece.” Sci. Total Environ. 538 (Dec): 555–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.055.
Khosravi, K., et al. 2019. “A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modeling using multi-criteria decision-making analysis and machine learning methods.” J. Hydrol. 573 (Jun): 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.073.
Khosravi, K., E. Nohani, E. Maroufinia, and H. R. Pourghasemi. 2016. “A GIS-based flood susceptibility assessment and its mapping in Iran: A comparison between frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence bivariate statistical models with multi-criteria decision-making technique.” Nat. Hazards 83 (2): 947–987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2357-2.
Khosravi, K., B. T. Pham, K. Chapi, A. Shirzadi, H. Shahabi, I. Revhaug, I. Prakash, and D. Tien Bui. 2018. “A comparative assessment of decision trees algorithms for flash flood susceptibility modeling at Haraz Watershed, Northern Iran.” Sci. Total Environ. 627 (Jan): 744–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.266.
Kia, M. B., S. Pirasteh, B. Pradhan, A. R. Mahmud, W. N. A. Sulaiman, and A. Moradi. 2012. “An artificial neural network model for flood simulation using Gis: Johor River Basin, Malaysia.” Environ. Earth Sci. 67 (1): 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1504-z.
Lee, S., et al. 2019. “Sevucas: A novel GIS-based machine learning software for seismic vulnerability assessment.” Appl. Sci. 9 (17): 3495. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9173495.
Mahato, S., S. Pal, S. Talukdar, T. Kanti Saha, and P. Mandal. 2021. “Field based index of flood vulnerability (IFV): A new validation technique for flood susceptible models.” Geosci. Front. 12 (5): 101175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101175.
Marjanović, M., M. Kovačević, B. Bajat, and V. Voženílek. 2011. “landslide susceptibility assessment using SVM machine learning algorithm.” Eng. Geol. 123 (3): 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.09.006.
Mehrabian, A. R., and C. Lucas. 2006. “A novel numerical optimization algorithm inspired from weed colonization.” Ecol. Inf. 1 (4): 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2006.07.003.
Mishra, K., and R. Sinha. 2019. “Flood risk assessment in the Kosi Megafan using multi-criteria decision analysis: A hydro-geomorphic approach.” Geomorphology 350: 106861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.106861.
Mohammadi, A., K. Valizadeh Kamran, S. Karimzadeh, H. Shahabi, and N. A. Ansari. 2020. “Flood detection and susceptibility mapping using sentinel-1 time series, alternating decision trees, and bag-adtree models.” Complexity 2020 (Nov): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4271376.
Ostad-Ali-Askari, K., M. Shayannejad, and H. Ghorbanizadeh-Kharazi. 2017. “Artificial neural network for modeling nitrate pollution of groundwater in marginal area of Zayandeh-Rood River, Isfahan, Iran.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 21 (1): 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0572-8.
Panahi, M., E. Dodangeh, F. Rezaie, K. Khosravi, H. Van Le, M. J. Lee, S. Lee, and B. T. Pham. 2021. “Flood spatial prediction modeling using a hybrid of meta-optimization and support vector regression modeling.” Catena 199 (Apr): 105114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.105114.
Pham, B. T., C. Luu, T. V. Phong, H. D. Nguyen, H. Van Le, T. Q. Tran, H. T. Ta, and I. Prakash. 2021. “Flood risk assessment using hybrid artificial intelligence models integrated with multi-criteria decision analysis in Quang Nam Province, Vietnam.” J. Hydrol. 592 (Jan): 125815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125815.
Pham, B. T., D. Tien Bui, H. R. Pourghasemi, P. Indra, and M. B. Dholakia. 2017. “Landslide susceptibility assesssment in the Uttarakhand area (India) using GIS: A comparison study of prediction capability of naïve Bayes, multilayer perceptron neural networks, and functional trees methods.” Theor. Appl. Climatol. 128 (1): 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-015-1702-9.
Pham, B. T., D. Tien Bui, and I. Prakash. 2018. “Bagging based support vector machines for spatial prediction of landslides.” Environ. Earth Sci. 77 (4): 146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7268-y.
Pradhan, B. 2013. “A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS.” Comput. Geosci. 51 (Feb): 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.08.023.
Rahman, M., C. Ningsheng, M. M. Islam, A. Dewan, J. Iqbal, R. Muhammad Ali Washakh, and T. Shufeng. 2019. “Flood susceptibility assessment in Bangladesh using machine learning and multi-criteria decision analysis.” Earth Syst. Environ. 3 (3): 585–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-019-00123-y.
