Abstract

Severe droughts, water-use conflicts, and minimum outflow requirements have caused infeasibilities in modeling large-scale complex hydrothermal systems. This paper presents and discusses a new formulation of objective function and constraints to better represent multiple water uses and deal with infeasibilities in the HIDROTERM model, a nonlinear programming (NLP) model developed to optimize the operation of the Brazilian interconnected hydrothermal system. The system is one of the largest in the world. In the last 10 years, approximately 72% of electricity consumed in Brazil has been supplied by hydropower plants, but with increasing shares from thermal, wind, and, more recently, solar power generation. Because of hydrological changes in recent years and the additional operational constraints imposed by environmental agencies, the use of models for decision making, such as HIDROTERM, frequently encounters the problem of infeasibility. To avoid this problem, a new objective function is proposed in HIDROTERM that incorporates economic penalties when the preset requirements are not met. Based on economic considerations, some hard constraints are removed from the constraint set and added to the objective function as penalty terms. These constraints are tightly linked with multiple water uses, including environmental protection, flood control, consumptive uses, and navigation purposes. The proposed change in the objective function and constraints avoids the problem of infeasibilities and makes it possible to apply the model to extreme conditions. Additionally, this formulation helps identify and minimize the risk, duration, and intensity of unavoidable non-compliance occurrences related to multiple water uses.

Practical Applications

The presented new version of the HIDROTERM model can be used to study and support decision making in the management and operation of large-scale hydrothermal systems. These systems can be formed by a set of hydraulically connected individual hydropower plants and reservoirs, located within a set of electrically connected subsystems. Each subsystem contains demands and other power plants, including thermal, wind, nuclear, and solar plants, and exchanges. The model has been developed with continued improvements since 2008 and applied to large systems such as the Brazilian Interconnected Power System (BIPS) with over 150 reservoirs. A graphical user interface is provided. The objective function is to minimize the total costs of additional thermal dispatch and exchanges, as well as avoid or minimize deficits in energy supply in subsystems, minimum releases, consumptive uses, and minimum storages in reservoirs. The decision variables are the power and nonpower releases for each hydropower plant and the thermal dispatches and exchanges for each subsystem. Some typical applications include (1) monthly planning operation of the system, considering a planning horizon from 3 to 5 years; (2) diagnostic studies about reliability and resilience of existing systems, processing the same system configuration to a set of different hydrological or energy demand scenarios; (3) impact analysis of changes in operational rules and constraints related to multiple uses of water; and (4) planning and evaluation of expansion alternatives. The model can be applied to a complete hydrothermal system or subsets of it, including subsystems, basins, cascades, or a single hydropower plant.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The research reported herein was supported by the Fundação para o Desenvolvimento Tecnológico da Engenharia (FDTE), Companhia Energética de São Paulo (CESP), and Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica (ANEEL), Brazil, under Grant No. PD-0061-0047/2014. Additional supports were provided by the Fundação Centro Tecnológico de Hidráulica (FCTH), Brazil and an AECOM endowment.

