Comparison of AMI and SCADA Systems for Leak Detection and Localization in Water Distribution Networks
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 149, Issue 11
Abstract
Various water distribution leak detection and localization methods have been proposed for supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) data collection systems. However, because their available numbers of measurements are limited, the SCADA systems are often insufficient to identify realistic sized leaks. A clear next step is to develop detection and localization methods for smart systems that collect advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) data (i.e., AMI systems); however, only the authors have proposed tools for the AMI data collection systems. To encourage the usage of AMI data, this study tested five types of data collection systems for leak detection and localization that measure (1) only source flows, (2) source flows and a few nodal pressures, (3) source flows and AMI demands, (4) AMI demands and a few nodal pressures, and (5) AMI pressures and AMI demands. An appropriate leak detection and localization tool for each data collection system is applied and tested for two water distribution networks: one located in Austin, TX, and the other in Tucson, AZ. Each system’s performance was evaluated using metrics of detection probability, false alarm rate, time to detect, and localization pipe distance. Overall, based on the obtained results, the SCADA systems were poor in detecting realistic-sized leaks, while the AMI systems successfully identified those small failures. Thus, the AMI systems were required to improve detection, and a pressure-supplemented AMI system was necessary to obtain high localization performance, particularly for a large network, such as Austin, Texas.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
This material is based in part upon the work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. 1762862. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF. The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their effort. Their comments and suggestions improved the quality of the paper.
References
ASCE. 2021. “Report card for America’s infrastructure.” Accessed February 1, 2023. https://infrastructurereportcard.org/cat-item/drinking-water-infrastructure/.
AWWA (American Water Works Association). 2008. Vol. 36 of Water audits and loss control programs: M36. Denver: AWWA.
Badger Meter. 2022. “Ultrasonic meters for residential applications.” Accessed August 8, 2022. https://www.badgermeter.com/products/meters/ultrasonic-flow-meters/residential-ultrasonic-flow-meters/.
Berglund, A., V. S. Areti, D. Brill, and G. Mahinthakumar. 2017. “Successive linear approximation methods for leak detection in water distribution systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 143 (8): 04017042. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000784.
Blokker, E. J. M. 2010. “Stochastic water demand modelling for a better understanding of hydraulics in water distribution networks.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Water Management, Delft Univ. of Technology.
Britton, T. C., R. A. Stewart, and K. R. O’Halloran. 2013. “Smart metering: Enabler for rapid and effective post meter leakage identification and water loss management.” J. Cleaner Prod. 54 (Sept): 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.018.
City of Madison. 2019. “Project H2O metering system.” Accessed July 25, 2022. https://www.cityofmadison.com/water/sustainability/project-h2o-metering-system.
Daniel, I., J. Pesantez, S. Letzgus, M. A. Khaksar Fasaee, F. Alghamdi, E. Berglund, G. Mahinthakumar, and A. Cominola. 2022. “A sequential pressure-based algorithm for data-driven leakage identification and model-based localization in water distribution networks.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 148 (6): 04022025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001535.
DiCarlo, M. F., and E. Z. Berglund. 2022. “Using advanced metering infrastructure data to evaluate consumer compliance with water advisories during a water service interruption.” Water Res. 221 (Aug): 118802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118802.
Grigg, N. S. 2013. “Water main breaks: Risk assessment and investment strategies.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 4 (4): 04013001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000142.
Hagos, M., D. Jung, and K. E. Lansey. 2016. “Optimal meter placement for pipe burst detection in water distribution systems.” J. Hydroinf. 18 (4): 741–756. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2016.170.
Horn, J. 2018. “City of San Diego could install 250,000 smart water meters.” Accessed July 25, 2022. https://www.10news.com/news/local-news/city-of-san-diego-could-install-250-000-smart-water-meters.
Hu, Z., B. Chen, W. Chen, D. Tan, and D. Shen. 2021. “Review of model-based and data-driven approaches for leak detection and location in water distribution systems.” Water Supply 21 (7): 3282–3306. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2021.101.
Huang, L., K. Du, M. Guan, W. Huang, Z. Song, and Q. Wang. 2022. “Combined usage of hydraulic model calibration residuals and improved vector angle method for burst detection and localization in water distribution systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 148 (7): 04022034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001575.
Hwang, H., K. Lansey, and D. Jung. 2018. “Accuracy of first-order second-moment approximation for uncertainty analysis of water distribution systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 144 (2): 04017087. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000864.
Jensen, T. N., and C. S. Kallesøe. 2016. “Application of a novel leakage detection framework for municipal water supply on AAU water supply lab.” In Proc., 3rd Conf. on Control and Fault-Tolerant Systems (SysTol), 428–433. New York: IEEE.
Jun, S., D. Jung, and K. E. Lansey. 2021. “Comparison of imputation methods for end-user demands in water distribution systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 147 (12): 04021080. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001477.