Rahmati, O., H. R. Pourghasemi, and H. Zeinivand. 2016. “Flood susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence models in the Golastan Province, Iran.” Geocarto Int. 31 (1): 42–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2015.1041559.
Rahmati, O., S. Yousefi, Z. Kalantari, E. Uuemaa, T. Teimurian, S. Keesstra, T. D. Pham, and D. Tien Bui. 2019. “Multi-hazard exposure mapping using machine learning techniques: A case study from Iran.” Remote Sens. 11 (16): 1943. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11161943.
Sarkar, D., and P. Mondal. 2020. “Flood vulnerability mapping using frequency ratio (Fr) model: A case study on Kulik River Basin, Indo-Bangladesh Barind region.” Appl. Water Sci. 10 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1102-x.
Solomatine, D., L. M. See, and R. J. Abrahart. 2008. “Data-driven modelling: Concepts, approaches and experiences.” In Practical hydroinformatics: Computational intelligence and technological developments in water applications, edited by R. J. Abrahart, L. M. See, and D. P. Solomatine. Berlin: Springer.
Tehrany, M. S., S. Jones, F. Shabani, F. Martínez-Álvarez, and D. Tien Bui. 2019. “A novel ensemble modeling approach for the spatial prediction of tropical forest fire susceptibility using logitboost machine learning classifier and multi-source geospatial data.” Theor. Appl. Climatol. 137 (1): 637–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2628-9.
Tehrany, M. S., B. Pradhan, and M. Neamah Jebur. 2013. “Spatial prediction of flood susceptible areas using rule based decision tree (Dt) and a novel ensemble bivariate and multivariate statistical models in GIS.” J. Hydrol. 504 (Nov): 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.09.034.
Tehrany, M. S., B. Pradhan, and M. Neamah Jebur. 2014. “Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS.” J. Hydrol. 512 (May): 332–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.008.
Tehrany, M. S., B. Pradhan, and M. Neamah Jebur. 2015. “Flood susceptibility analysis and its verification using a novel ensemble support vector machine and frequency ratio method.” Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 29 (4): 1149–1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1021-9.
Tien Bui, D., et al. 2018. “New hybrids of anfis with several optimization algorithms for flood susceptibility modeling.” Water 10 (9): 1210. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091210.
Tien Bui, D., et al. 2019. “A novel ensemble artificial intelligence approach for gully erosion mapping in a semi-arid watershed (Iran).” Sensors 19 (11): 2444. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19112444.
Tien Bui, D., Q. T. Bui, Q. P. Nguyen, B. Pradhan, H. Nampak, and P. Trong Trinh. 2017. “A hybrid artificial intelligence approach using GIS-based neural-fuzzy inference system and particle swarm optimization for forest fire susceptibility modeling at a tropical area.” Agric. For. Meteorol. 233 (Feb): 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.11.002.
Vertex. 2021. “NASA archive of SAR data.” Accessed August 1, 2021. https://vertex.daac.asf.alaska.edu.
Yalcin, A., S. Reis, A. C. Aydinoglu, and T. Yomralioglu. 2011. “A Gis-based comparative study of frequency ratio, analytical hierarchy process, bivariate statistics and logistics regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Trabzon, Ne Turkey.” Catena 85 (3): 274–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2011.01.014.
Zhao, H. T., Y. Z. Feng, W. Chen, and G. F. Jia. 2019. “Application of invasive weed optimization and least square support vector machine for prediction of beef adulteration with spoiled beef based on visible near-infrared (Vis-Nir) hyperspectral imaging.” Meat Sci. 151 (May): 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.01.010.
Zhou, Y., H. Chen, and G. Zhou. 2014. “Invasive weed optimization algorithm for optimization no-idle flow shop scheduling problem.” Neurocomputing 137 (Aug): 285–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2013.05.063.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Natural Hazards Review
Natural Hazards Review
Volume 24Issue 3August 2023

History

Received: Apr 27, 2022
Accepted: Jan 31, 2023
Published online: May 3, 2023
Published in print: Aug 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Oct 3, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Seyyed Meisam Mirkazemi
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Water Sciences and Engineering, Islamic Azad Univ., Kerman Branch, Kerman 7635168111, Iran.
Navid Jalalkamali [email protected]
Professor Assistant, Dept. of Water Sciences and Engineering, Islamic Azad Univ., Kerman Branch, Kerman 7635168111, Iran (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Mohsen Irandoost
Professor Assistant, Dept. of Water Sciences and Engineering, Islamic Azad Univ., Kerman Branch, Kerman 7635168111, Iran.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share