References

ANEEL (Brazilian Electricity Regulatory Agency). 2020. “Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica.” Accessed October 20, 2020. http://www.aneel.gov.br.
Barros, M. T. L., F. Tsai, J. E. G. Lopes, and W. Yeh. 2003. “Optimization of large-scale hydropower system operations.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 129 (3): 178–188. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2003)129:3(178).
CCEE (Câmara de Comercialização de Energia Elétrica). 2020. “Câmara de Comercialização de Energia Elétrica.” Accessed July 30, 2020. https://www.ccee.org.br.
CEPEL (Centro de Pesquisas de Energia Elétrica). 2013a. Modelo DECOMP—Determinação da coordenação da operação a curto prazo. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: CEPEL.
CEPEL (Centro de Pesquisas de Energia Elétrica). 2013b. Modelo estratégico de geração hidrotérmica a subsistemas interligados–NEWAVE. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: CEPEL.
Chowdhury, A. F. M. K., T. D. Dang, A. Bagchi, and S. Galelli. 2020. “Expected benefits of Laos’ hydropower development curbed by hydroclimatic variability and limited transmission capacity: Opportunities to reform.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 146 (10): 05020019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001279.
Dias, B. H., A. L. Marcato, R. C. Souza, M. P. Soares, I. C. Silva Junior, E. J. D. Oliveira, and T. P. Ramos. 2010. “Stochastic dynamic programming applied to hydrothermal power systems operation planning based on the convex hull algorithm.” In Mathematical problems in engineering, 390940. London: Hindawi Publishing Corporation. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001279.
GAMS (General Algebraic Modeling System). 2020. “General algebraic modeling system.” Accessed July 30, 2020. http://www.gams.com.
Hossain, M. S., and A. El-Shafie. 2013. “Intelligent systems in optimizing reservoir operation policy: A review.” Water Resour. Manage. 27 (9): 3387–3407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0353-9.
Labadie, J. 2004. “Optimal operation of multireservoir systems: State of art review.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 130 (2): 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:2(93).
Lima, S. C. P., R. C. Zambon, M. T. L. Barros, and W. W. G. Yeh. 2021. “Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Brazilian hydrothermal system.” In Proc., World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2021, 1092–1102. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Lopes, J. E. G., and M. T. L. Barros. 2007. “Modelo de planejamento da operação de sistemas hidrotérmicos de produção de energia elétrica.” Revista Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos 14 (2): 19–32. https://doi.org/10.21168/rbrh.v14n2.p19-32.
Mendes, L. A., M. T. L. Barros, R. C. Zambon, and W. W. G. Yeh. 2015. “Trade-off analysis among multiple water uses in a hydropower system: Case of São Francisco River Basin, Brazil.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 141 (10): 04015014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000527.
Momoh, J. A., M. E. El-Hawary, and R. Adapa. 1999. “A review of selected optimal power flow literature to 1993, Part II: Newton, linear programming and interior point methods.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cyber. 14 (1): 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.744492.
Mousavi, S. J., A. G. Zanoosi, and A. Afshar. 2004. “Optimization and simulation of a multiple reservoir system operation.” J. Water Supply: Res. Technol. 53 (6): 409–424. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2004.0032.
ONS (Operador Nacional do Sistema Elétrico). 2011. Inventário das restrições operativas hidráulicas dos aproveitamentos hidrelétricos. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: ONS.
Pereira, M. V. F., and L. M. V. G. Pinto. 1985. “Stochastic optimization of multireservoir hydroelectric system: A decomposition approach.” Water Resour. Res. 21 (6): 779–792. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR021i006p00779.
Pinto, M. 2019. Energia Eólica: Princípios e operação. São Paulo, Brazil: Érica.
Saadat, M., and K. Asghari. 2019. “Feasibility improved stochastic dynamic programming for optimization of reservoir operation.” Water Resour. Manage. 33 (10): 3485–3498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02315-7.
Souza, R. C., A. L. M. Marcato, B. H. Dias, and F. L. C. Oliveira. 2012. “Optimal operation of hydrothermal systems with hydrological scenario generation through bootstrap and periodic autoregressive models.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 222 (Apr): 606–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.05.020.
Su, Y., J. D. Kern, and G. W. Characklis. 2017. “The impact of wind power growth and hydrological uncertainty on financial losses from oversupply events in hydropower-dominated systems.” Appl. Energy 194 (May): 172–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.067.
Wurbs, R. 1993. “Reservoir-system simulation and optimization models.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 119 (4): 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1993)119:4(455).
Yeh, W. W. G. 1985. “Reservoir management and operations models: A state of art review.” Water Resour. Res. 21 (2): 1797–1818. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR021i012p01797.
Zambon, R. C., M. T. L. Barros, J. E. G. Lopes, P. S. F. Barbosa, A. L. Francato, and W. W. G. Yeh. 2012. “Optimization of large-scale hydrothermal system operation.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 138 (2): 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000149.
Zambon, R. C., M. T. L. Barros, J. E. G. Lopes, A. L. Francato, P. S. F. Barbosa, and W. W. G. Yeh. 2015. “Drought and its economic impacts on the Brazilian interconnected power system.” In Proc., World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, 2101–2110. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Zambon, R. C., M. T. L. Barros, and W. W. G. Yeh. 2016. “Impacts of the 2012-2015 drought on the Brazilian hydropower system.” In Proc., World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, 82–91. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Zambon, R. C., M. T. L. Barros, and W. W. G. Yeh. 2019. “Storage, productivity, and resilience in the Brazilian hydropower system.” In Proc., World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, 82–91. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Zhang, R., J. Zhou, and Y. Wang. 2012. “Multi-objective optimization of hydrothermal energy system considering economic and environmental aspects.” Int. J. Electrical Power Energy Syst. 42 (1): 384–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.03.031.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 150Issue 1January 2024

History

Received: Feb 10, 2023
Accepted: Aug 29, 2023
Published online: Oct 26, 2023
Published in print: Jan 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Mar 26, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Formerly, Graduate Student, Institute of Energy and Environment, Univ. of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP 05508-010, Brazil. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2789-058X. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, Polytechnic School, Univ. of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP 05508-010, Brazil (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4552-6236. Email: [email protected]
Mario Thadeu Leme de Barros, M.ASCE
Deceased July 2, 2021; Professor, Dept. of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, Polytechnic School, Univ. of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP 05508-010, Brazil.
William W.-G. Yeh, Dist.M.ASCE [email protected]
Distinguished Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share