Jun, S., and K. E. Lansey. 2023a. “Convolutional neural network for burst detection in smart water distribution systems.” Water Resour. Manage. 37 (9): 3729–3743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03524-x.
Jun, S., and K. E. Lansey. 2023b. “Linear programming models for leak detection and localization in water distribution networks.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 149 (5): 04023017. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5720.
Jung, D., D. Kang, J. Liu, and K. Lansey. 2015. “Improving the rapidity of responses to pipe burst in water distribution systems: A comparison of statistical process control methods.” J. Hydroinf. 17 (2): 307–328. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2014.101.
Jung, D., and K. Lansey. 2015. “Water distribution system burst detection using a nonlinear Kalman filter.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 141 (5): 04014070. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000464.
Kang, D., and K. Lansey. 2012. “Revisiting optimal water-distribution system design: Issues and a heuristic hierarchical approach.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 138 (3): 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000165.
Li, Z., J. Wang, H. Yan, S. Li, T. Tao, and K. Xin. 2022. “Fast detection and localization of multiple leaks in water distribution network jointly driven by simulation and machine learning.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 148 (9): 05022005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001574.
Marzola, I., F. Mazzoni, S. Alvisi, and M. Franchini. 2022. “Leakage detection and localization in a water distribution network through comparison of observed and simulated pressure data.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 148 (1): 04021096. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001503.
Official City of Austin Open Data Portal. 2021. “Total water pumpage per capita per day.” Accessed July 25, 2022. https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/Total-Pumpage-Per-Capital-Per-Day/jn7a-ksta/.
Pointl, M., and D. Fuchs-Hanusch. 2021. “Assessing the potential of LPWAN communication technologies for near real-time leak detection in water distribution systems.” Sensors 21 (1): 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21010293.
Romano, M., Z. Kapelan, and D. A. Savic. 2014. “Automated detection of pipe bursts and other events in water distribution systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 140 (4): 457–467. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000339.
Romero-Ben, L., D. Alves, J. Blesa, G. Cembrano, V. Puig, and E. Duviella. 2022. “Leak localization in water distribution networks using data-driven and model-based approaches.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 148 (5): 04022016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001542.
Rossman, L. A., H. Woo, M. Tryby, F. Shang, R. Janke, and T. Haxton. 2020. EPANET 2.2 user’s manual, water infrastructure division. Cincinnati: Center for Environmental Solutions and Emergency Response.
Smart Water Magazine. 2022. “GoAigua’s technology makes Gandía a European smart water city.” Accessed August 8, 2022. https://smartwatermagazine.com/news/goaigua/goaiguas-technology-makes-gandia-a-european-smart-water-city.
Steffelbauer, D. B., E. J. M. Blokker, S. G. Buchberger, A. Knobbe, and E. Abraham. 2021. “Dynamic time warping clustering to discover socioeconomic characteristics in smart water meter data.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 147 (6): 04021026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001360.
Steffelbauer, D. B., J. Deuerlein, D. Gilbert, E. Abraham, and O. Piller. 2022. “Pressure-leak duality for leak detection and localization in water distribution systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 148 (3): 04021106. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001515.
Thames Water. 2021. “Thames water hits half a million smart meter milestone.” Accessed July 25, 2022. https://www.thameswater.co.uk/about-us/newsroom/latest-news/2021/apr/smart-water-meter-milestone.
United States Census Bureau. 2021. “Population and housing unit estimates.” Accessed July 25, 2022. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/austincitytexas/LND110210.
Vrachimis, S. G., D. G. Eliades, R. Taormina, A. Ostfeld, Z. Kapelan, S. Liu, M. S. Kyriakou, P. Pavlou, M. Qiu, and M. Polycarpou. 2020. “Dataset of BattLeDIM: Battle of the leakage detection and isolation methods.” In Proc., 2nd Int. CCWI/WDSA Joint Conf. Kingston, ON, Canada: Queen’s Univ.
Wan, X., P. K. Kuhanestani, R. Farmani, and E. Keedwell. 2022. “Literature review of data analytics for leak detection in water distribution networks: A focus on pressure and flow smart sensors.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 148 (10): 03122002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001597.
Wang, X., J. Li, S. Liu, X. Yu, and Z. Ma. 2022. “Multiple leakage detection and isolation in district metering areas using a multistage approach.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 148 (6): 04022021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.000155.
WEC (Western Electric Company). 1956. Statistical quality control handbook. 2nd ed. Indianapolis: AT&T Technologies.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 12, 2022
Accepted: Jun 29, 2023
Published online: Aug 30, 2023
Published in print: Nov 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jan 30, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Comparative studies
- Data collection
- Detection methods
- Engineering fundamentals
- Flow measurement
- Infrastructure
- Measurement (by type)
- Methodology (by type)
- Pipe leakage
- Pipeline management
- Pipeline systems
- Research methods (by type)
- Water and water resources
- Water leakage and water loss
- Water management
- Water supply
- Water supply systems
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.